Примеры использования It was agreed that paragraph на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It was agreed that paragraph 73 required further clarification.
While recognizing the business practice of issuing multiple originals, it was agreed that paragraph 7 in its current form should be deleted.
It was agreed that paragraph(a) could result in that inclusion and should be permitted.
After discussion, it was agreed that paragraph(4) would remain as drafted.
It was agreed that paragraph(1) of draft article 39 should be deleted and its substance should be reflected in the Guide.
In response to these concerns, it was agreed that paragraph(2) should not describe complex pre-selection procedures.
It was agreed that paragraph 70 should be cross-referenced to other sections of the Guide addressing unauthorized transactions.
After discussion, it was agreed that paragraph(3) should also refer to the court's power to modify or terminate relief granted under articles 15 and 17 on its own motion.
It was agreed that paragraph(a) of recommendation 142, which was common to both alternative A and alternative B, should be retained.
With respect to the preface and the introduction, it was agreed that paragraph 29 should clarify that, upon default, the secured creditor had a right to dispose of the encumbered asset and the transferee acquired the rights of the grantor free of security rights with a lower priority ranking than that of the security right of the enforcing secured creditor.
It was agreed that paragraph 9 should be aligned with recommendation 78, which referred to security rights that were registered in a specialized registry.
It was agreed that paragraph(4) was only intended to apply in circumstances where a party had voluntarily submitted a document.
It was agreed that paragraph(c) of the purpose section should be aligned with paragraph(c) of the purpose section under the unitary approach.
It was agreed that paragraph 4(e) should be deleted, in conformity with the Working Group's decisions to delete references to electronic procurement in articles 22 ter and 51 bis onwards.
It was agreed that paragraph(2) was the appropriate place in which to express the requirement for the latter, but not the former, which should be addressed elsewhere in the Rules.
Thus it was agreed that paragraph(2) should be retained, but subject to the question of whether the selection of the type of framework agreement would be subject to review in due course.
It was agreed that paragraph(6) should be deleted, as the procuring entity would in any event be able to present the original complaint to an administrative or judicial body.
It was agreed that paragraph(1) should be replaced with the following text:"Any procurement contract issued shall be in accordance with the terms and conditions of the framework agreement and the provisions of this article.
Moreover, it was agreed that paragraph 51 should include an example of consumer confusion with respect to trademarks replacing the current example, which referred to plain infringement.
After discussion, it was agreed that paragraph 5 in its current form should be deleted, yet with the possibility of introducing a similar paragraph which would not touch upon substantive law.
Moreover, it was agreed that paragraph 22 should clarify that the notion of"possession" could not apply to intangible assets, because it was defined in the Guide to mean"actual possession.
After discussion, it was agreed that paragraph 5 should be redrafted to align it with the wording of article 29(5)(e), which did not itself refer to cases of serious economic emergency.
Accordingly, it was agreed that paragraph(1) be replaced with the following:"All communications in the course of ODR proceedings shall be submitted by electronic means via the ODR platform designated by the ODR provider.
It was agreed that paragraph(5) should be accompanied with the provisions in the Guide highlighting the danger of closed framework agreements of long duration, in the light of their potentially anticompetitive nature.
It was agreed that paragraph(e) should be expanded to incorporate the aim of requiring the selection criteria to be disclosed in advance, with appropriate discussion in the Guide to Enactment.
It was agreed that paragraph 1 of the Working Group's text, which addressed privacy matters, would remain in draft article 14, and that paragraph 2, which addressed matters related to home and the family, would become a new article 14 bis.
After discussion, it was agreed that paragraph 3 should be retained in square brackets for the Working Group to revisit it once it had completed its consideration of all the articles that dealt with the duties of the registrar.
In addition, it was agreed that paragraph 19 should avoid referring to voluntary registration of a security right in a copyright, which as a matter of law relating to copyright was dealt with differently from State to State.
It was agreed that paragraph 4 should be revised to clarify that the paragraph intended to enable the issuance of an electronic transferable record to bearer in circumstances where the same would be allowed for a paper-based transferable document or instrument.
It was agreed that paragraph 43 and examples 5 and 6 could be retained for educational reasons, but placed at the end of the examples with additional wording explaining that they did not involve transactions in which a security right was created in intellectual property.