Примери за използване на A conventional war на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
In other words, in a conventional war.
Russia definitely doesn't have the capability to go toe to toe with NATO in a conventional war.
This isn't a conventional war, Jim.
Could really harm the United States in a conventional war has.
As the conflict had intensified, a conventional war had escalated into one involving chemical and nuclear weapons.
Can the U.S. defeat Russia in a conventional war?
So we're talking about a conventional war of sorts; that war then eliciting the use of a nuclear weapon either by the Chinese or by the Iranians.
Distinguish between cold war and a conventional war.
As it cannot financially compete in a conventional war with NATO, it relies on first-strike nuclear options, especially at the battlefield level.
Now Russia does not have a chance against NATO in a conventional war.
It knows it cannot win a conventional war against the West.
Osama bin Laden understands that he cannot defeat the U.S. in a conventional war.
They expected a large-scale nuclear exchange, followed by a"conventional war" which itself would involve heavy use of tactical nuclear weapons.
They have the ability- andthe willingness- to bring a country to a standstill long before a conventional war takes place.
Unlike a conventional war, a civil war has no well defined front, nor belligerents clearly identifiable by the color of their uniform.
Putin is convinced that Washington andits NATO allies will not be able to conduct a conventional war against Russia or China.
Their fear is not only about a conventional war of tanks rolling across 627 miles(1,009 km) of border, but of smaller, ambiguous incidents similar to the tactics Moscow employed to wrest control of Ukraine's Crimea Peninsula last year.
White argues that without a cast iron guarantee from Washington, even the mere threat of a nuclear attack from China could“force us to capitulate in a conventional war.”.
However, after the Chinese communists reached the Northern border of Vietnam in 1949,the conflict became a conventional war between two armies equipped with modern weapons supplied by the two superpowers.
White argues that without a castiron guarantee from Washington, even the mere threat of a nuclear attack from China could“force us to capitulate in a conventional war.”.
However, after the Chinese communists reached the Northern border of Vietnam in 1949,the conflict became a conventional war between two armies equipped with modern weapons supplied by the United States and the Soviet Union.
We strongly believe that a conventional war in Europe runs a strong chance of turning nuclear very rapidly, and that any US/NATO nuclear strike on Russian forces or territory will automatically trigger a retaliato.
RAND analyst David Ochmanek famously said that with Blue representing the current US military potential andRed representing Russia-China in a conventional war,“Blue gets its ass handed to it”.
We strongly believe that a conventional war in Europe runs a strong chance of turning nuclear very rapidly, and that any US/NATO nuclear strike on Russian forces or territory will automatically trigger a retaliatory Russian nuclear strike on the continental US.
If we were absolutely certain that the nuclear dissuasion is one hundred per cent efficient in its role of protecting us against a nuclear assault,then its dissuasive value against a conventional war would have dropped to close to zero.”.
The idea that Israel might lose a conventional war seems ridiculous now, but the origins of the Israeli nuclear program lay in the fear that the Arab states would develop a decisive military advantage that they could use to inflict battlefield defeats.
Today, the enemy is more often than not a terrorist organisation or a‘rogue nation' and NATO forces are just as likely to be drafted in to a conflict zone to act as peace-makers on humanitarian missions as they are to be called upon to fight in a conventional war.
And in this type of exchange that's going to be nuclear… that's why I mentioned right at the very beginning… there will be a conventional war to begin with, then it will quickly go to nuclear with either Iran or the Chinese being provoked into first use, is because they won't be able to be in a position to defend themselves properly against what the West can deliver conventionally without going nuclear first.
Nevertheless, over the last three years, the mission has morphed into something more like a conventional ground war.
It seems unlikely that a conventional and structural war would be fought.