Примеры использования Which had no programme budget implications на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Chair drew attention to the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications.
The two draft resolutions, which had no programme budget implications, had been adopted by the Committee on Information by consensus.
She urged adoption by consensus of the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/58/L.77, which had no programme budget implications, and announced that Burkina Faso, Côte d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Indonesia, Kenya, Mauritius, Mozambique, Namibia, Suriname, Swaziland and Zimbabwe had joined the list of sponsors.
The Chair announced that Nigeria andThailand had become sponsors of the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications.
Ms. Osias-Magpile(Philippines) introducing the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications, said that the final version, incorporating all revisions and amendments, had been circulated to the Committee.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take a decision on draft resolution A/C.3/53/L.34*, which had no programme budget implications.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications, and announced that Armenia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Iraq, Mozambique and Somalia had joined the sponsors.
His delegation was sponsoring a draft resolution on the new international humanitarian order which had no programme budget implications.
His delegation hoped that the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications, would be adopted without a vote.
The CHAIRMAN announced that the Russian Federation had joined in sponsoring draft resolution A/C.3/50/L.53, which had no programme budget implications.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/58/L.72, which had no programme budget implications, and said that Cambodia, Saint Lucia and United Republic of Tanzania had joined the sponsors.
The Chairman drew attention to the proposed amendments to the draft resolution contained in documents A/C.3/62/L.78 to 81, which had no programme budget implications.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications, and announced that Benin, Botswana, Côte d'Ivoire, Haiti, Malawi, Mauritius, Qatar, Swaziland and Turkmenistan had joined the sponsors.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/53/L.58, which had no programme budget implications.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/58/L.67, which had no programme budget implications, and announced that Canada, Japan, Liechtenstein, Romania and Switzerland had joined the sponsors and that a recorded vote had been requested.
The CHAIRMAN said that Azerbaijan, Bangladesh, New Zealand, Oman andQatar had become sponsors of the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications.
The CHAIRMAN said that Australia, Guyana, Israel andParaguay should be added to the list of sponsors of the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications, and that the French text of the ninth preambular paragraph of the draft would be brought into line with the English text, at the request of Morocco.
The Chair said that he took it that the Committee wished to waive the 24-hour requirement in rule 120 of the rules of procedure in order toconsider the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications.
At the current General Assembly session Jordan would once again be introducing a draft resolution on that issue which had no programme budget implications and was based on the resolution adopted by the General Assembly at its previous session.
He took it that the Committee was prepared to waive the 24-hour rule under rule 120 of the rules of the procedure of the General Assembly andtake immediate action on the draft resolution, which had no programme budget implications.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/58/L.49, which had no programme budget implications, and announced that Albania, Bulgaria, Croatia, Estonia, Greece, Iceland, Latvia, Malta, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia and United States of America had joined the sponsors.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/53/L.8 entitled“United Nations African Institute for the Prevention of Crime andthe Treatment of Offenders”, which had no programme budget implications.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/58/L.76, which had no programme budget implications, and announced that Cambodia, Côte d'Ivoire, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Gambia, Haiti, Kenya, Mozambique, Niger, Pakistan, South Africa, Suriname and Swaziland had joined the list of sponsors.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/53/L.9 entitled“Strengthening the United Nations Crime Prevention and Criminal Justice Programme, in particular its technical cooperation capacity”, which had no programme budget implications.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/58/L.74, which had no programme budget implications, and announced that Armenia, Bangladesh, Bolivia, Brazil, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Chile, Cuba, Ecuador, Haiti, Honduras, Mali, Morocco, Mozambique, Nigeria, Sri Lanka, Sudan and Tunisia had joined the list of sponsors.
The CHAIRMAN invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/50/L.12/Rev.1, entitled"Towards full integration of persons with disabilities in society: implementation of the Standard Rules on the Equalization of Opportunities for Persons with Disabilities andof the Long-term Strategy to Implement the World Programme of Action concerning Disabled Persons to the Year 2000 and Beyond", which had no programme budget implications.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/58/L.64, which had no programme budget implications, and said that Albania, Armenia, Bolivia, Brazil, Ecuador, Estonia, Guatemala, Kenya, Malta, Panama, Paraguay, Philippines, the Republic of Moldova, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, Thailand and the former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia had joined the sponsors.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/58/L.73, which had no programme budget implications, and announced that Cambodia, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Ethiopia, Haiti, Kenya, Mauritania, Namibia, Pakistan, Russian Federation, Rwanda, Somalia, Sudan, Swaziland, Syrian Arab Republic and United Republic of Tanzania had joined the sponsors.
The Chairman invited the Committee to take action on draft resolution A/C.3/58/L.69, which had no programme budget implications, and said that Austria, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Hungary, Germany, Latvia, Liechtenstein, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Norway, Romania, Saint Kitts and Nevis, Spain, Tuvalu and the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland had joined the sponsors.