Примеры использования Pimentel teixeira на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Concerning the author andthe family of Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira.
Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira died at 7 p.m. on 16 November 2002.
The Committee therefore is of the view that the death of Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira must be regarded as maternal.
Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira received oxygen, Cimetidina, Mannitol, Decadron and antibiotics.
On 16 November 2002, Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's mother visited her.
Alyne da Silva Pimentel Teixeira, a Brazilian national of African descent, was born on 29 September 1974.
The preventable maternal death of Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira clearly exemplifies this failure.
The doctors at the health centre contacted both public and private hospitals with superior facilities in order totransfer Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira.
The hospital staff sent Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's mother to the health centre to retrieve her medical records.
Her mother and husband did not visit the health centre that day because they relied on assurances given by phone that Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira was well.
Another doctor examined Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira in the maternity ward and could not detect a foetal heartbeat.
The State party has routinely failed to provide adequate judicial remedies for women from vulnerable groups,such as Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira and her family.
There were no means of transporting Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira to that hospital because it did not want to use its only ambulance.
There are two specific informational problems related to death certificates,both of which are likely factors leading to Brazil's misclassification of Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's death as non-maternal.
On 11 February 2003, Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's husband filed a claim against the health-care system for material and moral damages.
Provide appropriate reparation, including adequate financial compensation, to the author andto the daughter of Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira commensurate with the gravity of the violations against her;
Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's pregnancy is not explicitly mentioned on her death certificate, and the phrase"digestive haemorrhage" does not link her pregnancy to her death.
On 17 November 2002, at the request of the hospital, Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's mother again went to the health centre to retrieve her daughter's medical documents.
Upon Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's initial presentation at the health centre on 11 November 2002, medical professionals should have diagnosed and treated her for intrauterine foetal death, based on her urgent symptoms.
The author submits that the State party violated the rights of Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira under article 2(c) of the Convention by failing to ensure the effective protection of women's rights.
On 11 November 2002, Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira went to the Casa de Saúde Nossa Senhora da Glória de Belford Roxo(the health centre) suffering from severe nausea and abdominal pain.
The State party refers to the finding of the technical visit report of the Rio de Janeiro Audit Department which concluded that the failures in the medical assistance provided to Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira did not fall under discrimination against women, but rather deficient and low-quality service provision to the population, resulting in the facts described.
They claim that Alyne da Silva Pimentel Teixeira is a victim of a violation by the State party of her right to life and health under articles 2 and 12 of the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination against Women.
The author challenges the assessment of the State party, according to which Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's death was non-maternal in nature, resulting from a so-called"digestive haemorrhage.
The author alleges that Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira should have had surgery immediately after her labour was induced in order to remove the afterbirth and placenta, which had not been fully expelled during the process of delivery as they normally are, and which may have caused her haemorrhaging and complications and, ultimately, her death.
The author challenges the reasoning of the State party,according to which the communication does not offer a single link between Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's gender and the possible medical errors committed and therefore they do not fall within the definition of discrimination set out in the Convention.
Instead it admitted that Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira's vulnerable condition required individualized medical treatment, which was not forthcoming owing to a potential failure in the medical assistance provided by a private health institution, caused by professional negligence, inadequate infrastructure and lack of professional preparedness.
The Committee therefore concludes that Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira was not ensured appropriate services in connection with her pregnancy.
In such circumstances,the Committee concludes that Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira was discriminated against, not only on the basis of her sex, but also on the basis of her status as a woman of African descent and her socio-economic background.
The Committee notes the author's claim that Ms. da Silva Pimentel Teixeira suffered from multiple discrimination, being a woman of African descent and on the basis of her socio-economic background.