Примеры использования Non-unitary approach на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Non-unitary approach.
If a State were to adopt a non-unitary approach, it would face a similar choice.
Non-unitary approach to acquisition financing devices.
Recommendation 189 offered similar alternatives with respect to the non-unitary approach.
Purpose non-unitary approach.
However, it would first be necessary to decide whether it was wise to use the concept of priority in the non-unitary approach.
Ii Non-unitary approach continued.
To provide that States could adopt either a unitary or a non-unitary approach to acquisition financing;
Non-unitary approach to acquisition financing devices.
The Chairperson urged the Committee to refrain from revisiting decisions that had already been taken by the Working Group with regard to the non-unitary approach.
Option B: Non-unitary approach to acquisition financing Conflict of laws.
In such a case, suppliers would be treated in the same way as secured creditors and a non-unitary approach might not be necessary.
Non-unitary approach to acquisition financing rights Private international law.
After discussion, the Commission approved the substance of the unitary approach and referred the non-unitary approach to Working Group VI for further discussion.
Ii Section B. Non-unitary approach to acquisition financing rights.
The Working Group reiterated its approval of the functional approach andthe distinction between unitary and non-unitary approach to acquisition financing devices.
Non-unitary approach to acquisition financing rights recommendations 184 to 201.
The commentary will also explain that an acquisition security right is to be treated as a security right in the context of both the unitary and the non-unitary approach.
The non-unitary approach was presented in the draft Guide as an alternative to the unitary approach. .
The only reason to extend the retention-of-title right to proceeds in the non-unitary approach recommendations would be to maintain the principle of functional equivalence.
Section B. Non-unitary approach to acquisition financing rights(recommendations 184 to 201) continued.
Furthermore, the Committee had decided that the second paragraph of the note to the Commission following recommendation 191 in the non-unitary approach section should be reflected in the final version of the text.
Should a State adopt the non-unitary approach as recommended in the Guide, it would face the same choice.
After discussion, the Working Group agreed that the current presentation of the material with a discussion of the unitary and the non-unitary approach to acquisition financing devices should be preserved.
As a result,States that adopt the non-unitary approach will also face a possible competition between providers of acquisition financing.
If the non-unitary approach was treated as an alternative to the unitary approach, the substantive results of the two approaches were broadly the same.
Ms. Walsh(Canada) expressed concern that the terminology used in the non-unitary approach failed to respect the concept of retention-of-title financing and lease financing.
Nonetheless, the non-unitary approach will, if implemented as recommended in the Guide(see recommendation 197), produce an efficient enforcement regime for acquisition financing transactions.
The Chairperson asked whether the delegation of Canada was proposing that all the recommendations in the non-unitary approach section should be redrafted to reflect a property-based terminology.
That said, even when States adopt a non-unitary approach to acquisition financing transactions, they should design the regime to reflect the functional equivalence principle see recommendation 185.