Примеры использования Right of states to self-defence на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Saudi Arabia affirms the right of States to self-defence and the right of self-determination.
Reaffirms the content of Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, which mentions the inherent individual right of States to self-defence; and.
The treaty should not constrain the right of States to self-defence nor be seen as an international discriminatory instrument.
The preamble might also make a specific reference to Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations pertaining to the right of States to self-defence.
Some members acknowledged the right of States to self-defence but stressed the exercise of that right within the bounds of international law.
A future regime banning the use of land-mines will be achievable only if its tenets are compatible with the principles of sovereignty and the right of States to self-defence.
Emphasis was placed on the right of States to self-defence, as provided for in the Charter of the United Nations, article 51, and to self-determination.
For those reasons Costa Rica cannot endorse a deferral of action on draft resolution A/C.1/51/L.46 based on the argument that a paragraph must be included on the right of States to self-defence.
It was moreover unclear how that right could impinge on the right of States to self-defence and on their duty to maintain international peace and security.
In this connection, it is obvious that it is still more difficult to agree on global rules for legal transfers of all types of conventional weapons without jeopardizing legal trade and the right of States to self-defence.
It must be clearly established that no attempt is being made to affect or co-opt the right of States to self-defence and to maintain well-equipped and well-prepared armed forces.
The acknowledged right of States to self-defence should not be used as a pretext for indiscriminate arms production that is inconsistent with the principle it is meant to uphold and that ultimately aims merely to generate profits.
We must work on a gradual basis, avoiding the hasty adoption of a new international regime that would obstruct currentinternational disarmament priorities or would be based on non-objective criteria affecting the right of States to self-defence.
Recognizing the right of States to self-defence and participation in peacebuilding and peacekeeping operations, minimal international requirements for control of the arms trade need to be laid down in the treaty and made legally binding.
Since 1969 my country has been a signatory of the treaty for The Prohibition of Nuclear Weapons in Latin America and the Caribbean,also known as the Treaty of Tlatelolco and recognizes the right of States to self-defence and to preservation of their sovereignty.
However, it is also clear that the right of States to self-defence is accompanied by the responsibilities of States to prevent threats to peace and to ensure respect for international law, including human rights and humanitarian law.
This behaviour constitutes a grave escalation of a policy that has been and will certainly continue to be a threat to international peace and security,a policy that violates the right of States to self-defence, as enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations.
While we acknowledge the right of States to self-defence and the promotion of programmes in support of national interests, we call on them to do so responsibly, with respect for international public opinion and the protocols and conventions surrounding such developments.
We share, too,the deep reservations about a narrow statement in the opinion that could read as though it questions the right of States to self-defence against terrorism, despite all the evidence in law, Security Council resolutions and State practice to the contrary.
However it is also clear that the right of States to self-defence is accompanied by the responsibilities of States to prevent threats to peace and to ensure respect for international law, including human rights and humanitarian law.
The effort to combat the illegal arms trade raised many complex issues related to the distinction between the licit and illicit trade in weapons, the need to respect national sovereignty,the responsibility of States to provide security and the right of States to self-defence.
At the same time, we are convinced that future agreements should not limit the right of States to self-defence and the right of legal trade in arms. Agreements should be based on existing international criteria and principles of conventional weapons control.
Finally, with respect to the ongoing discussions on a future arms trade treaty, my delegation wishes to underline that an international legally binding instrument must take into consideration the concerns of all States andshould be consistent with the United Nations Charter, in particular Article 51, which enshrines the right of States to self-defence.
While recognizing the right of States to self-defence, in accordance with Article 51 of the Charter, it should also be recalled that States are obliged to comply with internationally legally binding obligations like arms embargoes and sanctions introduced by the resolutions of the Security Council.
Let me add my delegation's voice, with respect to the ongoing negotiations on a future arms trade treaty, to underline that the international legally binding instrument must be balanced, take the concerns of all States into consideration and be consistent with the Charterof the United Nations, in particular with Article 51, which enshrines the right of States to self-defence.
The arms trade treaty should reflect the right of States to self-defence, expressed in Article 51 of the Charter, as well as the right of States to seek and possess arms for self-defence purposes, in accordance with international law and other relevant standards.
Ecuador fully endorses the basic principles cited by the General Assembly as the grounds for adopting this resolution, which can be summed up as follows: the need to ensure the maintenance of international peace and security through effective arms control, disarmament and non-proliferation;the need to strike a balance between this principle and the right of States to self-defence; and the obligation to safeguard public safety and development.
The treaty should not prejudice the right of States to self-defence under Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations, which also implies that States have the legitimate right to acquire means for self-defence, including through the development, manufacture, acquisition and import of arms required to ensure their national defence.
Although enough resolutions have been adopted by the Security Council to enable the international community to force the aggressors to bowto the international will, the only resolution that the international community insists on implementing is an illegal one that defies the most basic principles of international legality and denies the right of States to self-defence, namely the Security Council resolution that imposed an arms embargo on the States of the former Yugoslavia.
Principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations, including,inter alia, the right of States to self-defence in accordance with Article 51; the sovereign equality of States; non-interference in the internal affairs of States; respect for territorial integrity and political independence; the settlement of disputes by peaceful means; respect for human rights; .