Примеры использования State which makes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Any State which makes a reservation under this Convention may withdraw it at any time by a formal notification in writing addressed to the depositary.
In addition, as article 4 of the Covenant declares article 6 to be a non-derogable right, a State which makes a reservation to such a right is under a“heavy onus”. Ibid, para. 10.
Any State which makes a declaration under article 25 may withdraw it at any time by a formal notification in writing addressed to the depositary.
Unlike a promise, however, whose obligatoriness, as we shall see,is based on the intention of the declarant State or the State which makes the promise, an act of this kind becomes binding upon the State which performs it, and so prevents it from acting in a different manner, when the third State takes action to its own detriment.
A State which makes extradition conditional on the existence of treaties may, at its option, consider these conventions as a legal basis for extradition?
Any State which makes a declaration under articles 42 to 44 and 46 may withdraw it at any time by a formal notification in writing addressed to the depositary.
Any State which makes a declaration under this Convention may modify or withdraw it at any time by a formal notification in writing addressed to the depositary.
The State which makes the investigation contemplated in paragraph 1 shall promptly inform the said States Parties of its findings and shall indicate whether it intends to exercise jurisdiction.
Any State which makes one or more reservations shall notify the Secretary General of the Council of Europe of the relevant contents of its internal law or of any other relevant information.
The State which makes the preliminary inquiry contemplated in paragraph 2 of this article shall promptly report its findings to the said States and shall indicate whether it intends to exercise jurisdiction.
The State which makes the investigation contemplated in paragraph 1 of the present article shall promptly inform the said States Parties of its findings and shall indicate whether it intends to exercise jurisdiction.
The State which makes the preliminary inquiry contemplated in paragraph 2 of this article shall promptly report its findings to the said States and shall indicate whether it intends to exercise jurisdiction.
Since a State which makes a reservation to a multilateral convention commits itself only to the convention as so reserved, its successor State cannot, logically, succeed to the convention without reservations.
The State which makes the preliminary inquiry contemplated in paragraph 2 of this article shall promptly report its findings to the said States and shall indicate whether it intends to exercise jurisdiction. IMO Maritime Navigation Convention, article 7 6.
However, on the official web page of the Depositary of the Convention(untreaty.un. org)Poland is indicated as a state which made the aforementioned reservations.
A State which made an impermissible reservation could not be deemed to be a party to the treaty.
Moreover, a unilateral legal act, such as a promise, placed the State which made it under a legal obligation immediately that that act was performed.
However, as indicated in section 3.2(Assessment of the permissibility of reservations),the primary entity entitled to assess reservations to treaties was the State which made the reservation.
In such a case the objection should be effective only between the objecting State and the State which made the partial withdrawal of the reservation.
Article 9.5 does not unambiguously state that an amendment will not come into force for those States which made an objection.
Possibility of considering the Convention as a necessary legal basis for extradition for crimes of torture in relation to States which make extradition subject to the existence of a treaty.
It was not clear whether a State which made a reservation that was prohibited by article 19 was bound to accept a treaty without reservation, or how it would be determined that a reservation contravened article 19.
The above-mentioned notification is therefore incorrect andmisleading since it is erroneously suggesting that the State which would like to withdraw the reservation is the same person under international law as the State which made the reservation.
Expresses its gratitude to the Government of Switzerland and other host States that made it possible to convene the Regional Conference and a series of preparatory meetings,as well as those States which made voluntary contributions for this purpose;
Ratification, signature oraccession were merely an opportunity for the State which made the statement to make a unilateral commitment and, if it was bound, it was only for the reasons put forward by the International Court of Justice in the 1974 Nuclear Tests case draft guideline 1.1.5.
Another venue for an entire session, or any part thereof, may be designated by the Commission in consultation with any coastal State which made a submission to be considered at that session and with the Secretary-General, subject to the requirements established by the United Nations that no additional costs are directly or indirectly incurred by the United Nations.
Another venue for a meeting may be designated by the Commission in consultation with any coastal State which made a submission to be considered at the meeting and the Secretary-General, subject to the requirements established by the United Nations that no additional costs are directly or indirectly incurred by the United Nations.
During its nineteenth session,one member of the Commission pointed out that the rules of procedure allowed for venues other than United Nations Headquarters in New York to be designated by the Commission in consultation with any coastal State which made a submission, and suggested that part of the examination of certain submissions could be carried out in that State. .
States which make a greater contribution to the maintenance of international peace and the achievement of other goals of the United Nations, and which carry heavy financial obligations, would have a better possibility of participating in the Council's work, and, thus, paragraph l of Article 23 of the United Nations Charter would be implemented more fully.
The fact remains that it is a separate instrument and that a State which made a reservation to the first treaty is bound by the second and not the first. If, for example, a third State, by acceding to the second treaty, acceded also to the first, the impact of the reservation would be fully felt in that State's relations with the reserving State. .