Примеры использования State or that organization на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
In draft guideline 1.1.6, the phrase“when that State or that organization expresses its consent to be bound by a treaty” should be deleted.
Such non-maintenance became operative in relation to a contracting State or organization only when notice of it had been received by that State or that organization.
A reservation may be formulated by a State or an international organization when that State or that organization expresses its consent to be bound in accordance with article 11 of the 1969 and 1986 Conventions on the Law of Treaties.”.
The withdrawal of a reservation becomes operative in relation to a contracting State or a contracting organization only when notice of it has been received by that State or that organization;
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization at the time when that State or that organization expresses its consent to be bound by a treaty by which its author purports to limit the obligations imposed on it by the treaty constitutes a reservation.
Subparagraph(a) of guideline 2.5.9 deliberately uses the plural("the other contracting States or contracting organizations") where article 22,paragraph 3(a), uses the singular"that State or that organization.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization at the time when that State or that organization expresses its consent to be bound by a treaty by which its author purports to limit the obligations imposed on it by the treaty constitutes a reservation.
Paragraph(a) of draft guideline 2.5.9[2.5.10] deliberately uses the plural("the other contracting States or international organizations") where article 22,paragraph 3(a), uses the singular"that State or that organization.
Interpretative declaration" means a unilateral statement, however phrased or named, made by a State or by an international organization whereby that State or that organization purports to specifyor clarify the meaning or scope of a treaty or of certain of its provisions.
Unless the treaty otherwise provides, or it is otherwise agreed, the withdrawal of a reservation becomes operative in relation to a contracting State or a contracting organization only when notice of it has been received by that State or that organization.
Interpretative declaration' means a unilateral declaration, however phrased or named, made by a State or by an international organization whereby that State or that organization purports to clarify the meaningor scope attributed by the declarant to the treaty or to certain of its provisions.
The overlap would only be partial, given the different conditions set by the two provisions, and especially the fact that according to draft article 15 the act committed by the member State or international organization need not be unlawful for that State or that organization.
Interpretative declaration" means a unilateral statement, however phrased or named, made by a State or by an international organization whereby that State or that organization purports to specify or clarify the meaning or scope attributed by the declarant to a treaty or to certain of its provisions.
Mutatis mutandis, these rules, for the reasons indicated above, may certainly be transposed to the competence to formulate reservations, on the understanding, of course, that the formulation of reservations by a person who cannot"be considered(…)as authorized to represent a State or an international organization for that purpose is without legal effect unless afterwards confirmed by that State or that organization.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or by an international organization whereby that State or that organization expresses its views on a treatyor on the subject matter covered by the treaty, without purporting to produce a legal effect on the treaty, constitutes a general statement of policy which is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
An objection formulated prior to the expression of consent to be bound by the treaty does not need to be formally confirmed by the objecting State or international organization at the time it expresses its consent to be bound if that State or that organization had signed the treaty when it had formulated the objection; it must be confirmed if the State or the international organization had not signed the treaty.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization when that State or that organization expresses its consent to be bound by a treaty by which that State or that organization purports to discharge an obligation pursuant to the treaty in a manner different from but equivalent to that imposed by the treaty constitutes a reservation.
An objection formulated prior to the expression of consent to be bound by the treaty does not need to be formally confirmed by the objecting State or international organization at the time it expresses its consent to be bound if that State or that organization was a signatory to the treaty when it formulated the objection; it must be confirmed if the State or international organization had not signed the treaty.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization when that State or that organization expresses its consent to be bound by a treaty by which that State or that organization purports to discharge an obligation pursuant to the treaty in a manner different from but equivalent to that imposed by the treaty constitutes a reservation.
Unless the treaty otherwise provides or the negotiating States and negotiating organizations or, as the case may be, the negotiating organizations have otherwise agreed, the provisional application of a treaty or a part of a treaty with respect to a State or an international organization shall be terminated if that State or that organization notifies the States and organizations with regard to which the treaty is being applied provisionally of its intention not to become a party to the treaty.
A unilateral statement made by a State or an international organization at the time when that State or that organization expresses its consent to be bound by a treaty and by which its author intends to limit the obligations imposed on it by the treaty and the rights which the treaty creates for the other parties constitutes a reservation, unless it adds a new provision to the treaty.”.
A unilateral statement, however phrased or named, formulated by a State or an international organization after initialling or signature butprior to entry into force of a bilateral treaty, by which that State or that organization purports to obtain from the other party a modification of the provisions of the treaty, does not constitute a reservation within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement made by a State or an international organization by which that State or that organization undertakes commitments going beyond the obligations imposed on it by a treaty does not constitute a reservation[and is governed by the rules applicable to unilateral legal acts], even if such a statement is made at the time of the expression by that State or that organization of its consent to be bound by the treaty.
A unilateral statement, however phrased or named, formulated by a State or an international organization after initialling or signature butprior to entry into force of a bilateral treaty, by which that State or that organization purports to obtain from the other party a modification of the provisions of the treaty to which it is subjecting the expression of its final consent to be bound, does not constitute a reservation within the meaning of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement made by a State or by an international organization whereby that State or that organization expresses its views on the treatyor on the subject area covered by the treaty without purporting to exclude or to modify the legal effect of its provisions, or to interpret it, constitutes neither a reservation nor an interpretative declaration[and is not subject to application of the law of treaties].”.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization after signature butprior to entry into force of a bilateral treaty, by which that State or that organization purports to obtain from the other party a modification of the provisions of the treaty in respect of which it is subordinating the expression of its final consent to be bound, does not constitute a reservation, however phrased or named.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization whereby that State or that organization indicates the manner in which it intends to implement a treaty at the internal level, without affecting its rights and obligations towards the other contracting States or contracting organizations, is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization whereby that State or that organization indicates the manner in which it intends to implement a treaty at the internal level, without purporting as such to affect its rights and obligations towards the other Contracting Parties, constitutes an informative statement which is outside the scope of the present Guide to Practice.
A unilateral statement formulated by a State or an international organization at the time when that State or that organization expresses its consent to be bound by a treaty, by which that State or that organization purports to discharge an obligation pursuant to the treaty in a manner different from, but considered by the author of the statement to be equivalent to that imposed by the treaty, constitutes a reservation.
Specially affects that State or that international organization; or.