Примеры использования May exercise diplomatic на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Which State may exercise diplomatic protection?
If one takes the position that the State of nationality of such a corporation may not bring a claim as the corporation no longer exists at the time of presentation of the claim,then no State may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of an injury to the corporation.
Any State of which a dual or multiple national is a national may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of that national against a State of which that person is not a national.
A State may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a stateless person who, at the time of the injury and at the date of the official presentation of the claim, is lawfully and habitually resident in that State.
The State of nationality of an alien subject to expulsion may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of the alien in question.
A State may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a person who is recognized as a refugee by that State when that person, at the time of the injury and at the date of the official presentation of the claim, is lawfully and habitually resident in that State.
As regards unconsummated international treaties, commitments or acts,the Legislature may exercise diplomatic influence over the Executive(subpara. 13) by making specific proposals and suggestions;
A State may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of such a person, regardless of how he or she became stateless, provided that he or she was lawfully and habitually resident in that State both at the time of injury and at the date of the official presentation of the claim.
Draft article 11 creates two exceptions to the general rule that only the State of incorporation may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of claims of that corporation, one of which is for an injury to an extinct corporation.
A State of nationality may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a person against a State of which that person is also a national if there is a genuine link between that person and the former State, both at the time of the injury and at the date of the official presentation of the claim.
Any State of which a dual or multiple national is a national,in accordance with the criteria listed in article 5, may exercise diplomatic protection on behalf of that national against a State of which he or she is not also a national.
This is a fair question, as the present language of article 9 suggests that only the State in which thecorporation is formed and in whose territory it has"its registered office or the seat of its management or some similar connection" may exercise diplomatic protection.
Within the limits prescribed by international law,a State may exercise diplomatic protection by whatever means and to whatever extent it thinks fit, for it is its own right that the State is asserting.
The State in which the company is incorporated alone has the right to exercise diplomatic protection in respect of an injury to the company,subject to the exceptions expounded in Barcelona Traction in which the State of nationality of the shareholders of the company may exercise diplomatic protection on their behalf.
Subject to article 9, paragraph 4, the State of nationality may exercise diplomatic protection on behalf of an injured national against a State of which the injured person is also a national where the individual's[dominant][effective] nationality is that of the former State.
Although international law has no rules of its own for the creation, management and dissolution of a corporation or for the rights of shareholders and their relationship with the corporation, and must consequently turn to municipal law for guidance on this subject,it is for international law to determine the circumstances in which a State may exercise diplomatic protection on behalf of a corporation or its shareholders.
The State in which the company is incorporated andwith which it enjoys a"genuine link" of the kind described in Nottebohm may exercise diplomatic protection on behalf of the company, subject to the exceptions in favour of shareholders' claims recognized in Barcelona Traction.
A State may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a person who is recognized as a refugee by that State, in accordance with internationally accepted standards, when that person, at the date of injury and at the date of the official presentation of the claim, is lawfully and habitually resident in that State.
This would require recognition of the possibility of dual nationality of corporations and adoption of the test of"closest connection","effective nationality" or"predominant nationality"(toaccord with article 7) as an indication of which State may exercise diplomatic protection. Guatemala's suggestion that it should be made clear that the term"corporation" means"limited liability company" is already taken care of in paragraph(2) of the commentary.
Notwithstanding paragraph 1, a State may exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a person who is its national at the date of the official presentation of the claim but was not a national at the time of the injury, provided that the person has lost his or her former nationality and has acquired, for a reason unrelated to the bringing of the claim, the nationality of that State in a manner not inconsistent with international law.
Where an injured person has undergone a bona fide change of nationality following an injury, the new State of nationality may exercise diplomatic protection on behalf of that person in respect of the injury, provided that the State of original nationality has not exercised or is not exercising diplomatic protection in respect of the injured person at the date on which the change of nationality occurs.
The text even implied that a State might exercise diplomatic protection even when an individual had already instituted proceedings before a human rights court.
The text also implied to some that a State might exercise diplomatic protection even when an individual had already instituted proceedings before a human rights court.
The general rule was that a State might exercise diplomatic protection on behalf of its nationals only.
The text should specify the conditions under which the State might exercise diplomatic protection in such cases.
The Nordic countries therefore supported the Commission's approach,whereby a State might exercise diplomatic protection in respect of a person who was its national both at the time of the injury and at the date of the official presentation of the claim.
Draft article 8 on the exercise of diplomatic protection in respect of stateless persons and refugees represented progressive development of law,since it departed from the traditional concept that a State might exercise diplomatic protection only with respect to one of its nationals.
Her delegation was inclined to accept the Commission's view that one State of nationality might exercise diplomatic protection against another State of which the person was a national, provided that the nationality of the first State was predominant at the time of the occurrence of the injury and at the time of the presentation of the claim.
Others were of the view that the principle that a State might exercise diplomatic protection in respect of stateless persons or refugees was not based on practice, was contrary to the 1967 Protocol to the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951 and had no basis in the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness of 1961.
The principle that a State might exercise diplomatic protection in respect of stateless persons or refugees was not based on practice, was contrary to the Protocol to the Convention relating to the Status of Refugees of 1951 and had no basis in the Convention on the Reduction of Statelessness of 1961.