Примеры использования Strategic doctrines на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Strategic doctrines and nuclear deterrence.
The Rio Group stresses the need to eliminate the role of nuclear weapons in strategic doctrines and security policies.
Strategic doctrines and nuclear deterrence: problems.
Little has been done since 2000 by the 5 NWS to reduce the importance of nuclear weapons at their defence and strategic doctrines.
Such strategic doctrines lent greater importance to the issue of security assurances.
Люди также переводят
However, for most States missiles are such a central part of operational and strategic doctrines that controls across the board simply cannot be envisaged.
Yet strategic doctrines have yet to be renounced, even in the post-cold-war era.
In these circumstance, reports that new nuclear weapon systems are being developed and strategic doctrines that lower the threshold for the use of those weapons are being considered are disturbing.
Reiterating strategic doctrines, developing and acquiring nuclear weapons and maintaining a permanent rationale are incompatible with those commitments.
In response, India notes with regret that other nuclear-weapon States have also reaffirmed the continuing centrality of nuclear weapons in their strategic doctrines.
Some of the current strategic doctrines raise the possibility of their use against non-nuclear States, even in conventional scenarios.
Urges the nuclear-weapon States to examine further interim measures, including measures to enhance strategic stability andaccordingly to review strategic doctrines;
It is, therefore, surprising that the strategic doctrines, those concerning nuclear weapons and the declared readiness to use them remain basically unchanged.
We consider unacceptable the developing, producing and stockpiling of nuclear weapons and other weapons of mass destruction,as well as strategic doctrines based on the use or threat of use of such weapons.
Reducing the number of warheads and renouncing strategic doctrines based on the utility of nuclear weapons are other mutually reinforcing paths.
New strategic doctrines are being proposed or embarked upon that will not improve the quality of human life, but will instead spark a new arms race whose only objective is the development or acquisition of new generations of weapons.
Furthermore, a diminishing role for nuclear weapons cannot be realistically contemplated as long as strategic doctrines remain unchanged and nuclear weapons continue to underpin the security of military alliances.
All strategic doctrines experimented with so far, from the balance of power to mutually assured destruction, have failed to offer such peace.
While stressing the need to eliminate the role of nuclear weapons in strategic doctrines and security policies, we call upon all nuclear-weapon States to review such doctrines and policies.
It would be incongruous and counter-productive for anyone to insist on an unconditional and indefinite extension of the NPT, on the one hand, and to sidestep the issue of security assurances,citing outdated strategic doctrines, on the other.
For a renunciation of strategic doctrines based upon the use of nuclear weapons and… for the adoption of an action plan for the elimination of all nuclear weapons, within a time-bound framework”.
Most important, efforts to achieve nuclear disarmament continue to be undermined by the persistence of narrowly conceived strategic doctrines and by unilateral coercive measures in pursuit of national security interests.
Seventh, diminishing the role of nuclear weapons in strategic doctrines and security policies to minimize the risk that these weapons will ever be used and to facilitate the process of their total elimination.
In operative paragraph 6, the words“including the exploration by them of an undertaking not to be the first to use nuclear weapons” were replaced by the words“including measures to enhance strategic stability andaccordingly to review strategic doctrines”;
Until that is achieved,the focus on nuclear weapons in their strategic doctrines must be ended and tangible progress made in the establishment of security safeguards against the use of such weapons.
Sophisticated strategic doctrines that purportedly justified the possession of nuclear weapons had a more basic meaning: to enhance a sense of power and dominance for those who possessed them. The principle of undiminished security for all was not for all if it was based on nuclear weapons.
Among the more serious challenges to multilateral disarmament efforts are updated strategic doctrines that set out rationales for the retention, development, deployment and even possible use of nuclear weapons.
New strategic doctrines for pre-emptive strikes and the first use of nuclear weapons, unilateralism, lack of political will and lack of vision to promote common security for all States have negative effects and erode multilateralism in the field of arms control and disarmament.
There is also a genuine andurgent need to eliminate the role of nuclear weapons in strategic doctrines and security policies to minimize the risk that these weapons will ever be used and to facilitate the process of their elimination.
We are hopeful that the dialogue between the United States of America andthe Russian Federation will move the two nations to renounce strategic doctrines based on the use of nuclear weapons and to eliminate weapons of mass destruction, thereby guaranteeing a climate of trust and world security.