Примеры использования Subcommittee delegation на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Subcommittee delegations draw conclusions on the basis of its cross-checked findings made during visits.
The hospital staff, who cooperated fully with the Subcommittee delegation, acknowledged the inadequacy of the infrastructure and the services provided.
The Subcommittee delegation interviewed detainees who had not been given the opportunity to inform their families of their detention.
In addition, the Subcommittee has been made aware that some persons deprived of their liberty may have been warned in advance not to say anything to the Subcommittee delegation.
Further, I have been part of several Subcommittee delegations during visits to places where people are deprived of liberty.
The Chairperson, speaking as a member of the delegation, said that the delegation noted with concern that the national preventive mechanism,which had been established in January 2012, had not undertaken a single visit to a place of detention prior to the arrival of the Subcommittee delegation- nor had it undertaken any since.
The Subcommittee delegations have carried out unannounced visits to places of deprivation of liberty and have had interviews in private with persons deprived of their liberty.
The staff of the facility did their utmost to cooperate with the Subcommittee delegation and were willing to provide any information that might be relevant to the purposes of the visit.
The Subcommittee delegation had the opportunity to visit two psychiatric care facilities in Oaxaca in order to assess the physical conditions in these centres.
One such person, a former federal investigations agent who at the time of the visit had been in detention for 12 days,told the Subcommittee delegation that he had never been informed of the reasons for his arrest, never shown a warrant, never given the assistance of a lawyer and never allowed to make any telephone calls.
The Subcommittee delegation examined both elements and situations that might provide safeguards for people deprived of their liberty or that might exacerbate the risk of torture and ill-treatment.
Lastly, regarding implementation,some States parties already held highly valuable follow-up round tables with members of the Subcommittee delegation after each visit in order to discuss challenges encountered in implementing the Subcommittee's recommendations and how it could be of assistance.
The final draft of the Subcommittee delegation's visit report shall be agreed by the delegation through a process of consultation, before circulation to the Subcommittee for consideration.
Subsequently, the Subcommittee met with representatives of individual States parties at their request shortly before the commencement of a visit, in order to inform them about the programme of forthcoming visits and to discuss various issues arising in relation to the conduct of Subcommittee visits, including the facilitation of visits by authorities, the powers of access of the Subcommittee, the approach of Subcommittee delegations, initial feedback and reporting on the visit and ongoing dialogue.
Another prison in which the Subcommittee delegation observed the negative consequences of overcrowding was Molino Flores also known as"Molinito.
In the course of the visits during the reporting period, Subcommittee delegations met with representatives of the bodies designated to act as NPMs in some of the countries visited.
The Subcommittee delegation heard from all the parties involved that the process of establishing the national preventive mechanism in Mexico was not an easy one and that it generated some misunderstandings among the various stakeholders taking part in the discussion of its creation.
By monitoring what happened in practice after visits by Subcommittee delegations, those mechanisms ensured that the work to prevent torture continued and that it was anchored in the national context.
The Subcommittee delegation consisted of the following members: Mr. Mario Luis Coriolano(head of delegation), Mr. Hans Draminsky Petersen, Mr. Miguel Sarre Iguínez and Mr. Wilder Tayler Souto.
Persons deprived of their liberty with whom the Subcommittee delegation has spoken may be threatened if they do not reveal the content of these interviews, or punished for having spoken with the delegation. .
The Subcommittee delegation heard from various sources that the widespread impunity enjoyed by perpetrators of abuse is a major factor in the continued use of torture and other ill-treatment.
Persons deprived of their liberty with whom the Subcommittee delegation has spoken may be threatened if they do not reveal the content of these interviews, or punished for having spoken with the delegation. .
The Subcommittee delegation was assisted by Patrice Gillibert, Sandra del Pino and Christel Mobech, staff members of the Subcommittee secretariat; two freelance interpreters; and one security official from the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.
This report is part of the dialogue between the Subcommittee delegation and the Mexican authorities aimed at preventing torture and other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment.
During visits, Subcommittee delegations have engaged in empirical fact-finding and discussions with a wide range of interlocutors, including officials of the ministries concerned with deprivation of liberty and with other government institutions, other State authorities such as judicial or prosecutorial authorities, relevant national human rights institutions, professional bodies and representatives of civil society.
In the course of their visits during the reporting period, Subcommittee delegations met with representatives of the bodies designated to act as national preventive mechanisms in some of the countries visited.
During visits, Subcommittee delegations have engaged in empirical fact-finding and discussions with a wide range of interlocutors, including officials of the ministries concerned with deprivation of liberty and with other government institutions, other State authorities such as judicial or prosecutorial authorities, relevant national human rights institutions, professional bodies and representatives of civil society.
Despite the progress made in this area, the Subcommittee delegation noted that in the states where the Istanbul Protocol is being implemented the objectives for which it was established are not being met.
Mr. Obrecht said that,shortly before the visit of the Subcommittee delegation, the Association for the Prevention of Torture(APT) and Amnesty International had held a training seminar in Senegal and that APT intended to return to the country in March 2013 to continue the training.
During its three visits during the reporting period, the Subcommittee delegation met with the representatives of the national human rights commissions of Mauritius and the Maldives who had been given tasks with regard to the development of national preventive mechanisms.