Примеры использования Weapons should на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
Weapons should be packed in a separate bag.
A world without nuclear weapons should become a reality by 2020.
Libya proposes that a comprehensive convention on nuclear weapons should.
These weapons should be destroyed, not merely stored.
In case we do not succeed with NATO,nuclear weapons should become a priority for us.
II Which Weapons Should Be Reviewed, and How Often?
Recipients and suppliers of nuclear,chemical and biological weapons should bear equal responsibility for their proliferation.
Nuclear weapons should have been outlawed once and for all.
Spain also considers that non-strategic nuclear weapons should be reduced transparently and irreversibly.
Nuclear weapons should be outlawed by the international community.
The States not party to the Non-Proliferation Treaty that possess nuclear weapons should separately provide such assurances.
Both types of weapons should be under strict international control.
It sympathized with the generic approach for political reasons, butdefining prohibited weapons should be left to Governments.
So you think chemical weapons should be part of our arsenal?
Weapons should be brought back to their designated storage sites, and the SMM must have full, unfettered access to these sites for verification purposes.
Other States possessing nuclear weapons should join the process, individually or in coordinated action.
Option 3 took a different approach, since it did not give a list of weapons butsimply stated that certain weapons should be considered prohibited.
The use of nuclear weapons should be recognized as a war crime in the Statute.
While the operative language in the draft resolution on" Reduction of non-strategic nuclear weapons" is substantially the same as that in the draft resolution entitled"Towards a nuclear-weapon-free world: the need for a new agenda", the separate draft resolution is being presented to enhance our view that the further reduction of non-strategic nuclear weapons should be accorded a higher priority as an important step towards the elimination of nuclear weapons, and be carried out in a comprehensive manner.
Remaining nuclear weapons should be gradually and transparently taken off alert.
The fundamental principle of the Act is stated as being that all weapons should be banned unless they are specifically permitted by law.
All other weapons should be declared excess and destroyed, preferably in public and as expeditiously as possible.
As first steps on a path to disarmament,all States possessing nuclear weapons should exhibit greater transparency in their actions and holdings.
Therefore, heavy weapons should immediately be withdrawn from the vicinity of Sarajevo and other areas with a high concentration of civilian population.
States that do not yet have national commissions on small arms and light weapons should establish them pursuant to their commitments under the Kinshasa Convention.
Countries that have chemical weapons should accelerate their efforts to destroy their complete storage of chemical weapons, old chemical weapons and chemical weapons abandoned in other countries.
Strategic postures andmilitary doctrines should make clear that the sole purpose of the remaining nuclear weapons should be strategic deterrence, and that under no circumstances would nuclear-armed States contemplate their first use.
We also agree that heavy weapons should be withdrawn from areas surrounding Sarajevo or put under the control of the United Nations Protection Force(UNPROFOR), for the purpose of protecting the safety and security of the people in Sarajevo and ensuring the smooth conduct of humanitarian-relief activities.
The Declaration sought to reinforce the message that all States possessing nuclear weapons should pursue steps towards the total elimination of nuclear weapons at the earliest possible time.
Illicitly transferred weapons should as far as possible be collected where they are discovered.