Примеры использования Security assurances could на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
It was also expressed that security assurances could serve as an incentive to achieve universality.
What we find difficult to understand is how the conclusion of an international legal instrument on negative security assurances could pose a threat to the security of some countries.
Security assurances could only become a reality when nuclear weapons were eliminated; there would then be no need for a treaty.
The sponsors believe that the conclusion of effective arrangements on negative security assurances could constitute a major confidence-building measure between the nuclear-weapon and non-nuclear-weapon States, as well as among the nuclear-weapon States.
Security assurances could serve as incentives to forgo the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction and to achieve universality of the Treaty.
For the above reasons, the sponsors believe that the conclusion of effective arrangements on negative security assurances could constitute a major confidence-building measure in the current tense international situation between the nuclear and the non-nuclear-weapon States.
Negative security assurances could be an important measure pending the achievement of a world without nuclear weapons, but they can only be an interim measure toward that goal about which many have spoken in this Conference in recent weeks- a world that is free of nuclear weapons.
Lastly, as it has mentioned in the past,France believes that in-depth discussions on the issue of negative security assurances could, in the future, appropriately take place in a forum such as the Disarmament Commission, in which States not parties to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty are also represented.
Security assurances could be also provided the non-nuclear countries in the form of a Security Council resolution under which its permanent members would assume the obligation, in the event of nuclear aggression, to take adequate measures to protect the security of the non-nuclear States.
From this perspective, progress on negative security assurances could, I believe, ensure further progress on other matters included among the essential items currently under the Conference's consideration.
It was expressed that security assurances could play an important role in the NPT regime and serve as an incentive to forgo the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction.
Progress on negative security assurances could, I believe, ensure further progress on other matters included among the essential items currently under the Conference's consideration.
Likewise, the text on negative security assurances could have more closely reflected the relevant language in the 2010 NPT Review Conference Final Document NPT/CONF.2010/50 Vol.
It should also be recalled that security assurances could be pursued and entrenched by means of regional nuclear-weapon-free zones, such as those established under the South Pacific Nuclear-Free-Zone Treaty or the Treaty of Tlatelolco.
The sponsors believe that the conclusion of effective arrangements on negative security assurances could constitute a major confidence-building measure in the current tense international circumstances between nuclear and non-nuclear-weapon States, as well as amongst the nuclear-weapon States.
The sponsors believe that the conclusion of effective arrangements on negative security assurances could constitute a major confidence-building measure in the current tense international circumstances between nuclear and non-nuclear-weapon States, as well as among nuclear-weapon States.
The sponsors believe that the conclusion of effective arrangements on negative security assurances could constitute a major confidence-building measure in the current tense international circumstances between nuclear- and non-nuclear weapons States, as well as among nuclear-weapon States.
The sponsors believe that the conclusion of effective arrangements on negative security assurances could constitute a major confidence-building measure in the current tense international circumstances between the nuclear- and non-nuclear weapon States, as well as among the nuclear-weapon States.
The sponsors believe that the conclusion of effective arrangements on negative security assurances could first contribute a major confidence-building measure in the current tense international circumstances between nuclear and non-nuclear-weapon States, as well as among nuclear-weapon States.
Several speakers said that the opening of negotiations for the conclusion of an agreement on security assurances could help to prepare the ground for negotiations on the three(3) other fundamental issues on the agenda, namely the prevention of an arms race in outer space(PAROS), the conclusion of a treaty banning the production of fissile material for the production of weapons or other nuclear explosive devices(FMCT) and general nuclear disarmament.
Positive and negative security assurances can play an important role.
However, in a world of nuclear proliferation, negative security assurances can facilitate confidence-building.
Positive and negative security assurances can act as incentives for other States to abstain from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Positive and negative security assurances can play an important role in the NPT regime and can act as an incentive to forgo the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction.
Positive and negative security assurances can act as incentives for other States to abstain from acquiring nuclear weapons.
Positive and negative security assurances can play an important role in the nuclear non-proliferation and disarmament regime.
Positive and negative security assurances can play an important role: they can serve both as an incentive to forgo the acquisition of weapons of mass destruction and as a deterrent.
As previously stated in 1995 and 2010,we recognize the role that negative security assurances can play in strengthening the non-proliferation regime and enhancing regional and international security. .
The EU Strategy on Weapons of Mass Destruction indicates that positive and negative security assurances can play an important role in the NPT regime.
Thus, only a legally binding instrument on negative security assurances can prevent nuclear proliferation and enhance the security of our planet.