Примеры использования Organizations of a universal character на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The same applied to other international organizations of a universal character.
This categorization was also not used in the conventions on diplomatic and consular relations, on special missions andon the representation of States in their relations with international organizations of a universal character.
In the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character, concluded in Vienna on 14 March 1975, the settlement of disputes regime is provided in articles 84 and 85.
In 1978, Ukraine ratified the 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character.
The Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character, adopted on 14 March 1975, sets out in its article 1 the various categories of persons who are governed by the legal regime it establishes.
Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character.
This Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character establishes a regime of immunity from jurisdiction applicable to the persons mentioned above, which it bases on the nature of the relationship between the persons and the State and, in particular, on the nature of the functions they perform within the mission or delegation.
Such policy is also contrary to the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character of 14 March 1975.
The 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character is not significant in this regard, because, after defining international organizations as"intergovernmental organizations", article 1 defined"internationalorganizations of a universal character", to which the scope of the Convention was limited according to article 2.
The Convention also took into account the work embodied in the 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character.
In conclusion, stressing the importance of a rapid entry into force of the 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character, she noted that, up to that date, it had been ratified by 30 States but would not enter into force until it had gathered 35 ratifications or accessions.
She also urged all Member States to accede to the relevant Conventions,particularly the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character.
It would seem appropriate to adopt the definition used in the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character, as well as in the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations, that is, that" international organization" means an" intergovernmental organization. .
Likewise, they are contrary to the letter andspirit of the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character of 14 March 1975.
In conventions on diplomatic relations, consular relations, special missions,representation of States in their relations with international organizations of a universal character and on the jurisdictional immunities of States and their property, there are similar provisions, whereby the initiation of proceedings by a subject enjoying immunity precludes him from invoking immunity from jurisdiction in respect of any counterclaim directly connected with the principal claim.
Likewise, they are contrary to the letter andsprit of the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character of 14 March 1975.
This concise definition was reproduced in article I( 1)( 1)of the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character of 14 March 1975, article 2( 1)( n) of the Vienna Convention on Succession of States in respect of Treaties of 23 August 1978, and article 2( 1)( i) of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties between States and International Organizations or between International Organizations of 21 March 1986.
Likewise, those restrictions are contrary to the letter andthe spirit of the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character, of 14 March 1975.
Calls upon all States that have not done so, in particular those which are host to international organizations or to conferences convened by, orheld under the auspices of, international organizations of a universal character, to consider as soon as possible the question of ratifying, or acceding to, the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character;
She urged all States Members that had not yet done so to ratify the relevant international instruments,particulary the 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character.
As has already been noted, article 21 of the 1969 Convention on Special Missions and article 50 of the 1975 Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character single out, in addition to Heads of State, Heads of Government and ministers for foreign affairs, yet another category of persons possessing special status under international law:"persons of high rank.
Persons enjoying a legal status governed by the Vienna Conventions on Diplomatic Relations of 1961 and 1963, the Convention of 1969 on Special Missions orthe Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character of 1975.
Similarly, with respect to delegations sent to international conferences sponsored by an international organization of a universal character, the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character specifies, in its article 50, that the immunities accorded to them by international law are an adjunct to those that international law grants to the Head of State, the Head of Government, the Minister for Foreign Affairs or other person of high rank.
Mr. NATHAN(Israel), explaining his delegation's position on the draft decision just adopted,said that the matter to which it referred had been taken up in the context of the 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character.
Likewise, they are contrary to the letter andspirit of the Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character and to the international rules recognized by customary law.
As regards the immunity of State officials from foreign national criminal jurisdiction, the corresponding provisions on this subject of the 1961 Vienna Convention on Diplomatic Relations, the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, the 1969 Convention on Special Missions, the 1973 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Crimes against Internationally Protected Persons, including Diplomatic Agents, andthe 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character are well known.
The Special Rapporteur, while recognizing the merits of that approach,also mentioned as an alternative course the one taken in the 1975 Vienna Convention on Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character, which provides for the settlement of disputes through consultations and conciliation.
The Commission had already reached this conclusion concerning the staff of diplomatic missions in preparing the draft articles on diplomatic relations, which it then drew upon in preparing the draft articles on consular relations, special missions andState representatives in their relations with international organizations of a universal character.
The policy was discriminatory and politically motivated and contravenes the obligations of the host country contained in the Headquarters Agreement and instruments relating to privileges and immunities,as well as the 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in Their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character.
Similarly worded provisions on waiver of immunity can be found in the 1963 Vienna Convention on Consular Relations(art. 45, para. 2), the 1969 Convention on Special Missions(art. 41, para. 2) andthe 1975 Vienna Convention on the Representation of States in their Relations with International Organizations of a Universal Character art. 31, para. 2, and art. 61, para. 2.