Примеры использования Mavlonov на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Communication No. 1334/2004, Mavlonov and Sa'di v. Uzbekistan.
Mr. Mavlonov reviewed all publications prior to their release for compliance with the law.
It has become a good tradition," said Javokhir Mavlonov, a spokesman for the Senate.
According to Mr. Mavlonov, this application was in conformity with Uzbek law.
Such restrictions made membership in the free-trade-minded WTO a pipe dream,said Mavlonov.
On 29 March 2001, Mr. Mavlonov and the private firm"Simo" submitted a re-registration application.
Its founders were the private firm"Kamol",the Samarkand City Bogishamal District Administration and Mr. Mavlonov, as an editor.
Communication No. 1334/2004, Mavlonov and Sa'di v. Uzbekistan Views adopted on 19 March 2009, Ninety-fifth session.
An entire section of the State Programme is devoted to prioritising security, inter-ethnic accord andreligious tolerance in 2018," Senate spokesman Javokhir Mavlonov told Caravanserai.
Mr. Mavlonov returned to the Temiryul Inter-district Civil Court where he had begun, but this time as plaintiff himself.
The 549 suspected extremists detained in the first half of 2016 included"members of ISIL[the'Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant'] and the Turkistan Islamic Movement",senate spokesman Javokhir Mavlonov told Caravanserai.
They state that one of the authors,Mr. Mavlonov, has had to flee Uzbekistan since the communication was submitted to the Committee.
The inter-district court noted a new allegation by the Press Department that"Simo"'s financial situation was insecure;it also prominently noted remarks by the Press Department that Mr. Mavlonov was"not a qualified journalist by education.
Mr. Mavlonov proceeded to the Samarkand Regional Economic Court on behalf of Oina, which was replaced by"Simo" during the hearing.
Uzbekistan is situated in the centre of the region and all strategic economic routes go through it, Mavlonov said, adding that investments made by major international companies in Uzbekistan will have a positive impact on neighbouring countries' economies.
Mr. Mavlonov concluded that further requests to the Supreme Court would be futile, and that, therefore, all domestic remedies had been exhausted.
Under article 2, paragraph 3(a), of the Covenant,the State party is under obligation to provide Mr. Mavlonov and Mr. Sa'di with an effective remedy, including the reconsideration of"Oina's" application for re-registration, and compensation for Mr. Mavlonov.
Mr. Mavlonov appealed to the Samarkand Regional Civil Court, which delivered its judgment on 28 June 2002, affirming the decision of the inter-district court.
In the present case, the Committee is of the opinion that the application of the procedure of registration andre-registration of Oina did not allow Mr. Mavlonov, as the editor, and Mr. Sa'di, as a reader, to practice their freedom of expression, as defined in article 19, paragraph 2.
Mavlonov, CEO of the airline, said at a press conference on July 20 th the issue of launching this flight was discussed twice during the Tajik-Uzbek intergovernmental commission's meeting in Tashkent.
Mr. Neuman cited an example of a case involving the receipt of communications: in Mavlonov et al. v. Uzbekistan, the banning of a Tajik-language newspaper had been found to be a violation of the rights of both the producers and the readers of the newspaper.
Mr. Mavlonov is the editor of the newspaper Oina and Mr. Sa'di is a regular reader of the same newspaper. Oina was published almost exclusively in the Tajik language, principally for a Tajik audience.
Sir Nigel Rodley said that, while he did consent to the proposed amendment,he wished to note that in the Mavlonov case, some members of the Committee had considered that suppressing a newspaper did not automatically violate the rights of all its potential readers under article 19.
Mr. Mavlonov filed suit on behalf of Oina to challenge the Press Department decision in the Temiryul Inter-district Civil Court. On 17 September 2001, the court dismissed the case due to lack of jurisdiction andinstructed Mr. Mavlonov to bring his suit to the economic court.
Ms. Chanet, noting the seemingly odd juxtaposition between the first and second parts of the first sentence of the paragraph, asked the rapporteur to confirm whether the first sentence had been quoted from the Gauthier v. Canada case andthe second part of the sentence had been quoted from the Mavlonov et al. v. Uzbekistan case.
As a result of the two stages of the competition won Anvar Mavlonov, the chief of MTA, on the second place is Utkir Mamatov, the mining operations engineer of WGHL, on the third place is Nodirbek Tadzhidinov, the mechanic of WGHL.
Mr. Mavlonov claims that the refusal of the Press Department of the Samarkand region to re-register the Oina newspaper(of which he was the editor) amounts to a violation by the State party of his right to freedom of expression(in particular his right to impart information in print), as protected by article 19 of the Covenant.
Article 19, paragraph 2, of the ICCPR specifically protects the work of journalists(see Human Rights Committee,communication No. 1334/2004, Mavlonov and Sa'di v. Uzbekistan(CCPR/C/95/D/1334/2004)) and"includes the right of individuals to criticize or openly and publicly evaluate their Governments without fear of interference or punishment.
In case No. 1334/2004(Mavlonov and Sa'di v. Uzbekistan), the authors claimed that the refusal by the authorities to re-register"Oina", a newspaper published in the Tajik language, was in violation of article 19 of the Covenant in its failure to be"provided by law" and to pursue any legitimate aim, as understood under article 19, paragraph 3.
He complained, inter alia, about the arbitrary decisions taken by the Head of the Press Department,who required Mr. Mavlonov to find an additional founder for Oina after the first opt-out, despite the fact that under paragraph 4 of the annex to Resolution No. 160, a mass media entity could be registered even with just one founder.