Примеры использования Restitution programmes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Development of restitution programmes 60- 61 14.
Guidelines: specific approaches to the design, implementation andenforcement of housing and property restitution programmes, including.
Discriminatory restitution programmes.
Restitution programmes can also enhance development aims by means of concrete instruments, such as titles.
Implementation of restitution programmes 65 15 continued.
These included secondary occupation, property destruction, loss ordestruction of property, ineffectual institutions and discriminatory restitution programmes.
Oversight of restitution programmes 62- 64 15.
States shall ensure that the rights of tenants, social occupancy rights holders and other legitimate occupants or users of housing, land orproperty are recognized within restitution programmes.
A critical issue for restitution programmes is the return to land.
The international community, as represented by the United Nations,has an important role to play in ensuring the success of housing and property restitution programmes simply by adequately fulfilling its peace-keeping role.
Throughout the world, housing and property restitution programmes have represented a dramatic advance in the actual implementation of human rights norms.
Threats or attacks against officials andagencies carrying out restitution programmes should be fully investigated and prosecuted.
Detailed information on land restitution programmes and the provision of infrastructures such as housing, electricity and schools was contained in the written replies.
Peacekeeping allows for the stabilization of conflict situations,paving the way for housing and property restitution programmes to be implemented and, perhaps even more importantly, enforced.
Discriminatory restitution programmes may also manifest themselves in unanticipated ways, especially in situations where the status quo ante itself discriminated against particular groups.
Much can be learned from this experience regarding how best to implement housing and property restitution programmes in sensitive, and potentially unstable, post-conflict situations.
Discriminatory restitution programmes further entrench social divisions and animosities, and are counter to post-conflict resolution, peacebuilding, as well as to fundamental human rights principles and international legal obligations.
Institutional strength and political will are inevitably crucial factors, and restitution programmes may succeed or fail solely on the strength and capacity of existing institutions.
That restitution programmes have been implemented in varying situations with varying results is at least partly attributable to the lack of a comprehensive and universal approach to restitution policy, informed by international human rights law.
If no official documentation is available, the ability to implement restitution programmes effectively is substantially hindered, necessitating a formal investigation and verification procedures.
While housing and property restitution is necessary to post-conflict resolution and peacebuilding, restitution programmes cannot be properly implemented under conditions which are overly volatile and unstable.
The success and effectiveness of housing and property restitution programmes also demands that the international organizations fulfil their peacekeeping obligations, so as to maintain stable domestic situations wherein appropriate restitution programmes may be successfully implemented and enforced, including the protection of property records.
As with the application of discriminatory abandonment laws,Governments may design and implement restitution programmes which favour certain groups, all the while barring others from returning to their own homes.
When properly implemented, housing and property restitution programmes are indispensable to postconflict resolution and to creating a durable peace, as they are essential components of the right to reparations for past human rights violations as well as the right to return.
This preliminary study presents an overview of selected housing and property restitution programmes which were instituted in several countries as a result of internal conflict and mass displacement.
The success and effectiveness of housing and property restitution programmes also demands that the international community fulfil its peace-keeping obligations, so as to maintain stable domestic situations wherein appropriate restitution programmes may be successfully implemented and enforced.
Such a contribution would lend itself to the practical implementation of housing and property restitution programmes by offering specific policy recommendations and protocols for how best to overcome common obstacles.
The underlying principles on which all housing and property restitution programmes must be based, inter alia, the principles of non-discrimination and equality of all parties and the principle of safe and dignified return;
Acceptable and effective responses to many of the common obstacles to housing and property restitution programmes, including secondary occupation, loss or destruction of property records and the destruction of property;
Convinced also that the implementation of successful housing,land and property restitution programmes, as a key element of restorative justice, contributes to effectively deterring future situations of displacement and building sustainable peace.