Примеры использования Prosecution motion на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Minutes later… you granted a prosecution motion.
A subsequent Prosecution motion to call rebuttal witnesses was dismissed.
During the reporting period, the President also issued one decision regarding a prosecution motion and three other confidential rulings.
The Chamber granted the prosecution motion, and the defence requested certification to appeal the decision.
The trial wasconducted over 81 days. On 13 May 2003, the Chamber denied the Prosecution motion to call evidence in rebuttal.
A prosecution motion drew attention to the practical difficulties of implementing rule 94 ter of the Rules on affidavit evidence.
The Chamber is currently seized of a prosecution motion to reopen its case-in-chief.
A Prosecution motion to assign Defence Counsel to the Accused on the grounds of obstruction of the proceedings by the accused and witness interference is pending before the Trial Chamber since July 2008.
The Chamber is currently considering a prosecution motion to add five alibi rebuttal witnesses in August and September 2010.
The Office of the Prosecutor concluded all investigations in regard to this country,including those related to four cases that were deferred on 25 September 2003 by a Trial Chamber after a hearing on a prosecution motion.
In November 2010, the Chamber granted a Prosecution motion to add to its exhibit list the notebooks of Ratko Mladić and other relevant materials.
In the Ngirabatware case, assigned to Trial Chamber II for pre-trial proceedings, the Chamber has issued ten written decisions during the reporting period,including a decision partially granting a Prosecution motion to amend the Indictment.
Most recently, the pre-appeal Judge on 1 October 2009 granted a Prosecution motion for a 75-day extension to 16 January 2010 for filing its respondent's briefs.
The decision on both prosecution motions was issued on 30 March 2004.On 11 May 2004, the Appeals Chamber filed its decision on the prosecution motion to strike out portions of Mr. Kordić's reply filed on 13 April 2004.
On 17 May 2005, the Chambers took its first decision on an 11bis referral,whereby they granted the prosecution motion to transfer the Stankovic case to Bosnia and Herzegovina.
In April 2004, the Trial Chamber ruled on a prosecution motion to admit 252 facts that were the subject of prior adjudication by Trial Chambers in three other cases.
Mr. Naletilić filed his Appeal Brief on 15 September 2003, andre-filed it on 10 October 2003 following a decision of 3 October 2003 by the pre-appeal judge in response to a prosecution motion regarding defects in the Appeal Brief.
On 27 September 2000, Trial Chamber III rendered a decision on two prosecution motions for judicial notice of adjudicated facts, granting the motions in respect of 45 facts.
Decision on the prosecution motion for a temporary stay of execution of the decision of 5 October 1998 relating to defects in the form of the indictment(17 May 2000), Prosecutor v. Kabiligi and Ntabakuze(ICTR-97-34-I)(Judge Dolenc) decided on briefs.
The start of the trial had beenscheduled for mid-December 2009, but on 9 December the Trial Chamber ordered a postponement by at least two months because of a prosecution motion to amend the indictment and add significant new charges.
On 19 April 2004, the Trial Chamber granted the prosecution motion to withdraw the indictment following the publication of the agreed statement and terminated the proceedings against Jovanović.
The appeals stemmed from the composition of Trial Chambers that had been reconstituted by the President of the Tribunal for the purpose of hearing Prosecution motions for amendment of the indictments and Prosecution motions for joinder of the indictments.
The Chamber granted the Prosecution motion, and the Defence requested certification to appeal this decision, which was granted by the Trial Chamber in late April 2010 and which is pending before the Appeals Chamber.
Trial proceedings in the case In the matter of contempt arising from the case of Prosecutor v. Charles Taylor are currently under way. On 19 July 2012, the Decision on the prosecution motion for the Trial Chamber to summarily deal with contempt of the Special Court and for urgent interim measures was issued.
The Trial Chamber is currently seized of recent Prosecution motions for the hearing of additional evidence from witnesses who already testified or were considered unavailable to testify due to serious health problems.
Following the arrest of Stojan Župljanin, the Prosecution moved for a joinder of the case against Mićo Stanišić with that of Stojan Župljanin. On 23 September 2008, the Chamber granted leave to the Prosecution to join the two cases andfurther granted in part a Prosecution motion to amend the Indictment.
The Trial Chamber has granted several Prosecution motions for judicial notice of adjudicated facts and is considering others, together with applications to admit into evidence the testimony of approximately 30 witnesses without requiring them to appear for cross-examination.
With regard to the decision on the merits, the Appeals Chamber(Judge May presiding, Judge Wang, Judge Hunt, Judge Bennouna and Judge Robinson) on 4 February 1999, by a majority of four to one(Judge Robinson dissenting), refused the appeal relating to the decision on the Defence motion andallowed the appeal in respect of the decision on the Prosecution motion.
The prosecution motion was supported by an understanding between the parties whereby the accused agreed to publish a written statement acknowledging full personal and professional responsibility for publishing the details of a protected witness in violation of protective measures orders issued by the Trial Chamber.
Until recently, the Prosecution case has been expected to close by the winter adjournment, after 15 months; however,the Chamber in September granted a Prosecution motion to add relevant parts of the military notebooks of Ratko Mladić to its list of potential exhibits, the originals of which were only provided to the Prosecution in May 2010.