Примеры использования New gtld registry на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
All new gTLD registry operators are.
April 2011- discussion draft new gtld registry agreement.
Draft new gtld registry agreement.
Maynovember 2010- proposed final new gtld registry agreement.
New gTLD Registry Operators must provide Trademark Claims services during an initial launch period for marks in the Trademark Clearinghouse.
November 2010april 2011- proposed finaldiscussion draft new gtld registry agreement.
The clearinghouse would also support any new gTLD registry during its initial launch phases by facilitating services such as.
Adoption of a proposed URS implementation procedure is recommended as a best practice for new gTLD registry operators.
Regions disagrees with allowing a new gTLD registry to provide a Sunrise Registration Process in lieu of the Pre-Launch IP Claims Service.
In the implementation shown below, adoption of the URS is recommended as a best practice for new gTLD registry operators.
New gTLD Registry Operators must provide Trademark Claims services during an initial launch period for marks in the Trademark Clearinghouse.
Adoption of a proposed URS implementation procedure as a best practice for new gTLD registry operators, is published along with this document and will be considered by the GNSO.
Currently, such communications are proposed with respect to trademark claims watch and/or sunrise periods,depending on which RPM each new gTLD registry operator adopts.
If achieved, this status would allow the new gTLD registry operator to display a seal indicating that it is verified as a high-security zone, to enhance consumer awareness and trust.
These parties described several potential malicious conduct issues andencouraged ICANN to consider ways these might be addressed or mitigated in new gTLD registry agreements.
New gTLD registry operators have the option of implementing either:(a) a Trademark Watch service, or(b) a Sunrise Period to address rights protection in the initial launch phases of the TLD.
These parties described several potentialmalicious conduct issues and encouraged ICANN to consider ways these might be addressed or mitigated within the new gTLD registry agreements, or as a component of the application process.
Under the additional draft provision, a new gTLD registry operator would be required to enforce the reservation of certain country and territory names as identified in specific sources listed in the text.
As described in the accompanying Explanatory Memorandum,“Thick vs. Thin Whois for New gTLDs,” ICANN has drafted the specification to reflect a requirement for a thick Whois service to be provided by all new gTLD registry operators.
All new gTLD registry operators are required to provide certain minimum protections for country and territory names, including an initial reservation requirement and any applicable rules and procedures for release of these names.
For example, global community concerns must be considered, protection of rights holders must be held, and the likelihood that a new gTLD registry operator has the financial wherewithal and technical resources to stably andappropriately operate a new gTLD registry must be considered.
In the event that any new gTLD registry application completes the evaluation and the TLD is delegated, the registry operator may choose at that point to apply for verification and would then complete the above tests in a single phase.
The clarification of requirements necessary to obtain 2 points on questions 28 and 29 is useful, but ICANN missed a tremendous opportunity to make an important contribution to the security andstability of the Internet by failing to require that all new gTLD registry operators implement a rapid takedown or suspension system.
Pre-Launch Trademark Claims Services The IRT has recommended that each new gTLD registry operator provide either a sunrise registration process or a pre-launch trademark claims service that will utilize the services of the Clearinghouse.
Microsoft supports theadditions to section 4.3(f) that allow ICANN to terminate the new gTLD Registry Agreement if the registry operator does not terminate employees or board members convicted of certain crimes, found by a court to have engaged in fraud or violated fiduciary duty, and substantive equivalents thereto.
Sunrise Registration Process In lieu of a pre-launch trademark claims service, the IRT proposes that each new gTLD registry operator be required to provide a sunrise registration process that applies sunrise eligibility requirements(SERs) as a floor, verified by Clearinghouse data, and incorporates a Sunrise Dispute Resolution Policy SDRP.
Additional resources are planned andwill be secured to effectively serve the new gTLD registries.
The majority of the current 21 New gTLD Registries are located in USA or Europe.
The Group believes that the Model should apply to all new gTLD registries.
PROTECTION FOR MARKS IN CLEARINGHOUSE 7.1 New gTLD registries must provide Sunrise or Trademark Claims services for marks in the Trademark Clearinghouse.