Примеры использования To constituent instruments на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Reservations to constituent instruments of.
The considerations applicable to permanent regimes, discussed in paragraphs(8) to(14),accordingly also apply generally to constituent instruments of international organizations.
Reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations.
The second paragraph concerned the particular case of reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations.
As the Special Rapporteur already indicated in his first report,"article 20, paragraph 3, is far from resolving all the problems which can anddo arise" with regard to the legal regime applicable to reservations to constituent instruments.
The particular case of reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations.
Article 23 of the 1969 and 1986 Vienna Conventions does not deal with the particular case of the procedure with regard to reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations.
However, certain draft guidelines regarding reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations, in particular draft guideline 2.8.11, required further consideration.
Draft guideline 2.1.5, on the communication of reservations,supplemented article 23 of the Vienna Convention by referring to reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations.
However, it felt that this same rule applies to reservations to constituent instruments stricto sensu and to reservations to treaties creating oversight bodies that assist in the application of the treaty whose status as international organizations might be subject to challenge.
The second paragraph of guideline 2.1.5 concerns the particular case of reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations.
It would seem justifiable in fact to apply this same rule to reservations to constituent instruments stricto sensu and to reservations to treaties creating oversight bodies that assist in the application of the treaty whose status as international organizations might be subject to challenge.
The third-- and final-- exception to the flexible regime set out in article 20, paragraph 4, of the Vienna Conventions is provided for by paragraph 3 of that article and relates to constituent instruments of international organizations.
It would therefore seem useful to reiterate in a separate guideline that the presumption of acceptance does not apply to constituent instruments of international organizations, at least with regard to acceptance expressed by the competent organ of the organization.
It can also happen that the prohibited reservation relates to less central provisions but is nonetheless contrary to the object and purpose of the treaty because it makes its implementation impossible.That is the rationale behind the wariness the Vienna Convention displays towards reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations.
Xii What rules, other than the very general indications given in article 20, paragraph 3,are applicable to reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations? See, in this connection, the more specific questions raised in para. 137.
It can also happen that the prohibited reservation relates to less central provisions but is nonetheless contrary to the object and purpose of the treaty because it makes its implementation impossible.That is the rationale behind the wariness the Vienna Convention displays towards reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations.
This question is covered by article 5 of the Vienna Conventions, which deals with the application of the provisions of the Conventions to constituent instruments of international organizations"without prejudice to any relevant rules of the organization.
It is assumed that the tacit(or implicit) acceptance results from silence on the part of contracting States or international organizations during a specific period or at a time when they should have objected; thus, no procedural difficulty is likely to arise, contrary to what occurs when the acceptance is express(sect. 2),including in the particular case of reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations sect. 3.
This question is covered by the"without prejudice"clause in article 5, according to which the provisions of the Conventions apply to constituent instruments of international organizations"without prejudice to any relevant rules of the organization.
By contrast, no matter how problematic and arguable the provision may be, it is certainly necessary to reproduce in the Guide to Practice the rule set forth in article 23, paragraph 1, of the 1969 and 1986 Vienna Conventions(taking the latter in its broadest formulation), presumably adding that such communication must be made in writing and setting forth this general rule in a single draft guideline,together with a special rule on the communication of reservations to constituent instruments of international organizations.
Moreover, as guidelines 2.8.8 and 2.8.9 show, article 20, paragraph 3,is far from resolving all the problems that can arise with regard to the legal regime applicable to reservations to constituent instruments: not only does it not define either the notion of a constituent instrument or the competent organ which must decide, but it also fails to say anything about the modalities of the organ's acceptance of reservations.
Reservations to treaties other than constituent instruments of International organizations.
That provision in effect makes the 1969 Vienna Convention applicable to the constituent instruments of international organizations"without prejudice to any relevant rules of the organization", including provisions concerning the admission of new members or.
It is a different matter, however,for acceptances of reservations to the constituent instruments of international organizations referred to in paragraph 3 of the same article on the one hand and express acceptances on the other.
Observations 2001: revision 2011 This draft guideline is based on article 23 of the Vienna Convention andis a valuable addition thereto since it also refers to reservations made to the constituent instruments of international organizations.
For this reason, he believes that draft guideline 2.4.2 could be supplemented by a paragraph based on the text of draft guideline 2.1.5 andcould also include the special rule governing the communication of reservations to the constituent instruments of international organizations, proposed above to supplement draft guideline 2.1.5.
Although no provision is made for this in their statutes, these bodies have undertaken to determine the permissibility of reservations to their constituent instruments. Their competence to do so must be recognized: it is a prerequisite for the exercise of the general monitoring functions with which they are invested;
Limiting the right of international organizations to formulate reservations to the area of their competence as such or to reservations compatible with their constituent instruments;
Moreover, the reference to the"internal law" would be problematic whenapplied to international organizations, since at least their constituent instruments generally pertain to international law.