Приклади вживання National accreditation bodies Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
National accreditation bodies shall not compete with other national accreditation bodies. .
Harmonised rules for cooperation between national accreditation bodies exist in the form of the EA cross frontier policy.
National accreditation bodies operates free from commercial motivations(Art. 8.1) and on a not-for- profit basis(Art. 4.7).
In such cases, appropriate cooperation and exchange of information between national accreditation bodies should be established.
Such national accreditation bodies should operate independently of commercial conformity assessment activities.
In such cases, appropriate cooperation and exchange of information between national accreditation bodies should be established.
Only the national accreditation bodies are allowed to perform accreditation of conformity assessment bodies. .
The multinational conformityassessment body must fully cooperate with the national accreditation bodies involved.
National accreditation bodies do not compete with conformity assessment bodies or among each other(Art. 6.1 and Art. 6.2).
It is therefore appropriate to provide that MemberStates ensure that, in the performance of their tasks, national accreditation bodies are deemed to exercise public authority, irrespective of their legal status.
National accreditation bodies shall monitor the conformity assessment bodies to which they have issued an accreditation certificate.
The team concluded that the operation of NAAU related to accreditation of CABs including accreditation of medical laboratories,complies with the established international requirements to the national accreditation bodies.
While national accreditation bodies do not have the objective of maximising or distributing profits, they may provide services in return for payment, or receive income.
The EA should, therefore, be the first body recognised under this Regulationand Member States should ensure that their national accreditation bodies seek and maintain membership of the EA for as long as it is so recognised.
National accreditation bodies shall have in place the necessary procedures to deal with complaints against the conformity assessment bodies they have accredited.
When accreditation is not used, the notifying authorities must perform periodical verifications to ensure the continuous competence of the notified body, in the same way as national accreditation bodies do.
With Regulation(EC) No 765/2008, only national accreditation bodies are allowed to provide accreditation of conformity assessment bodies. .
While national accreditation bodies do not have the objective of maximising or distributing profits, they may provide services in return for payment, or receive income.
Each national accreditation body shall inform the other national accreditation bodies of the conformity assessment activities in respect of which it operates accreditation and of any changes thereto.
Where the national accreditation bodies referred to in the first subparagraph do not perform accreditation in respect of the conformity assessment activities for which accreditation is sought;
Effective cooperation among national accreditation bodies is essential for the proper implementation of peer evaluation and with regard to cross-border accreditation. .
National accreditation bodies must therefore clearly demonstrate that the guiding principles of non-commerciality and sufficient resources for ensuring its competence in all activities are respected.
Peer evaluation shall ascertain whether the national accreditation bodies meet the requirements laid down in Article 8, taking into account the relevant harmonised standards referred to in Article 11.
National accreditation bodies shall establish and maintain appropriate structures to ensure the effective and balanced involvement of all interested parties within both their organisations and the body recognised under Article 14.
Member States shall monitor their national accreditation bodies at regular intervals in order to ensure that they fulfil the requirements laid down in Article 8 on a continuing basis.
Where the national accreditation bodies referred to in the first subparagraph have not successfully undergone peer evaluation under Article 10 in respect of the conformity assessment activities for which accreditation is sought.
Competition between national accreditation bodies could lead to the commercialisation of their activity, which would be incompatible with their role as the last level of control in the conformity assessment chain.
Competition between national accreditation bodies could lead to the commercialisation of their activity, which would be incompatible with their role as the last level of control in the conformity assessment chain.
National accreditation bodies may find themselves in competition on the markets of third countries, but that must have no effect on their activities inside the Community, or on the cooperation and peer evaluation activities organised by the body recognised under this Regulation.
National accreditation bodies may find themselves in competition on the markets of third countries, but that must have no effect on their activities inside the Community, or on the cooperation and peer evaluation activities organised by the body recognised under this Regulation.