Примеры использования Minimum benefit на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Since 1 January 1994 the minimum benefits have been increased.
Minimum benefit after 9 years of service is $85,040.
Those who work are also entitled to the following minimum benefits.
In 1998, the minimum benefit was Fmk 60 and it is paid for six days per week.
The Disablement Assistance(Young Disabled Persons) Act provides for a minimum benefit for young disabled persons.
Minimum benefits in respect of temporary incapacity are fixed at 90 per cent of the minimum wage art. 239, para. 3 of the Labour Code.
The shared-housing reductions have already been abolished, and the minimum benefit has been in effect since October 1, 2005.
However, a sample alternative was presented to the Board at that time to elicit comments andguidance on redesigning the minimum benefit.
In the event of disability, the pension company pays an annual minimum benefit of 30 per cent of the applicable salary in addition to child pensions.
In no case may unemployment benefit exceed the national average monthly wage orbe less than the established minimum benefit.
The Secretary/CEO noted that the overlapping of the provisions occurred over time, as the minimum benefit increased with periodic cost-of-living adjustments.
There is also a provision on minimum benefits for single parents: if the double-amount provision results in lowerbenefits than this minimum, then minimum benefits shall be paid.
More male unemployed(5557 per cent) receive maximum benefit, whereas more female unemployed receive minimum benefit 56-61 per cent.
The total replacement ratio for those receiving the minimum benefit adjustment ranges from just above 20 per cent to above 40 per cent of final pensionable remuneration.
In a separate sessional note to the Board on Small Pensions, FAFICS supported the approach of the secretariat in the development of the minimum benefit alternative.
Streamline the entire minimum benefit/small pension provisions in order to coordinate benefit amounts, eliminate the overlap of provisions and simplify communication and administration(transparency);
The development of services to provide comprehensive support to families living in poverty, including, where possible,guaranteed minimum benefits for the poorest families.
In further developing the Austrian social assistance scheme, the needs-based minimum benefit system(Bedarfsorientierte Mindestsicherung, BMS) was introduced throughout Austria in 2010 in order to assist individuals in financial distress.
When analysed in terms of income replacement ratios in local currency, the benefits provided by the Fund,taking into account both the small pension and the minimum benefit provisions, appeared to be generally reasonable.
The system of sickness benefit was changed in 2002 so thatthe earlier minimum benefit based on the assessment of need was replaced by a minimum benefit that is always paid, provided that the sickness has lasted at least 55 days without interruptions.
The Secretary/CEO also noted that the Board might wish to request that a further study be completed on the issue of the overlap in benefit amounts between the small pension and minimum benefit provisions.
It was further noted that that overlap in the benefit provisions had not been anticipated by the Board, since the minimum benefit and small pension provisions had been designed and implemented independently of each other.
The Board was informed that approximately 1 to 3 per cent of current retirees were receiving a benefit increased by the small pension provisions,while about 7 to 9 per cent were receiving a benefit increased by the minimum benefit provisions.
After 15 years of contributory service,the regular benefit formula provides a more substantial portion of the benefit paid, with the minimum benefit provisions contained in article 28 adding about 6 per cent of final pensionable remuneration for two thirds of the countries.
In considering alternative designs for the minimum benefit and small pension provisions, the secretary/CEO noted in 2013 to the Board that, owing to the uniqueness of the current design, it was not possible to develop an exact replication of the current benefit levels when considering the goal of simplification.
In 2012 and 2013,the Fund secretariat presented to the Board the results of studies it had completed regarding the level of benefits provided through both the small pension and minimum benefit provisions, as well as consideration of possible alternatives for simplification.
It was also noted that that the alternatives for the redesign of the small pension and minimum benefit provisions are anticipated to be presented to the Board at its session in 2015 for suggested implementation after 2016, as the General Assembly would only be considering the budget items during its session in 2015.
From the point of view of sickness and accident insurance law it must be added that in accordance with the system laid down in Austrian social insurance law a mandatory insurance under the statutory health and accidence insurance system is generally linked to an Austrian income from gainful employment and/ or some related payment and/ or benefit( such as unemployment benefit orpension payment); individuals who receive payments under the needs-based minimum benefit system are also covered by the statutory health insurance system.
It was further noted that, in terms of replacement ratios,after 10 years of contributory service the minimum benefit provisions contained in article 28 almost double the regular benefit payable from the Fund for all of the locations considered in the study, except Chile, France, Switzerland and the United States.
The Secretary/CEO noted that neither the small pension adjustment nor the minimum benefit provisions provided a benefit for staff with longer service and, furthermore, the small pension adjustment was not taken into account when determining the local currency track benefit under the two-track provisions of the pension adjustment system.