Примеры использования Tribunal received на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Tribunal received funds from the European Commission.
The Advisory Committee notes that in 2011, the Tribunal received 96 new appeals.
In 2002, the Tribunal received a gift of a painting from the Government of Belize.
For the period from 1 January 2010 to 31 October 2011, the Tribunal received $4,016,000 in voluntary cash contributions.
The Tribunal received a further contribution amounting to $100,000 from KOICA in March 2006.
During the period under review, the Tribunal received the first application instituting a case.
The Tribunal received the final study of the group of experts by a joint communication from the parties dated 8 November 2004.
For the period from 30 April 2007 to 31 May 2008, the Tribunal received $802,117 in voluntary cash contributions.
In 2010, the Tribunal received an average of 13.3 cases per month, and in 2011 this figure rose to 23.4 cases per month.
For the period from 15 June 2008 to 15 June 2009, the Tribunal received $1,339,291 in voluntary cash contributions.
In March 2006, the Tribunal received from KOICA its second contribution to the KOICA trust fund, in the amount of $100,000.
The Tribunal issued the order in the case on 22 November 2013.On 28 March 2013, the Tribunal received a request from the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission to render an advisory opinion.
In March 2006, the Tribunal received from KOICA its second contribution to the KOICA trust fund in the amount of 100,000 United States dollars.
For the period from 1 October 1999 to 30 September 2000, the Tribunal received approximately $9,964,473 in voluntary cash contributions.
In March 2006, the Tribunal received a further contribution amounting to $100,000 from KOICA, which was converted into Euro84,400.
For the period from 1 January 2002 to 31 August 2003, the Tribunal received approximately $6.2 million in voluntary cash contributions.
In 2002, the Tribunal received communications from parties on matters relating to compliance with judgments and orders with respect to the following case.
With regard to its workload and output,the Secretary-General indicates that the Tribunal received 282 new cases in 2011, reflecting an increase of 74 per cent over the previous calendar year.
In 2001, the Tribunal received communications from parties on matters relating to compliance with judgements and orders with respect to the following cases.
During the period under review, the Tribunal received communications from parties with respect to the following cases.
The Tribunal received approximately $2.2 million and pledges totalling $650,000 in voluntary contributions from States and intergovernmental and non-governmental organizations.
The President also informed the Meeting that,on 28 March 2013, the Tribunal received a request from the Subregional Fisheries Commission to render an advisory opinion on four questions.
In 2011, the Appeals Tribunal received 96 new appeals, rendered 88 judgements, issued 44 orders and disposed of 102 appeals, including four cross-appeals.
In annex VII to the reportit is indicated that, with regard to the recruitment process, the Tribunal received delegation of authority to classify posts up to the P-4 level on 1 June 1999, thus shortening the recruitment cycle by about three months.
On 13 November 1997, the Tribunal received its first application under article 292 of the Convention which was filed by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines against the Republic of Guinea.
In 2012, the Appeals Tribunal received 142 new cases and disposed of 103 cases.
On 13 November 1997, the Tribunal received its first application(the“M/V Saiga” cases) under article 292 of the Convention, which was filed by Saint Vincent and the Grenadines against the Republic of Guinea.
In 2013, the Appeals Tribunal received 125 new cases and disposed of 137 cases.
During the period under review, the Tribunal received visitors, in particular, holders of political offices, diplomats, members of judicial authorities and senior officials, researchers, academics, lawyers and members of the legal profession.
Shortly thereafter, the Tribunal received and commenced deliberations on its first case.