Приклади вживання Filaret denisenko Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Filaret Denisenko.
The OCU Filaret Denisenko.
Filaret Denisenko.
Kyiv Patriarchate of Filaret Denisenko.
Filaret Denisenko.
In 1992, the former Metropolitan of Kiev Filaret Denisenko committed the sin of schism.
Filaret Denisenko has been deceiving people in various ways for 25 years now.
So, the origin and nationality of Filaret Denisenko have absolutely nothing to do with it.
Filaret Denisenko said how the Phanar, the OCU and the Ukrainian authorities are destroying the Kyiv Patriarchate.
Why the recognition by the Patriarchate of Constantinople was not enough for Filaret Denisenko and his followers to cease being schismatics.
Filaret Denisenko issued a statement in which he thanked the OCU for the opportunity to live in the complex he built.
But Patriarch Bartholomew decided that he could accept Filaret Denisenko and his followers into the Church unchanged, as they were.
The example of Filaret Denisenko in this experiment is very vivid and obvious due to the fact that he speaks openly, without fear or embarrassment because of his age, his character, and his past experience.
The fact that the OCU is an attribute of Ukrainian statehood hasbeen repeated many times by Petro Poroshenko, Filaret Denisenko, and Epiphany Dumenko, and others.
The head of the UOC KP Filaret Denisenko told the journalists of the Russian channel Russia 24 about why he had signed the Tomos and why the OCU is not an autocephalous church.
In this they even were able to one-up the Ukrainian authorities, which did not recognize the Kharkov Council in 1992 as legal andthe removal of Filaret Denisenko from the administration of the UOC.
The groups of the former schismatics who were gathered around Filaret Denisenko and Makariy Maletic are not only receiving forgiveness, but are also being“rewarded” for their behavior.
Exactly a laughing stock, because there is no other way to name the situation when a person dressed in theepiscopal robe seriously declares that in 1990 Filaret Denisenko did not become the Moscow Patriarch because of the“Ukrainian origin”.
Epiphany was"ordained" on November 15, 2009 by Filaret Denisenko, who had been excommunicated from the Church, and another seven"bishops" who were ordained by excommunicated Filaret. .
According to the official communique of the Phanar,the hierarchs of the Church of Constantinople decided to canonically reinstate Filaret Denisenko and Makariy Maletich"to their hierarchical or priestly rank.".
As the UOJ reported, on June 20, 2019, Filaret Denisenko is going to hold the“Local Council” of the UOC KP in Kiev in order to“establish” the Ukrainian Orthodox Church of the Kiev Patriarchate in the future, which will be independent both from Moscow and Constantinople”.
The“bishops” and the“clergy” of the new religiousstructure who support the“Honorary Patriarch” of the OCU Filaret Denisenko can become“schismatics” for the Constantinople Patriarchate, the“BBC.
Even before the scandalous decisions of October 11, 2018,when the Phanar recognized Filaret Denisenko and Makariy Maletich as“reunited” with the Church, and all Orthodox faiths in Ukraine“returned” to the Phanar's jurisdiction, Constantinople hierarchs began to actively throw in the information field ambiguous statements about the alleged desire of the Russian Orthodox Church to subjugate everything and everyone to itself.
There is no other way than to call the situation ridiculous when a person dressed in theepiscopal robe seriously claims that in 1990 Filaret Denisenko did not become the Moscow Patriarch just because of the“Ukrainian origin”.
Joined them to the Church without repentance and even without hearing their appeal(consideration of the appeal involves a certain process with the obligatory hearing of the opinions of the parties,in this case the Moscow Patriarchate and Filaret Denisenko, but this did not take place);
The Constantinople Patriarchate revoked the“political”anathemas imposed by the Russian Church on“Filaret Denisenko, Makariy Maletych and their followers, who found themselves in schism not for dogmatic reasons”.
The decree of the Perzident Ukraine Petro Poroshenko on assignment“anhonor to the current spiritual mentor” ptsu“Patriarch” Filaret Denisenko of the title of Hero of Ukraine is illegal, said the ex-head of the Main investigation Department of the security service and an expert on state security, the General-the major of justice Vasily Vovk in the blog on“the Censor.
Today it is already clear that the purpose of these statements was to drill the Overton window in the history of the Ukrainian schism andpresent Filaret Denisenko not as the creator of the schism, but as a patriot and an innocent victim of“despotism” of the ROC leadership.
The actions and arguments of the Patriarchate of Constantinople, who illegally removed the anathema from themain culprit of the Ukrainian church schism, Filaret Denisenko, and also recognized the hierarchy of the UAOC, which has no apostolic succession at all, indicate that Phanar does not fully understand the essence of what happened and is developing in the Orthodox environment of Ukraine.
Most“ordinations” of the episcopate of the“Orthodox Church of Ukraine” originate from the former metropolitan of Kiev andAll Ukraine Filaret Denisenko, who was banned from priesthood by the Ukrainian Orthodox Church on May 27, 1992, and disgowned by the Russian Orthodox Church on 11 June 1992.