Примеры использования River uruguay на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay case.
Recently, the Court delivered its judgment concerning the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay case.
Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay. .
As the International Court of Justice has held in the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay) case.
Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay. .
The Court in January 2007 delivered a Judgment in the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay) case.
Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment of 20 April 2010.
During the period under review, the Court delivered one judgment,in the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay. .
The ruling in the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay case is a clear example of this.
Finally, from 14 September to 2 October 2009, the Court heard arguments on the merits in a case between Argentina and Uruguay, Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay.
The ruling in the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay), is a clear example of this fact.
Finds that the Eastern Republic of Uruguay has not breached its substantive obligations under Articles 35, 36 and 41 of the 1975 Statute of the River Uruguay;
Legal Adviser and Delegate-- Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina vs. Uruguay), International Court of Justice, The Hague, The Netherlands, 2007-2010.
By acting jointly through CARU, the Parties have established a real community of interests andrights in the management of the River Uruguay and in the protection of its environment.
The Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay case illustrates, therefore, the Court's continuing contribution to this constantly developing area of international law.
Proceedings were brought before the International Court of Justice as a case formally named Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay. .
In the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay), the Court made an Order with respect to the request for provisional measures submitted by Argentina.
They so highly appreciated their workmanship andskill that in July 1913 two ships"18 de Julio" and"Taongarupa" brought 300 families to the coast of the river Uruguay 164 kilometers from Montevideo.
Finally, on 13 July this year,the Court handed down its Order for the indication of provisional measures in the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay. .
Those allegations were made in respect ofboth the CMB mill, whose construction on the River Uruguay was ultimately abandoned, and the Orion mill, which is currently in operation.
On 13 July 2006 the Court rendered an Order on the request for the indication of provisional measures submitted by Argentina in the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay Argentina v. Uruguay. .
Cases such as Gabcíkovo-Nagymaros Project(Hungary/Slovakia) and Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay) have been submitted to the plenary Bench.
Delegate, Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay), provisional measure requested by Uruguay, International Court of Justice, The Hague, December 2006.
The International Court of Justice had previously placed the burden of proof on the applicant in Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay), Judgment of 20 April 2010, para. 162.
In the case concerning Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay(Argentina v. Uruguay), Argentina chose Raúl Emilio Vinuesa and Uruguay Santiago Torres Bernárdez to sit as judges ad hoc.
In May 2006, Argentina initiated proceedings against Uruguay concerning the construction of two pulp mills on the River Uruguay, which constitutes the border between the two States in that region.
The Administrative Commission of the River Uruguay is a body established under the Statute for the purpose of monitoring the river, including assessing the impact of proposed projects on the river. .
Early in May this year Argentina initiated proceedings against Uruguay concerning alleged violations by Uruguay of obligations under the Statute of the River Uruguay, a treaty signed by the two States in 1975.
Likewise, we would highlight the ruling in the Pulp Mills on the River Uruguay case and the advisory opinion regarding the Accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo, issued during the period under review.