Приклади вживання Liberal world order Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The future of the liberal world order.
Both Europe andChina are overdependent on the United States as a guarantor of the liberal world order.
So welcome to the breakdown of the liberal world order the United States once upheld.
Russia has been accused of destroying the post-war liberal world order.
The liberal world order was thus based not just on ideals embraced by democracies, but also on hard power.
It would mean the termination of the Western liberal world order.
If the edifice of the liberal world order is in danger of collapse today- and it is- when did the pillars begin to weaken?
US vice-president Joe Biden has warned thatRussia is the greatest threat to the"liberal" world order.
China doesn't get to rewrite the rules of the liberal world order or decide America can't be an Asian power anymore.
The liberal world order cannot survive on its own, because others lack either the interest or the means to sustain it.
Ultimately, these changes slowed the movement toward an increasingly open and liberal world order, which began to falter and soon reversed.
We categorically reject the allegations of those who accuse Russia andthe new centers of global influence of attempting to undermine the so-called'liberal world order.'.
We have created a liberal world order based on rules, which, despite many shortcomings, allowed to enter the most prosperous and peaceful era in human history.
We strongly disagree with those who blamed Russia andnew centers of global power for trying to undermine so-called liberal world order.
He is about to destroy what's left of the liberal world order because he thinks rules and institutions help America's rivals, China and Europe,” he said.
The United States, working closely with the United Kingdom and others,established the liberal world order in the wake of World War II.
With the waning of the liberal world order, a more normal historical era of geopolitical rivalry has commenced, and trade tensions are merely accompaniments to such rivalry.
During an interview this week, Secretary of State Mike Pompeosaid the president is trying to"reset" the liberal world order, not dismantle it.
If the liberal world order ever existed at all, there is no point discussing it now, Niall Ferguson, Senior Fellow at the Hoover Institution, Stanford University has said.
It does not matter who is right or wrong between Europeans and Americans,what is at stake is the liberal world order which is(was?) based on Euro-Atlantic solidarity.
For the rules-based, democratic, liberal world order can only survive if we stop pretending that we were not under pressure by those who believe that the interests of the powerful are much more important than the freedom of people and nations.
The latest G7 solidarity over Asian maritimesecurity underscored the member countries' commitment to the liberal world order transcending geographical distance.
The United States needed Western Europe in its camp and understood the value of technologically advanced, democratic allies with which it could share the burden of fighting communism anddefending what has come to be known as the liberal world order.
Some two and a half centuries later, the problem, to paraphrase Voltaire, is that the fading liberal world order is neither liberal nor worldwide nor orderly.
While divergent objectives guide such self-aggrandizing behavior, Beijing and Moscow make strange bedfellows under one common goal:to create a new geopolitical reality in opposition to the current liberal world order.
Trump and Brexit, secondly, with the growth of the rating of populist parties in Europe, finally,with a wave of anti-globalism challenging the liberal world order and based on populist slogans.
Right now, we are two or three bad elections away from the end of NATO,the end of the European Union and maybe the end of the liberal world order as we know it.
This new world order is challenging for liberal democratic countries.