Примеры использования Menéndez asked на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Mr. MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ asked whether the Taser gun was used against minors.
Mr. MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ asked if discrimination was considered an aggravating circumstance when a person had been tortured by a State agent because of the colour of his skin or his national or ethnic origin?
Stressing that discrimination and violence against women must be dealt with by targeted action,Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether the Government intended to amend the legislation so as to eliminate the principal forms of discrimination, some of which(such as the criminalization of adultery if committed by a woman) even manifested themselves as inhuman treatment.
Mr. MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ asked whether there were military courts in Latvia and, if so, whether they were competent to try civilians.
With regard to article 16, Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked why the state party was implementing a program of sterilization that was solely aimed at indigenous communities.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether the State party had maintained the geographical limitations established in its reservations to the 1951 Geneva Convention relating to the Status of Refugees in its new asylum legislation, whether the new legislation recognized the principle of subsidiary protection and whether asylum-seekers whose applications were initially rejected were immediately expelled or had the right to appeal against the decision.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether other committees had carried out the same analysis and, if so, with what results.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether there was an investigation and documentation protocol in place for the crime of femicide.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether a section on the follow-up to individual complaints would be included in chapter VI.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether applications for asylum submitted to French embassies or consulates abroad were admissible.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked how many judges had been elected under the system of electing judges from the National Assembly or Senate.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked under what conditions Bulgaria resorted to incommunicado detention and how long that detention could last.
Mr. MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ asked whether the Rapporteur on New Complaints, acting alone, should be empowered to withdraw interim measures of protection.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked why the Government did not invoke article 21 of the Convention to obtain the release of its citizen detained in Guantanamo.
Mr. MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ asked the delegation to state whether persons who had been arrested or sentenced could be placed in solitary confinement.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether diplomatic assurances had been sought only for the purposes of extradition procedures or in other cases as well.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked about the current status of the pending legislation concerning citizenship, specifically as it pertained to the acquisition or loss of Czech nationality.
Mr. MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ asked whether the SPT had already set up a system for the follow-up of recommendations addressed to States parties after its visits.
Mr. MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ asked whether the Schengen Agreement was fully implemented by Hungary and whether provisions had been adopted to incorporate it into domestic law.
In addition, Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked the delegation to specify whether police prosecutors actually existed in the State Party, and to describe in detail how the prosecution was structured.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether judges or any other body of the public administration in the State party could order detainees to be placed in incommunicado detention.
Mr. MARIÑO MENÉNDEZ asked whether, in ratifying the Optional Protocol to the Convention, Estonia was establishing any new mechanism to provide for visits to people in places of detention.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether the commutation of prison terms of up to 5 years to fines, aimed at reducing prison overcrowding, would also be applied to persons convicted of acts of torture.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked when the Committee might expect to be informed whether it would be allocated the additional financial resources needed to extend its May 2010 session by one week.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether solitary confinement could be imposed on persons who were remanded in custody or was restricted to persons confined in prisons or other detention centres.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked if IRCT considered that the Istanbul Protocol could be applied in cases of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment that did not qualify as torture.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether international observers would be present at the trial of the 140 persons arrested during the dismantling of the Gadim Izik camp, who had been released on bail in April 2011 after 6 months in detention.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether, for certain types of offences such as terrorism or drug trafficking, the State party's legislation provided for the possibility of placing suspects in incommunicado detention.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether the document entitled"Secretariat's comments on the evaluation of facts and evidence by the Committee against Torture"(CAT/C/43/R.3), which was dated 19 October 2009, had been prepared at the Chairperson's request.
Mr. Mariño Menéndez asked whether the Convention was considered to be an international agreement to which Mongolia was a party for the purposes of ensuring the international jurisdiction of the Criminal Code, as indicated in paragraph 68(c) of the initial report.