Примеры использования To external assistance на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Consent of the affected State to external assistance 123.
Moreover, the imposition of such an obligation was inconsistent with the right of the affected State not to consent to external assistance.
Draft article 11(Consent of the affected State to external assistance) was consistent both with draft article 9 and with general international law.
Draft article 11 addressed consent of an affected State to external assistance.
With regard to paragraph 2 of draft article 11(Consent of the affected State to external assistance), it was necessary to identify specific criteria for the determination of arbitrary denial.
Duty of the affected State not to arbitrarily withhold its consent to external assistance.
With respect to draft article 11(Consent of the affected State to external assistance), the notion of the arbitrary withholding of consent mentioned in paragraph 2 was open to arbitrary interpretations.
She welcomed the codification, in draft article 11,of the fundamental principle that the affected State must give its consent to external assistance.
The draft articles also made it compulsory for a State to have recourse to external assistance should its national response capacity be exceeded.
Draft articles 9(Role of the affected State), 10(Duty of the affected State to seek assistance) and11 Consent of the affected State to external assistance.
For its part, draft article 14[11]requires the consent of the affected State to external assistance, with the caveat that consent shall not be withheld arbitrarily.
Paragraph 2 stipulates that consent to external assistance shall not be withheld arbitrarily, while paragraph 3 places a duty upon an affected State to make known its decision regarding an offer of assistance whenever possible.
Development of improved approaches to external assistance.
Paragraph 2 stipulated that consent to external assistance should not be withheld arbitrarily, while paragraph 3 placed a duty upon an affected State to make its decision regarding an offer of assistance known whenever possible.
She also queried the exact scope of the provision in paragraph 2 that"consent to external assistance shall not be withheld arbitrarily.
First, the Commission considers that withholding consent to external assistance is not arbitrary where a State is capable of providing, and willing to provide, an adequate and effective response to a disaster on the basis of its own resources.
Nonetheless, the requirement was tempered by draft article 11, paragraph 2,which stated that consent to external assistance should not be withheld arbitrarily.
Foreign direct investment was often prescribed as an alternative to external assistance, ignoring the fact that a certain level of institutional and infrastructural development was a prerequisite for attracting foreign capital inflow.
For these members of the Commission, draft article 11, paragraph 2, should not be draftedto include the mandatory"shall"; rather, the provision should indicate that"Consent to external assistance should not be withheld arbitrarily.
The duty not to impede access is relevant to external assistance accepted by the State, local authorities and humanitarian assistance provided by the State itself for example, where there are disagreements between State humanitarian and security agencies.
Myanmar was making progress in developing its economyprimarily using its own resources, as its right to external assistance was being consistently denied by international financial institutions.
At the sixty-third session(2011), the Commission provisionally adopted draft articles 6(Humanitarian principles in disaster response), 7(Human dignity), 8(Human rights), 9(Role of the affected State), 10(Duty of the affected State to seek assistance) and11 Consent of the affected State to external assistance.
However, it was not clear how the statement in paragraph 2 that consent to external assistance must not be withheld arbitrarily would translate into practice.
As to draft articles 10 and 11, rather than imposing a strictly legal obligation with respect to assistance that would entail international legal consequences in the event of non-compliance, their purpose should be to determine that the affected State had simply a moral and political duty to seek assistance andnot to withhold arbitrarily its consent to external assistance.
Draft article 11 established the principle that the affected State should not withhold consent to external assistance arbitrarily; a similar principle should apply to the termination of assistance. .
Paragraph 2 of draft article 11(Consent of the affected State to external assistance) should also be more closely harmonized with the resolutions of the Institute of International Law mentioned in the commentary to the draft article by amending it to read:"Consent to external assistance offered in good faith and exclusively intended to provide humanitarian assistance shall not be withheld arbitrarily and unjustifiably.
It was also necessary to clarify what might constitute"arbitrary" withholding of consent within the meaning of draft article 11(Consent of the affected State to external assistance) and what criteria might be used to establish an affected State's inability or unwillingness to consent to external assistance.
The State did not have unlimited discretion regarding its consent to external assistance, which it was obliged to seek if the disaster exceeded its response capacity and which, if it lacked the capacity or the will to do so, should nonetheless be guaranteed.
The Commission had also made progress on the topic of the protection of persons in the event of disasters, particularly with regard to the duty of the affected State to seek assistance(draft article 10) andnot to arbitrarily withhold its consent to external assistance(draft article 11) and the right to offer assistance draft article 12.
In the context of the fight against poverty to which all actors in the international community have subscribed as well as in relation to external assistance, it is therefore not surprising that the African"Heads of State and Government called for a new partnership with donors based on improved aid coordination, harmonized donor procedures, and firm, longer-term commitments.