Примеры использования No-action motion на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
For these reasons, we will abstain on the no-action motion.
A no-action motion on this draft resolution had already been presented in Third Committee and had failed.
The representatives of Cuba andChina made statements against the no-action motion.
We would urge Member States to reject the no-action motion and to proceed to a vote on the amendment.
The representatives of Israel andBulgaria spoke against the no-action motion.
Her delegation therefore supported the no-action motion and urged all delegations to vote in favour of it.
The representatives of Bulgaria andthe United States of America spoke against the no-action motion.
Pakistan fully supports the no-action motion on draft resolution III and will vote in favour.
The draft resolution under consideration was adopted by the Third Committee after a no-action motion had been presented and had failed.
The no-action motion misused the rules of procedure and would undermine the credibility of the Committee and the General Assembly.
The New Zealand delegation would vote against the no-action motion and hoped that all other delegations would support its position.
A no-action motion negated the jurisdiction and responsibility of the General Assembly, undermined its credibility and seriously weakened its relevance.
Mr. Akram(Pakistan): My delegation has voted against the no-action motion proposed by the Netherlands and supported by some others.
At the same meeting, the representatives of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland andGermany made statements against the no-action motion.
Also at the 5th meeting,the Council proceeded to a roll-call vote on the no-action motion which was defeated by a vote of 27 to 22, with 5 abstentions.
A no-action motion would jeopardize the viability of the Declaration and send a signal to the international community that the Committee was unable to act in such an important area.
In line with our firm andprincipled position, Pakistan supports the no-action motion on draft resolution III, and will vote in favour of it.
Statements in connection with the no-action motion were made by the representatives of Canada, Cuba, Guatemala, India, Ireland(on behalf of the European Union) and the Syrian Arab Republic.
Mr. Normandin(Canada): We wish to express our deep disappointment that a no-action motion has been presented in the plenary of the General Assembly.
The no-action motion would contribute to the objective and equitable review by the Committee of all human rights issues, and China asked other delegations to support it.
Nevertheless, if we had the right of vote,we would vote against the no-action motion because it is not the most democratic way to deal with the proposals of Member States.
In the informal consultations which have been held over the last few days,our colleagues from the countries addressed by the Russian draft have indicated that they would use the procedural gambit of a no-action motion to block it.
To that end, they had resorted to a no-action motion, despite their own opposition to such motions in the case of country-specific resolutions.
Mr. Escalona Ojeda(Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela)said that the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela supported the no-action motion because the draft resolution was politicized and selective and reflected double standards.
We consider that in voting on the no-action motion, we also voted on the draft resolution and that no delegation was prevented from expressing its opinion on the content thereof.
For all those reasons, the European Union strongly urges delegations to vote against this no-action motion, regardless of their voting intentions on draft resolution III contained in document A/59/503/Add.3.
Mr. McNee(Canada), speaking against the no-action motion, said that the draft resolution had been sponsored by 44 Member States, which believed that the Committee had the right and duty to consider it.
His delegation regarded any vote in favour of the amendments to the draft resolution as a vote for a no-action motion; accordingly, he would vote against the amendments to the draft resolution and appealed to all delegations to do the same.
For both of those reasons, we will vote against this no-action motion and urge all States to vote no, regardless of their voting intentions on the draft resolution itself.
He urged members to consider the consequences of a no-action motion: it would give perpetrators of human rights violations a sense of comfort and immunity, while intensifying the loneliness and helplessness of the victims.