Примеры использования Working group decided to delete на Английском языке и их переводы на Русский язык
{-}
-
Official
-
Colloquial
The Working Group decided to delete this article.
Having considered the different views expressed, the Working Group decided to delete paragraph 3.
The Working Group decided to delete paragraph 1 ter.
In view of the many ongoing initiatives in this area, the working group decided to delete this item from its agenda.
The Working Group decided to delete the word"negotiation" and retain only the word"formation", removing the square brackets around it.
After discussion, the Working Group decided to delete the word.
The Working Group decided to delete the phrase“but in all other respects the provisions of this Law apply” as unnecessary.
That suggestion was not taken up, as the Working Group decided to delete draft article 53(6) in its entirety.
The Working Group decided to delete paragraph 1.2, since the requirements for vessel certificates were also contained in paragraph 1.4.
In the light of its decision as regards article 15(see para. 103 above), the Working Group decided to delete the text in the square brackets.
After discussion, the Working Group decided to delete those two references listed as points 3 and 4 on the first list contained in para. 50.
On the grounds that a single location rule would be preferable, the Working Group decided to delete variant A of subparagraph(j) ii.
After discussion, the Working Group decided to delete the second sentence of paragraph(1), retaining the reference to an express choice of law by the parties.
On the understanding that direct reference would be made indraft articles 3 and 8(2) to the time of the conclusion of the original contract, the Working Group decided to delete subparagraph b.
In view of the above, the working group decided to delete this item from the agenda.
While support was expressed for retention of subparagraph(j) as a useful tool for distinguishing the notions of"effectiveness" and"irrevocability", the Working Group decided to delete the subparagraph.
During the period under review, the Working Group decided to delete from its files the duplicate of one case.
The Working Group decided to delete the words in square brackets and to consider the issue of consumer insolvencies within the context of recognition of foreign insolvencies under article 11.
Following the consideration of practice 8 andnew proposal 1, the working group decided to delete new proposal 1 and to replace the text of practice 8 with the following text.
Following the statements made by India(on behalf of the Asian Group) andthe Czech Republic(on behalf of States members of the European Union), the working group decided to delete paragraph 141.
Having considered the various views expressed, the Working Group decided to delete subparagraphs(b),(c),(d) and(e) from paragraph 2 of article 2 of the draft convention.
Noting its earlier decision to delete the definition of"enhanced electronic signature"(see above, para. 64), the Working Group decided to delete the word"enhanced" in subparagraph e.
Having considered those views, the Working Group decided to delete the words in square brackets in the draft paragraph and elsewhere in the draft convention.
Noting also its earlier decision to delete the definition of"enhanced electronic signature"(see above, para. 64), the Working Group decided to delete the word"enhanced" in subparagraph f.
The Working Group decided to delete subparagraph(b), as it was generally felt to be self-evident that a reference to the undertaking should be understood as a reference to the latest version of the undertaking.
Recalling its decision to exclude from the scope of the draft Convention receivables otherthan contractual receivables(see para. 42), the Working Group decided to delete the bracketed text in paragraph 1.
Having considered the matter once more, the Working Group decided to delete the words within square brackets, as it was generally agreed that the uniform rules, as currently formulated, did not contain any mandatory provision.
While there was some doubt as to the correctness of that interpretation andwhether recommendation 61 actually applied to such a change in the grantor's identifier(and it did not address a change in the secured creditor's identifier), the Working Group decided to delete paragraph 5.
After discussion, the Working Group decided to delete paragraph(2) on the understanding that questions of good faith were left to law applicable outside the draft Convention as to the application of the principle of good faith under the draft Convention, see A/CN.9/WG. II/WP.105, para. 62.
In a similar vein, it was observed that simple deletion of paragraph 2 would not necessarily remove all liability on the holder pursuant to the draft convention, and that if the Working Group decided to delete the provision, the draft convention should be very carefully reviewed to ensure that there were no lingering rules placing liability on the holder.