Примеры использования Stock hypothesis на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group recalled that a focus topic on the stock hypothesis of.
It encouraged the development of a stock hypothesis(Table 1) for Division 58.4.3a and noted that the.
It noted that the further development of a stock hypothesis for.
The Working Group noted that a stock hypothesis was not included as part of this research proposal.
The Working Group agreed that it would be valuable to develop a stock hypothesis for.
The Working Group noted that there is no stock hypothesis developed for this area and recommended some further work towards this objective.
Mawsoni and assist with evaluating the current stock hypothesis for the region.
It noted that WG-SAM had concluded that a stock hypothesis(as developed for the Ross Sea region) was needed to further develop its work in Subarea 48.6 and the wider region.
These recaptures will contribute tothe stock assessment and to further develop the stock hypothesis for the area.
The Working Group noted that the lack of a robust stock hypothesis was impacting on the ability to develop an integrated stock assessment for Subarea 48.6.
These surveys had caught small toothfish, andincorporating that information would help inform the development of a stock hypothesis.
Such an approach might also be developed through a process comparable to the stock hypothesis developed for toothfish WG-SAM-18/33 Rev. 1.
Proposals will generate local abundance indices but are very geographically constrained andthere is no plan to widen the research into a broader stock hypothesis.
The Working Group thanked the proponents for presenting their stock hypothesis for this region, and suggested it be brought to the workshop next year paragraph 8.22.
The Working Group noted that the research proposal from Chile is likely to generate local abundance indices butis geographically constrained with no plan to widen the research into a broader stock hypothesis.
Mr Maschette informed the Working Group that in addition to progressing the stock hypothesis through modelling, genetic investigations are planned to inform delineation of.
Mawsoni catch limit for 2017/18 and that multi-Member research proposals should be reviewed in 2018 to account for areasof high by-catch and incorporate the habitat model and stock hypothesis developed by WG-FSA-17/16.
It noted that without data to test the stock hypothesis it was not clear how the transition from estimation of biomass within research blocks to an integrated assessment for the whole subarea would be achieved.
Mawsoni in Subarea 48.4 be set at 37 tonnes for 2019/20 based on the results of this assessment, and that a stock hypothesis be continued to be developed for that area.
In order to expedite the process of testing the stock hypothesis and increasing the likelihood of obtaining sufficient tags necessary for the development of an integrated stock assessment, the Working Group recommended that.
The Working Group noted that the proposal is likely to generate local abundance indices, butis geographically constrained, and that there is no description of a plan to widen the research into a broader stock hypothesis.
The Working Group noted the analogous situation to the development of the fishery in the Ross Sea,where the stock hypothesis informed the research designed in the area, and recommended the development of specific research questions around the stock hypothesis that could be addressed in research proposals in the future.
It noted that there had been considerable success in progressing the work of the Scientific Committee at focused workshops previously, and noted the success of last year's SISO meeting andat the Berlin Workshop to develop a stock hypothesis for toothfish in Area 48.
The deliberations resulted in formulation of three alternative, nested stock hypotheses for.
It reiterated the need to develop stock hypotheses in this area.
The Working Group noted that there are three stock hypotheses developed by WS-DmPH-18 which should be incorporated into this research plan.
The Working Group noted that given the stock hypotheses in Area 48, this assumption was unrealistic.
The Working Group noted that in areas where information was missing to develop stock hypotheses, such as hydrological models, then collating that information and developing hypotheses should be a first priority and the resulting stock hypotheses should be used to direct research activity.
With respect to the stock structure, the Scientific Committee noted the conclusions from WG-SAM(Annex 5, paragraph 2.8) which recommended that the existing management approach be continued andthat additional research would be useful to further test or develop stock hypotheses.
The Working Group looked forward to the development of stock hypotheses being presented to CCAMLR.