Примеры использования To chapter v of the report на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Turning to chapter V of the report, he drew attention to the definition of the term“indigenous cultural communities”.
With regard to the funding arrangements for the associated costs related to the capital master plan, the Committee's attention was drawn to chapter V of the report(A/63/582) on actions to be taken by the General Assembly.
He also drew attention to chapter V of the report of that Committee, as well as its relevant working papers A/AC.109/2002/3, 4, 7-9, 12, 14, 15 and 17.
At the 2nd meeting, on 1 October, the Rapporteur of the Special Committee on the Situation with regard to the Implementation of the Declaration on the Granting of Independence to Colonial Countries and Peoples made a statement in which he gave an account of the relevant activities of the Special Committee during 1996 anddrew attention to chapter V of the report of that Committee relating to item 89,1 as well as the relevant working papers of the Committee A/AC.109/2041 and Corr.1, 2045, 2052, 2053 and 2054 and Add.1.
Turning to chapter V of the report, she stressed the fundamental importance which she attached to work on the topic, which was long overdue.
Люди также переводят
Ms. Telalian(Greece), referring to chapter V of the report, said that the four new draft articles on responsibility of international organizations appeared to be adequately formulated.
Turning to chapter V of the report on effects of armed conflicts on treaties, he said that the 18 draft articles adopted by the Commission on first reading offered a useful basis for further work.
Ms. Rivero(Uruguay), referring to chapter V of the report, said that her delegation shared the view of the Special Rapporteur that the Commission should not overly extend the scope of the topic.
Turning to chapter V of the report on shared natural resources, he recalled that in 2006 the Commission had adopted 19 draft articles on the law of transboundary aquifers, together with commentaries thereto.
Mr. Pitta e Cunha(Portugal), referring to chapter V of the report, concurred with the Special Rapporteur that the international protection of human rights was an issue distinct from diplomatic protection.
With regard to chapter V of the report, he said that the core of the issue of diplomatic protection was the nationality principle, in other words, the link between a State and its nationals abroad.
Mr. Gómez-Roblado(Mexico), referring to chapter V of the report, said that the study of the topic should be limited to diplomatic protection of natural persons, nationality of claims and exhaustion of local remedies.
As to chapter V of the report, his delegation attached great importance to further work on monitoring the implementation of the 1958 New York Convention, and his country had replied to the questionnaire on the subject.
Mr. Hmoud(Jordan), referring to chapter V of the report, said that the Commission's work was valuable since there was little jurisprudence offering guidance on the issue of the responsibility of international organizations.
Mr. Pastor Ridruejo(Spain),referring to chapter V of the report under consideration, on reservations to treaties, said he would address the question of the form which the results of the study of the International Law Commission should take.
Turning to chapter V of the report, he said his delegation shared the Commission's general view that the Vienna Conventions on the law of treaties had established a practical reservations regime applicable to all types of treaties.
Mr. Wood(United Kingdom),referring to chapter V of the report, welcomed the fact that the Commission had limited its work on the topic to issues relating to nationality of claims and the exhaustion of local remedies.
Mr. Kolodkin(Russian Federation),referring to chapter V of the report, said that the topic was all the more relevant since for his Government, in accordance with the Constitution, the protection of its citizens abroad was an obligation, not a right.
Mr. Zarif(Islamic Republic of Iran),referring to chapter V of the report of the International Law on Commission(A/53/10 and Corr.1), said that the topic of diplomatic protection had major practical significance for contemporary international relations.
Referring to chapter V of the report, which dealt with the law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses, he said that, at its latest session,the Commission had begun the second reading of the draft articles adopted on first reading in 1991.
Turning to chapter V of the report, he said that the Special Rapporteur had correctly identified one of the major issues relating to the topic, namely, whether the rights involved in diplomatic protection belonged to the State or to the individual.
Ms. WONG(New Zealand),referring to chapter V of the report of the International Law Commission(A/51/10), said that the draft articles on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law deserved close consideration.
Turning to chapter V of the report, specifically, the Preliminary Conclusions of the Commission contained in paragraph 157, he reaffirmed the integrity of the existing system for reservations to treaties set out in the 1969 Vienna Convention.
With regard to chapter V of the report(Diplomatic protection), his delegation supported the suggestion that the working group should focus on the issues raised in chapter one of the outline proposed in the previous year, entitled“Basis for diplomatic protection”.
Ms. Hajjaji(Tunisia), referring to chapter V of the report dealing with chapters III, IV and V of Part Two of the draft articles on State responsibility, said that the applicable law and the provisions fell essentially under international customary law.
Turning to chapter V of the report, on international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, he said that the parameters of that complex topic went far beyond the traditional notions of domestic jurisdiction and territorial sovereignty.
Mr. Henczel(Poland), referring to chapter V of the report of the International Law Commission(A/59/10), said he would deal with the issues that the Special Rapporteur on responsibility of international organizations intended to address in his third report, due in 2005.
Mr. Ortúzar(Chile), referring to chapter V of the report, said that continuous nationality reflected the necessary effective link between a person and the State that provided protection, which must exist both at the time of the injury and at the time of presentation of the claim.
Turning to chapter V of the report, dealing with international liability for injurious consequences arising out of acts not prohibited by international law, his delegation was pleased to note that the special situation of developing countries had been covered in a general provision applying to all the draft articles on the matter.
With regard to chapter V of the report the functional protection by international organizations of their officials and the right of the State of nationality of a ship or aircraft to bring a claim on behalf of the crew and passengers, irrespective of their nationality, went beyond the scope of diplomatic protection.