Примеры использования Its extension request на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Ecuador indicated that it hoped in the course of 2007 to formalize its extension request.
In its extension request submitted in 2008, Mozambique indicated that it would complete implementation by 1 March 2014.
The time-scale for completing this clearance cannot be determined with any degree of certainty andhence the UK will not be revising its extension request.
Venezuela committed in its extension request to address in 2012 a total of one mined area measuring 20,000 square metres.
Detail and clarity is also important because it can assist the requesting State Party in using its extension request as a means to mobilise resources.
In its extension request submitted in 2009, Uganda indicated that it would complete implementation of Article 5 by 1 August 2012.
In addition, the analysing group noted that it would be beneficial if Colombia provided ongoing detailed updates relative to commitments made in its extension request at meetings of the Standing Committees, at Meetings of the States Parties and at Review Conferences.
In its extension request submitted in 2008, Thailand indicated that it would complete implementation of Article 5 by 1 November 2018.
The analysing group further noted that both the Democratic Republic of the Congo andall States Parties could benefit if the Democratic Republic of the Congo provided updates on all commitments made in its extension request at meetings of the Standing Committees and at Meetings of the States Parties.
In its extension request submitted in 2009, Tajikistan indicated that it would complete implementation of Article 5 by 1 April 2020.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting requested that Afghanistan provide updates at meetings of the Standing Committees, Meetings of the States Parties, and Review Conferences with respect to a variety of commitments made andmilestones contained in its extension request, including with respect to the following.
In its extension request submitted in 2008, Yemen indicated that it would complete implementation of Article 5 by 1 March 2015.
In particular, the analysing group noted that both Senegal and all States Parties could benefit if Senegal provided updates on such matters at meetings of the Standing Committees, at the Second Review Conference and at Meetings of the States Parties,including by reporting on progress relative to the detailed listing areas annexed to its extension request.
In its extension request submitted in 2011, Algeria has indicated that completion of Article 5 implementation is expected by 1 April 2017.
Also in granting the request, the Meeting requested that Zimbabwe provide updates at the meetings of the Standing Committees in 2013 and at the Thirteenth Meeting of the States Parties with respect to a variety of commitments made andmilestones contained in its extension request, and observations contained in the analysis on the request, including with respect to the following.
In its extension request submitted in 2009, Uganda indicated that its original challenge amounted to 427 suspected hazardous areas.
Mozambique reported that, in accordance with its extension request, it developed a national mine action plan(2008-2014), which includes an annual action plan per province and district, including financial implications for both operations and coordination.
In its extension request submitted in 2011, Eritrea has indicated that this resurvey will take place during the 3 year extension period.
In its extension request submitted in 2009, Tajikistan indicated that its original implementation challenge amounted to 50,668,272 square metres.
In its extension request submitted in 2009, Tajikistan indicated as of December 2008, a total of 14,849,631 square metres remained to be addressed.
In its extension request submitted in 2011, Congo has indicated that it still needs to obtain the information necessary to confirm or refute this suspicion.
In its extension request submitted in 2008, Thailand indicated that its original implementation challenge amounted to 934 suspected areas totalling 2,556.7 square kilometres.
In its extension request submitted in 2008, Senegal indicated that its original implementation challenge amounted to 149 areas suspected to contain anti-personnel mines.
In its extension request submitted in 2009, Uganda indicated that one of the 427 originally identified areas remained as did one additional area for a total of 270,000 square metres.
In its extension request submitted on 31 March 2008 and granted on 28 November 2008, Ecuador reported 75 areas in which anti-personnel mines are known to be emplaced.
In its extension request submitted in 2012, Cyprus has indicated that implementation would be complete with respect to all mined areas under the effective control of Cyprus by Cyprus' 1 July 2013 deadline.
In its extension request considered in 2008, Yemen indicated that of 1,088 areas totalling 923,332,281 square metres that were of concern to Yemen, 631 areas totalling 710,103,911 square metres have been released.
In its extension request submitted in 2008, Mozambique indicated that at Landmine Impact Survey concluded in 2001 recorded 1,374 areas suspected to contain anti-personnel mines totalling 561.69 square kilometres.
In its extension request considered in 2008, Jordan indicated that the benefits of mine action in the country are almost immediate due to a combination of scarcity of natural resources, high population growth rates and robust foreign private sector.
Since its extension request was granted in 2008, Jordan reported that in 2009 manual clearance was implemented on over 250,000 square metres of land, while almost 2 million square metres of land was verified by utilizing manual, mechanical and mine detection dog methods.