Примеры использования Response to its letter на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Group awaits a response to its letter.
However, at the time of the Board's final audit, UNDP had not yet received any response to its letter.
The Panel also requested a response to its letter of 13 October 2008 requesting information related to the travel ban and assets freeze.
The Group has not received a response to its letter.
The Panel received a letter of acknowledgement from the Permanent Representative of Guinea to the United Nations on 30 September 2011, butdid not receive a response to its letter.
Having received the Government's response to its letter of September 2011 more than one year later, in November 2012, the Committee stressed that the Government had the responsibility to provide the Committee with the requested information fully and in a timely manner.
Once again, the Embassy did not receive any response to its letter.
The Committee considered a reply from the Government of Belarus received on 22 July 2010 in response to its letter, further to information provided by a Ukrainian non-governmental organization, Ecoclub, regarding a proposed activity in Belarus close to the border with Lithuania.
The secretariat informed the Committee that Lithuania had provided such an explanation in response to its letter.
REPORT TO THE COUNTER-TERRORISM COMMITTEE(CTC) IN RESPONSE TO ITS LETTER OF 27 SEPTEMBER 2002-10-07.
The secretariat communicated the decision to Greece in 2012 and received a progress report in response to its letter.
The Committee considered a reply from the Government of Portugal of 31 October 2013 in response to its letter of 23 September 2013 to the minister responsible for environmental matters.
The secretariat informed the Committee that it had communicatedthe decision to the Netherlands and that it had received a response to its letter.
The secretariat reported that it had not received any reply from the Government of Turkmenistan in response to its letter of 15 March 2004 concerning the new Turkmen Law on Public Associations.
The secretariat informed the Committee that it had communicated the decision to Iceland andhad received information in response to its letter.
The Committee considered a reply from the Government of Ukraine, received on 11 June 2013 in response to its letter(of 25 March 2013), and the additional information provided by Ukraine on 26 August 2013.
The secretariat had informed the Committee that it had communicated the decision to Denmark andhad received a written report in response to its letter.
Bull, and Foreign Affairs Ministry Councillor, Krubo Kollie, on 12 March 2009 to obtain a response to its letter and to ascertain why diplomatic passports had been issued to Mr. Snowe and Ms. Reffell.
The Panel wrote a letter on 20 December 2008 to the Permanent Mission of Liberia to the United Nations requesting further details on other passports issued to Liberians and reiterating the request to receive copies of photographs, where available. The Panel met with Deputy Foreign Affairs Minister, William V. S. Bull, and Foreign Affairs Ministry Councillor,Krubo Kollie, on 12 March 2009 to obtain a response to its letter and to ascertain why diplomatic passports had been issued to Mr. Snowe and Ms. Reffell.
The Committee considered a reply from the Government of the Republic of Moldova received on 16 August 2010 in response to its letter, further to information provided by the secretariat regarding a proposed activity in the Republic of Moldova close to the borders with Romania and Ukraine.
The Committee considered a reply from the Government of Romania received on 18 February 2013 in response to its letter of 2 October 2012.
The Committee noted the information from the European Commission received on 17 August 2011 in response to its letter of 23 June 2011 regarding the potential conflicts between the Convention's procedures for the review of compliance and the European Union's legislation on dispute settlements article 344 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union.
In 2012, thus far the Panel has received nine communications from Member States in response to its letters on compliance-related issues.
It welcomed the comprehensive andtimely reply received on 16 August 2011 from the Government of Romania, in response to its letter of 23 June 2011 requesting information on the EIA for the proposed installation, as well as clarifications on whether the Government of Romania had taken the necessary legal, administrative and other measures to implement the provisions of the Convention.
It reviewed the clarifications received from the Governments of Belgium, the Netherlands, Norway, Spain andthe United Kingdom in response to its letters of 17 December 2013.
The Committee took note of the letter from the Government of Ukraine received on 30 August 2011, in response to its letter of 23 June 2011 requesting information on the environmental impact assessment for a planned activity in Ukraine, close to the border with Belarus and Poland, as well as clarification on whether the Government of Ukraine had taken the necessary legal, administrative and other measures to implement the provisions of the Convention.
In 2011, the Panel received 20 communications from Member States in response to its letters on compliance-related issues.
In reply to these communications, the Committee received a letter dated 6 October 2009 from the reporting State, two letters from another State concerned dated 17 September 2009 and 9 October 2009, respectively, one letter each from three other States concerned dated 30 October 2009, 2 November 2009 and 13 November 2009, respectively, as well as a note verbale from a sixth State concerned dated 10 November 2009. On 5 November 2009,the Committee addressed a further letter to the reporting State in response to its letter of 6 October 2009.
In 2011, the Panel received 17 communications from Member States in response to its letters on compliance-related issues.