Примеры использования Provision might на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
That provision might be worded as follows.
Since article 2, paragraph 3(a), andarticle 4 cover GMOs, the provision might be redundant(at least for Parties);
Such a provision might also be included into the Convention or into a comment thereto.
However, it was pointed out that such a provision might not be applicable in certain jurisdictions.
Provision might also be made to convene an extraordinary meeting of NPT States parties.
She was concerned that that provision might serve to legitimize child marriage.
This provision might oblige the authorities to provide members of the media and public with such information promptly.
The Chairperson suggested that such a provision might be included in article 1 of the rules on transparency.
However, as the prohibition of torture was absolute and must be respected in all circumstances, such a provision might not be necessary.
It was stated that that provision might be limited to consumer-protection legislation.
He noted that, in document A/CN.9/406, paragraph 49, the Working Group expressed concern that the provision might not cover telexes and telegrams.
It was observed that this provision might lead to an unjustifiable restriction of competition.
Nearly all the countries studies have provisions regarding the temporary entry of corporate trainees,in many cases not subject to the employment test, these provision might also be bound.
However, this provision might need more elaboration in order to avoid any further ambiguities.
Others expressed doubts andwere of the view that the provision might be regarded as covered by article 14 a.
Such a provision might be based on draft article 18, taking into account the proposals made in the Working Group.
With respect to subparagraph(c), the view was expressed that the provision might need to spell out more clearly the facts which should not be omitted from the certificate.
Such a provision might facilitate recovery by the principal of losses suffered in the event that a claim is paid without there having been a breach of the underlying obligation.
Concerning the reservation on article 20.1,his Government still considered that that provision might conflict with the right to freedom of expression provided for under article 19.
Such a provision might reassure lenders and sponsors that they would not be penalized, for instance, by inaction or error on the part of the host Government or its agents.
If reparation in such cases was not limited to assurances andguarantees of non-repetition, the provision might encourage States to seek the other forms of reparation listed in article 42.
Such a provision might have advantages in promoting legal certainty, but it was not clear that a lack of objections could cure the nullity of an impermissible reservation.
Regarding article 16, the Government did not consider itself bound by paragraph 1(e) insofar as that provision might be interpreted as imposing an obligation on Malta to legalize abortion.
That provision might induce States to modify pre-existing legal relationships or even, in some circumstances, to enact legislation that disregarded the principle of non-retroactivity.
In response, it was said that if only the term"documented" were used, that provision might be interpreted in a very restrictive way as only applying where an agreement was concluded in writing.
It was felt that such a provision might exceed the aim of the Model Law, which should be limited to providing that electronic communications would achieve the same degree of legal certainty as paper-based communications.
Delegates from countries without a single procedure expressed concern that establishing such a provision might actually hinder their ability to provide protection and stressed the need for flexibility.
It was explained that the provision might otherwise lead to misuse, as unlimited discretion was given to the procuring entity to decide which suppliers or contractors parties to the framework agreement were capable of delivering the subject matter of the procurement.
While there was general support for the inclusion of a provision along the lines of draft paragraph(5),it was stated that the provision might require further elaboration, particularly as regards the notion of“authentication”.
It was also understood that part of that provision might be utilized to cover unforeseen costs, if the President of the Tribunal considered it necessary to do so.