Примеры использования Selection and appointment of judges на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The proposal on the selection and appointment of judges was also useful.
The law guarantees the participation of the public in the selection and appointment of judges.
Procedure for the selection and appointment of judges and jurors.
The Special Rapporteur takes note of the variety of existing systems for the selection and appointment of judges worldwide.
It shows that procedures for the selection and appointment of judges as well as the termand security of their tenure are key factors to ensure the independence of judges. .
Likewise, in many other countries, the executive branch of power has a decisive say in the selection and appointment of judges.
The State party should ensure that the selection and appointment of judges, including to the Supreme Judicial Council, is transparentand that objective criteria provide equal opportunity for candidates.
According to the current Constitution, the National Council of the Judiciary is responsible for the selection and appointment of judges and procurators art. 150.
This implies taking responsibility for,inter alia, the selection and appointment of judges, the disciplinary system,and the internal organization of the judicial branch in view of the special nature of the jurisdictional function.
To that end, the State party might wish to consider, if it had not already done so,inviting the national bar associations to take part in the selection and appointment of judges to the State Security Court.
Regarding the selection and appointment of judges, the Secretary-General supports the Panel's recommendation to establish an Internal Justice Council to compile lists of candidates for appointment as judges in the Organization's internal justice system ibid., para. 173.
The National Council of the Judiciary is an independent and autonomous organ which is responsible for the selection and appointment of judges and procurators, except when the latter are elected by the people.
It is concerned by the lack of transparency regarding the selection and appointment of judges and members of the Supreme Judicial Council; that the principle of the independence of the judiciary is not respected by the organs outside the judiciary, including high-ranking government officials, nor fully applied within the judiciary; and by allegations of corruption within the justice system and lack of trust in the administration of justice, resulting in lack of public trust in the judiciary arts. 2 and 13.
The National Council of the Judiciary is an independent and autonomous organ which is responsible for the selection and appointment of judges and procurators, except when the latter are elected by the people.
Including knowledge of women's human rights and demonstrated commitment to the goal of gender equality should be considered as requirements in the selection and appointment of judges and justices.
With a view to ensuring the independence of the judiciary,further improving work relating to the selection and appointment of judges, and observing legal requirementsand principles of fairness in recommending highly-qualified and honest specialists for judgeships, a Presidential Decree on the establishment of a Supreme Board of Experts on Selection and Recommendation for Judgeships was issued on 4 May 2000.
Include knowledge of women's human rights and demonstrated commitment to the goal of gender equality as requirements in the selection and appointment of judges and justices at all levels.
The elements of judicial independence were analysed by the Special Rapporteur's predecessor,including the importance of judicial independence; the selection and appointment of judges and magistrates; the judicial budget; freedom of association and expression; the assignment of court cases; independence within the judiciary; tenure and non-removability; immunity; promotion; conditions of service; judicial salaries; human and material resources; and security and training.
During the judicial reform process, in March 2004 representatives of the executive and judicial branches as well as experts from the Council of Europe formed a joint Azerbaijan-Council of Europe working group on the independence, selection and appointment of judges and the assessment of their activities.
The Research Center under the Supreme Court in 2015-2016 conducted 3 research studies aimed at improving the legislation on the selection and appointment of judges, as well as on ensuring opennessand transparency of the judiciary activities.
For example, in April 2016, a trip of the head of the Secretariat of the Commission to the Republicof Korea was organized, where the activities of the judicial system, selection and appointment of judges, terms of officeand ethical conduct of judges, disciplinary responsibility were examined.
In the process of analysis, the experience and selection mechanisms, recommendations and appointments for judges in France, Germany, the United States, Spain, Great Britain, Portugal and Russia were studied, the possibility of improving the selection and appointment of judges, as well as the introduction of legislative bases for appointing judges indefinitely after the successful completion of the first five-year term of office, etc. was considered.
Besides, currently the law is vague with regard to the procedure of the selection and appointment of the judges.
This led to greater awareness in the country of the need for theindependence of the judiciary, which should be guaranteed from the outset of a magistrate's career and throughout all selection and appointment processes of judges and magistrates.
In order to improve the selection of candidates and the appointment of judges and enforce observance of legal requirements when recommending qualified, erudite and highly moral experts for judicial posts, the said commission was transformed by the decree of the President of Uzbekistan of 4 May 2000 into the Supreme Qualifying Commission for the selection and recommendation of judges under the Office of the President of Uzbekistan.
The modalities for the selection and appointment of military judges vary from one country to another.
It is the opinion of the Special Rapporteur that it would be preferable for the Supreme Council of the Judiciary to exercise control over the selection and appointment of all judges.
The executive branch remains very influential in the selection and appointment procedures for judges. .
The Special Rapporteur considers that such institutes orjudicial academies should preferably be administered and run by an independent body in charge of the selection, appointment, promotion and disciplining of judges.
JS5 recommends that the Supreme Court be required to introduce transparent and impartial procedures for the selection, appointment and promotion of judges, as well as for their evaluation, in order to clean up the judiciary.