Приклади вживання Pressing social need Англійська мовою та їх переклад на Українською
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Any interference must correspond to a“pressing social need”;
The reality of the pressing social need implied by the notion of.
Whether the interference corresponded to a"pressing social need" and.
The Court does not discern any pressing social need for requesting the disclosure of the confidential medical information concerning the applicants.
The necessity of the disclosure is identified as responding to a pressing social need, and.
Assess whether there is a"pressing social need" for the restriction.
In the opinion of the Court,their publication by the press did not correspond to a pressing social need.
Complained of corresponded to a‘pressing social need', whether it was.
(ii) The adjective'necessary', within the meaning of article 10.2,implies the existence of a'pressing social need'.
There was no convincingly established“pressing social need” for the liability of Internet service providers.
It is in the first place for thenational authorities to assess whether there is a“pressing social need” for the restriction.
Any such restriction must correspond to a“pressing social need” and must be“proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued” see, among others, the Wingrove v.
Admittedly, it is in the first place for thenational authorities to assess whether there is a“pressing social need” for the restriction.
There is a pressing social need for the restriction, which is implemented on the basis of a decision by a court or an independent administrative body that is subject to judicial review.
International human rights standards allow restrictions to the right tofreedom of assembly only in cases of'pressing social need'.
Fourthly, the applicant company insisted that there was no pressing social need for a strict liability standard for service providers.
The Government maintained that the“interference” complained of wasnecessary in a democratic society as it corresponded to a“pressing social need”.
There is a pressing social need for the restriction, which is implemented on the basis of a decision by a court or an independent administrative body that is subject to judicial review.
The expression“necessary in a democraticsociety” implies that the interference corresponds to a“pressing social need” and, in particular, that it is proportionate to the legitimate aim pursued.
Overall, there had not been a pressing social need to interfere with Stomakhin's rights by penalising him for some of his comments and the harshness of the penalty had violated his rights.
The examination criteria related to the existence of an interference, its legal foreseeability,whether it was necessary in a democratic society to meet a“pressing social need” and the specific circumstances of the case.
The Government had argued that theapplicants' conviction had also met a pressing social need as their article had been an abusive attack on Islam and had offended and insulted religious feelings.
(c) The“implied limitations” concept under Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 also means that the Court does notapply the traditional tests of“necessity” or“pressing social need” which are used in the context of Articles 8-11.
The Government submitted that the applicant's conviction had met a pressing social need in that the book in issue had contained an abusive attack on religion, in particular Islam, and had offended and insulted religious feelings.
As to the interference and whether it was necessary in a democratic society,the applicant took the view that it did not correspond to any pressing social need and that it was not proportionate to the aims pursued.
The Court concludes that theinterference complained of did not correspond to a pressing social need outweighing the public interest in the legitimate political discussion of the electoral campaign and the political figures involved in it.
While the right to freedom of expression is not absolute, an interference with this right is only permitted if it is prescribed by law, pursues one of the legitimate aims set out in Article 10, paragraph 2 of the Convention, is necessary in a democratic society-which implies that it corresponds to a pressing social need- and is proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued.
In these circumstances, the Court considers that the restrictions applied in the presentcase did not pursue a“pressing social need” and, accordingly, the reasons invoked by the authorities to refuse the registration of the Association were not relevant and sufficient.
The Court held that the criminal proceedings instituted against the applicant on charges of disseminating propaganda in favour of aterrorist organisation had not met a pressing social need, had not been proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued and had consequently not been necessary in a democratic society.
The Court therefore considered that the criminal proceedings instituted against the applicant on charges of disseminating propaganda in favour of aterrorist organisation had not met a pressing social need, had not been proportionate to the legitimate aims pursued and had consequently not been necessary in a democratic society.