Примеры использования Optional protocol procedure на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Current difficulties with the Optional Protocol procedure and possible solutions;
The Committee had also adopted final decisions on 154 communications under the Optional Protocol procedure.
Under its optional protocol procedure, the Human Rights Committee had received a total of 27 communications.
The Committee is concerned at the apparently low level of awareness amongst the public of the provisions of the Covenant and the Optional Protocol procedure.
That procedure could not be compared to an optional protocol procedure since the Commission was an intergovernmental body.
On the interpretation of article 4 of the Covenant, reference is made to the Committee's practice under the reporting and Optional Protocol procedures.
Under the Optional Protocol procedure, the Committee adopted 41 Views on communications, and declared 12 communications inadmissible.
The delegation should explain why the Views adopted by the Committee under the Optional Protocol procedure had only been implemented in 5 out of 11 cases.
Under the Optional Protocol procedure, it adopted 22 Views on communications, declared 7 communications admissible and 17 inadmissible.
Since September 2008, the Committee had adopted Views on 95 communications under the Optional Protocol procedure, and had declared 14 communications admissible and 53 inadmissible.
Under the Optional Protocol procedure, it adopted 32 Views on communications and declared 4 communications admissible and 31 inadmissible.
The Committee on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities is already establishing important jurisprudence through its Concluding Observations andexamination of individual cases through its Optional Protocol procedure.
An optional protocol procedure under ICESCR would therefore complement the existing complaint mechanisms covering economic, social and cultural rights.
On the merits, the Committee reiterated its jurisprudence that the Optional Protocol procedure relates to alleged violations of individual rights, set out in articles 6 to 27 of the Covenant.
For that purpose, the Committee will submit a list of issues prior to reporting to the Stateparty in due course, since the State party has agreed to report to the Committee under the Optional Protocol procedure.
Under the Optional Protocol procedure, the Committee adopted Views on 151 communications, and declared 1 communication admissible and 12 inadmissible.
When entrusted with a quasi-judicial oversight responsibility in the framework of an optional protocol procedure, the Committee would need to take into consideration that margin of appreciation of States parties.
Under an optional protocol procedure the State party concerned retains the final decision as to what will be done in response to any views adopted by the Committee;
The Committee recalled that a State party is under an obligation to investigate seriously allegations of violations of the Covenant made under the Optional Protocol procedure, and to forward the outcome of investigations to the Committee, in detail and without undue delay.
The argument that an optional protocol procedure would be appropriate only in the case of serious violations of human rights or"serious international crimes" was rejected.
Thanks to the work of the newly established Petitions Team in the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, the backlog in dealing withcommunications has not increased, but further resources are needed for the expeditious handling of communications under the Optional Protocol procedure.
However, I attach more relevance to the fact that the Optional Protocol procedure always is between two parties, i.e. one or more individuals and a State party to the Optional Protocol. .
Since the entry into force of the Optional Protocol to the Covenant, a total of 1,799 communications had been registered; since September 2006,the Committee had adopted Views on 88 communications under the Optional Protocol procedure, and had declared 15 communications admissible and 55 inadmissible.
In this connection, the Committee recalled its jurisprudence that, under the Optional Protocol procedure, it cannot examine in abstracto the compatibility with the Covenant of the laws and practice of a State. Views in communication No. 61/1979, Leo Hertzberg et al. v. Finland, para.
Other Committee members made presentations on the Committee's relations with States parties under the reporting procedure, the Committee's contribution to an emerging universal human rights jurisprudence under the Optional Protocol procedure, and the importance of the contribution of non-governmental organizations to the Committee's activities.
Through the vehicle of the Optional Protocol procedure on individual communications, the Committee was making a valuable contribution to the understanding of the provisions of the Convention and the related obligations of States parties and was enhancing State accountability for the protection and promotion of women's human rights.
With regard to the State party's objection that the author has not identified the articles of the Covenant he claims have been violated, the Committee affirms its jurisprudence that it is not necessary for authors to specifically invoke articles of the Covenant;a/ under the Optional Protocol procedure authors are, however, required to submit the relevant facts and to substantiate their allegations.
In keeping with this view, in its consideration of a number of individual communications under the Optional Protocol procedure, the Human Rights Committee stated that the author in a case concerning the enforced disappearance of her daughter had the right to know what had happened to her.
A total of 92 communications were registered under the Optional Protocol and by the end of the seventy-eighth session, a total of 256 communications were pending, more than ever before(see chap. V). While the Petitions Team in the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights has worked to ensure thatthe backlog in dealing with communications does not increase, the Committee reiterates that additional resources are required to guarantee the expeditious handling of communications under the Optional Protocol procedure.
It noted the State party's criticism referred to in paragraph 4.2 above but recalled that, under the Optional Protocol procedure, it was not necessary for an individual who claims to be a victim of a violation of any of the rights set forth in the Covenant explicitly to invoke the articles of the Covenant.