Примеры использования To freedom from hunger на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
As stated in paragraph 164 of the previous report,the Government recognizes the right to freedom from hunger.
The right to food and the right to freedom from hunger are human rights protected under international human rights and humanitarian law.
Everyone has a right to adequate, safe, sufficient andnutritious food, and to freedom from hunger.
The right to food and the right to freedom from hunger are human rights protected under international human rights and humanitarian law.
Similarly, the people's right to work, to food, clothing and housing, to health and education andeven the right to freedom from hunger are jeopardized by LTTE's disruptive activities.
It is unacceptable that the right to freedom from hunger and the right to adequate food should be considered as simply"aspirations" rather than real human rights that Governments are obliged to respect and to enforce.
As a specific drafting modification,the suggestion was made to replace the last part of the paragraph after the words"the right to freedom from hunger", with the phrase"the right to effective public health and medical services to all.
It provides for the right to an adequate standard of living that encompasses adequate food, clothing and housing, and to the"continuous improvement of living conditions" and requires that immediate andurgent measures to ensure the fundamental right to freedom from hunger and malnutrition.
His Government had consistently maintained that the right to adequate food or to freedom from hunger was a goal to be attained progressively and did not give rise to any international obligations or diminish the responsibilities of national governments to their citizens.
First, the international organizations could help States which lacked resources andwere unable to guarantee the right to adequate food and the right to freedom from hunger for all its citizens, whether temporarily, periodically or for a longer term.
Firstly, through customary law under which there are direct obligations to human rights standards and secondly through the responsibility of international cooperation that is enshrined in article 2(1) of the International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights,as well as in article 11 on the right to freedom from hunger.
Deeply disturbed by the negative impact of unilateral coercive measures on the right to life, the rights to health and medical care,the right to freedom from hunger and the right to an adequate standard of living, food, education, work and housing.
Ugandan and Rwandan troops are also engaging in massive human rights violations in the areas of conflict, including violations of the freedom and security of the Congolese people, torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment, failure to respect the right of peoples to self-determination and to full control of their assets and national resources andviolation of the right to health and the right to freedom from hunger.
Decisions on sanctions must not create situations in which fundamental human rights not subject to suspension even in an emergency situation would be violated, above all the right to life,the right to freedom from hunger, the right to prevent and cure epidemic and other diseases and combat them, and the right to create conditions which would ensure medical services for all and care in the event of illness.
In the field of human rights law, the rights most relevant to assessing the legality of economic measures seem to be the right to life, the right to an adequate standard of living, including food, clothing, housing and medical care,the right to freedom from hunger, and the right to health.
Decisions on sanctions must not create situations in which fundamental human rights not subject to suspension even in an emergency situation would be violated, above all the right to life,the right to freedom from hunger and the right to effective health care and medical services for all.
The Committee observes that while the problems of hunger and malnutrition are often particularly acute in developing countries, malnutrition, under-nutrition andother problems which relate to the right to adequate food and the right to freedom from hunger, also exist in some of the most economically developed countries.
The Third Committee's debate in 1957 was effectively the final discussion of the cultural rights provision, although the General Assembly revisited the ICESCR twice in following years(in 1962 to discuss articles 2-5 andin 1963 to introduce the explicit right to freedom from hunger), before formally adopting the full convention in 1966.
Chapter V discusses the steps to be taken by States in order to ensure freedom from hunger and to implement the right to food.
Several positive examples exist of States where efforts are now being made to elaborate a human rights-based strategy to ensure freedom from hunger and the enjoyment of the right to food.
It can be seen as a first step towards the development of a national strategy to ensure freedom from hunger and the right to food.
Is based on the conviction that the widespread failure by States andthe international community to ensure freedom from hunger and enjoyment by all of the right to food constitutes one of the most serious shortcomings of the human rights agenda.
Explicit protection of the right to adequate food or freedom from hunger.
Promotion of the right to food and freedom from hunger can be achieved through the monitoring of the food supply situation, according to FAO's reply.
The rights to food, freedom from hunger and to life in the context of the Democratic People's Republic of Korea cannot be reduced to a narrow discussion of food shortages and access to a commodity.
Over the last few years,there has been an important increase in the number of States that have adopted provisions containing explicit recognition of the right to food or freedom from hunger.
The commission is concerned that structural issues, including laws andpolicies that violate the right to adequate food and freedom from hunger, remain in place, which could lead to the recurrence of mass starvation.
They offer practical guidance to States about how best to implement their obligation under international law to respect the right to adequate food and to ensure freedom from hunger.
However, the Special Rapporteur would point out that the human right to adequate food simply tries to guarantee freedom from hunger and access to food for every human being at all times.
The Special Rapporteur continues to be gravely concerned at the situation in the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, which amount to violations of the obligations to respect, protect andfulfil the right to food and freedom from hunger.