Примеры использования Return to sri lanka на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The complainant claims that he cannot return to Sri Lanka, from where he fled during the civil war.
The complainant is Mr. R.T., a Sri Lankan national of Tamil origin,currently residing in Switzerland pending his return to Sri Lanka.
He therefore submits that his forced return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by Australia of article 3 of the Convention.
Should the Committee find the complaint admissible, the State party argues that the complainant has not established that her return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation of article 3 of the Convention.
They claim that forcible return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation of articles 3 and 16 of the Convention against Torture by Canada.
Furthermore, the complainant's submissions do not support his claim that the Sri Lankan Government will acquiesce to the LTTE carrying out acts of torture upon his return to Sri Lanka.
He claims that his forcible return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
Counsel submits that in view of the two arrests of the complainant with regard to the Kolonawa bomb blast, there is a real chance that he would be arrested again should he return to Sri Lanka.
He claims that his forcible return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by the Netherlands of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
It endorses the arguments advanced by the Federal Office for Refugees and the Asylum Review Commission, and concludes that the author has failed to substantiate that he would be at a real andpersonal risk of being subjected to torture upon return to Sri Lanka.
He claims that his forced return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by Finland of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment.
While conceding that the complainant was detained at the Pettah police station in Colombo from 31 January to 22 February 1996,the State party considers this detention irrelevant for his claim that he is at risk of torture upon his return to Sri Lanka.
The complainant states that his return to Sri Lanka would heighten the suspicions of the local police that he was a member of the Tamil Tigers, so that he would be in danger of being summarily arrested and tortured on arrival in Colombo.
Concluding Observation[Paragraph 293]- Ensure the full and effective enforcement of the measures taken to protect women migrant workers, including preventing the activities of illegal employment agencies andensuring that insurance covers the disabled and jobless after they return to Sri Lanka.
On return to Sri Lanka on 21 November 1997, he was arrested by the Criminal Investigation Department(CID), but was released after paying a bribe. On 3 February 1998, the complainant was arrested as an LTTE suspect by the CID under the Prevention of Terrorism Act.
While not excluding that the complainant could be arrested andbeaten by the police upon return to Sri Lanka, the Commission concluded that no concrete risk of torture existed, as the Sri Lankan authorities could be reasonably expected to punish such incidents.
The State party also submits that the fact that the complainant returned to Sri Lanka without any adverse consequences after being refused asylum in Germany supports the view that he would not be personally at risk of being subjected to torture upon his return to Sri Lanka.
As to the possibility of the complainant suffering torture at the hands of the State upon his return to Sri Lanka, the Committee has taken due note of the complainant's claim that he was previously detained and tortured by members of the Sri Lankan army.
He also requested more details on the Government insurance and pension schemes set up for Sri Lankan migrant workers, including the number of workers who benefited from such schemes andhow the Government ensured that beneficiaries were informed of their rights on their return to Sri Lanka.
They claim that their forcible return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, since they would be at risk of being subjected to torture in Sri Lanka. .
It follows that, irrespective of whether a consistent pattern of gross, flagrant or mass violations of human rights can be said to exist in Sri Lanka, such existence would not as such constitute sufficient grounds for determining that the complainant would be in danger of being subjected to torture upon his return to Sri Lanka.
The complainant claims that his forcible return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by the State party of article 3 of the Convention, since he would face a high risk of torture if he were deported to that country, as a young single male Tamil who had previously been arrested and tortured several times as a suspected LTTE activist.
Counsel claims that, in view of the earlier treatment received by the petitioner at the hands of PLOTE and the Sri Lankan army,there are substantial grounds for believing that he would be personally in danger of being subjected to torture on return to Sri Lanka and, therefore, the Netherlands would be violating article 3 of the Convention if he were returned there.
The complainant claims that his forcible return to Sri Lanka would constitute a violation by Switzerland of article 3 of the Convention, since there are substantial grounds for believing that, as a young Tamil who was repeatedly arrested and interrogated by the authorities and militia groups, and whose brother was known to be an LTTE member, he would be subjected to torture upon return to Sri Lanka. .
On 10 September 2009, the author informed the Committee that she had received a threat during time she spent in India, between 13 June and 26 August 2009, andthat the danger had escalated since the family's return to Sri Lanka on the expiration of their visas. On 7 September 2009, the author's vehicle was chased by another car, when she was driving back from a court appearance.
In October 2001, he was returned to Sri Lanka.
UNHCR reintegration cash grant programme for refugees returning to Sri Lanka.
Audit of reintegration cash grant programme for refugees returning to Sri Lanka.
Migrant workers returning to Sri Lanka were entitled to the same social security benefits as other Sri Lankan citizens.
Had reparation been provided to the 13 Tamils returned to Sri Lanka and what steps had been taken to provide rehabilitation and health-care services for victims of torture?