Примеры использования Second sentence should be deleted на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The second sentence should be deleted.
Mr. PILLAI(Country Rapporteur) proposed that the second sentence should be deleted.
The second sentence should be deleted and the first sentence added to the beginning of paragraph 43.
He proposed that the second sentence should be deleted.
Mr. Iwasawa said that after hearing the discussion,he was becoming more inclined to suggest that the second sentence should be deleted.
In article 36, the second sentence should be deleted.
Mr. YALDEN said that,in view of the adoption of the new question 18, the second sentence should be deleted.
The CHAIRMAN proposed that the second sentence should be deleted, as it was merely descriptive.
None of the suggested formulations was appropriate and,if more plausible wording could not be found, the second sentence should be deleted.
He agreed, however, that the second sentence should be deleted.
Perhaps the second sentence should be deleted, or there should be a mention of the opposing view.
Consequently he proposed that the second sentence should be deleted.
He agreed that the second sentence should be deleted and the first sentence inserted at the beginning of paragraph 43.
After discussion, the Working Group agreed that the second sentence should be deleted.
The adjective"general" in the second sentence should be deleted and the last sentence should remain unchanged.
Mr. Amor said that the first sentence and part of the second sentence should be deleted.
He proposed that the second sentence should be deleted too, because it was presumptuous to describe the General Comment as an authoritative guideline.
Paragraph 17, the second part of the second sentence should be deleted;
The second sentence should be deleted since the obligation to mark or label dangerous or polluting goods is already covered by the general marking obligation in article 6, paragraph 3, second sentence. .
Mr. PRADO VALLEJO said he, too,agreed that the second sentence should be deleted and shared Mr. Bhagwati's concern.
In response, it was proposed that the first sentence was sufficient as drafted to state the general principle and that the second sentence should be deleted.
With respect to recommendation(90), the Working Group agreed that although the second sentence should be deleted, the content of the sentence should be reflected in the commentary.
After an exchange of views in which Mr. SHAHI, Mr. SICILIANOS, Mr. PILLAI and Mr. ABOUL-NASR took part, Mr. HERNDL(Country Rapporteur)proposed that the second sentence should be deleted.
He agreed with the representative of Mexico that the second sentence should be deleted, and suggested that the third sentence could be left to the secretariat to redraft as appropriate.
On the other hand, if it agreed that the text could be further amended through additions or clarifications,then he would maintain his view that the second sentence should be deleted.
It was suggested that the reference to the secured creditor in the second sentence should be deleted, as an intellectual property right could be abandoned only by the rights holder.
He therefore suggested that the second sentence should be deleted, apart from the words"who arrived in the Russian Federation in 1989-91", which could then be inserted in the third sentence between the words"the Meskhetians in Krasnodar Krai" and the words"are given residence registration.
Mr. SHAHI said that, in the interests of compromise,he would not object to retaining the first sentence of paragraph 17, but the second sentence should be deleted; otherwise, the same point might have to be made with regard to many other countries, and no two States could be considered by the same yardstick.
Those questions included: whether the reference to prequalification in the second sentence should be deleted as disqualification of the supplier for submission of false or inaccurate information during prequalification was covered in article 6(6); whether, at the end of the second sentence, reference should be made to the submission of incomplete information; whether the words"failed to reconfirm" should be made more clear.
Suggestions were made that, were article 15 to be retained, the second sentence should be deleted or clarified, in particular the words"entitles the principal or applicant.