Примеры использования To protect vmes на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The United States noted that its efforts to protect VMEs within its EEZ were ongoing.
In 2006, NEAFC amended its Convention andthe London Declaration to create the formal basis for taking action to close areas to protect VMEs.
France noted that it had taken steps to protect VMEs even before the adoption of General Assembly resolution 61/105.
States also reported on measures taken in areas under their national jurisdiction in order to ensure,inter alia, consistency with measures to protect VMEs adopted by RFMO/As for high-seas areas under their competence.
New measures to protect VMEs were also adopted at the NAFO Fisheries Commission Intersessional Meeting on Vulnerable Marine Ecosystems, held from 5 to 7 May 2008.
New Zealand has undertaken two major initiatives within its EEZ to protect VMEs and other benthic habitats.
States have attached great importance to the protection of marine ecosystems and they have made active efforts to implement the measures recommended by the General Assembly to RFMO/As, as contained in paragraph 83 of resolution 61/105,in application of the precautionary approach to protect VMEs.
Area-based management tools have been employed by States to protect VMEs from destructive fishing practices and to sustainably manage fish stocks Canada, New Zealand, Peru, United States.
Those States participating in negotiations for the establishment of new international fishing agreements have adopted interim measures andestablished scientific procedures to protect VMEs and ensure the long-term sustainability of deep-sea fish stocks.
Norway implemented the conservation and management measures established by NEAFC and NAFO to protect VMEs, through its regulations of 9 February 2009 on bottom fishing activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction in the north-east Atlantic Ocean and the north-west Atlantic Ocean.
Several States(Australia, Canada, Croatia, Mexico, Norway, United States) and the European Union also reported on progress in the application of precautionary andecosystems approaches to protect VMEs from bottom fishing and destructive fishing practices.
The United States had taken significant actions,principally through its regional fisheries management councils, to protect VMEs from destructive fishing practices, including by designating essential fish habitats, habitat areas of particular concern, national marine sanctuaries, and no-take reserves.
It noted that the current science surrounding temperate area closures was uncertain, and it had thus moved forward in a precautionary andadaptive manner to close areas to bottom fisheries in order to protect VMEs, and to formalize procedures for area management.
If fully implemented, resolutions 61/105 and 64/72, as well as the FAO Guidelines,provide the tools necessary to protect VMEs from significant adverse impacts due to bottom fishing and to ensure the long-term sustainability of deep sea fish stocks.
In 2007, NEAFC closed five areas in the Rockall-Hatton Bank area to bottom fishingto protect deep-water corals, and, in April 2009, five areas on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge in the North-East Atlantic high seas to bottom fisheries in order to protect VMEs from significant adverse impacts, on the advice of ICES.
A number of States reported on the use of area-based management tools within areas of national jurisdiction to protect VMEs and marine biodiversity more generally, by limiting or restricting fishing activities, including through the establishment of marine parks, marine conservation areas, MPAs and no-take zones Canada, Chile, Colombia, Croatia, Mexico, Iceland, United States.
In 2008, SEAFO adopted interim comprehensive conservation and management measures relating to bottom fishing activitiesin all existing and new bottom fishing areas outside the SEAFO closed areas in order to protect VMEs from significant adverse impacts and to meet the deadline in resolution 61/105.
It planned to submit relevant information to FAO at least on an annual basis to contribute to global efforts to protect VMEs from bottom fishing activities in areas beyond national jurisdiction.
Paragraph 122 of resolution 64/72 called upon States and RFMO/As to enhance efforts to cooperate to collect and exchange scientific and technical data and information related to the implementation of the measurescalled for in resolutions 61/105 and 64/72 to manage deep-sea fisheries in areas beyond national jurisdiction and to protect VMEs from significant adverse impacts of bottom fishing by taking a number of actions, as described below.
More specifically, States reported on a variety of actions they had taken to support or implement conservation andmanagement measures in RFMO/As to which they belonged to regulate deep-sea fishing and protect VMEs.
In addition to the regional fisheries organizations with the competence to regulate bottom fisheries(i.e., Commission for the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources(CCAMLR), General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean(GFCM), Northwest Atlantic Fisheries Organization(NAFO), North East Atlantic Fisheries Commission(NEAFC), and South East Atlantic Fisheries Organization(SEAFO)), a number of other RFMO/As have taken measures to sustainably manage fish stocks and protect VMEs from destructive fishing practices.
Chile applied the conservation measures adopted by CCAMLR in 2008 to regulate bottom fisheries and protect VMEs.
Several States reported on action taken with respect to areas within their national jurisdiction to sustainably manage fish stocks and protect VMEs from destructive fishing practices.
In paragraphs 85 to 87 of the resolution, the Assembly also called upon States to take specific actions to regulate bottom fisheries and protect VMEs.
With sufficient calibration of model predictions with observational data on distribution of VME indicators at regional andlocal scales, such modelling will guide efforts to map and protect VMEs.
CCAMLR adopted measures to freeze the footprint of all bottom fishing activities to areas currently approved for bottom fishing through November 2008 in order to regulate bottom fisheries and protect VMEs in its regulatory area.
States have adopted a wide range of approaches and measures to sustainably manage fish stocks and protect VMEs from destructive fishing practices, including the use of area-based management tools, and conservation and management measures.
Several States also reported on management measures adopted in areas within national jurisdiction to conserve and manage fish stocks, and protect VMEs see also A/62/260, para. 69, and A/63/128, paras. 66 and 68.
In resolution 61/105, the General Assembly called upon States to take action immediately, individually and through RFMO/As, andconsistent with the precautionary approach and ecosystem approaches, to sustainably manage fish stocks and protect VMEs.
The present section contains information on conservation andmanagement measures adopted by RFMO/As to sustainably manage fish stocks and protect VMEs from destructive fishing practices, including measures to give effect to paragraph 83 of General Assembly resolution 61/105.