Примери за използване на Animal exploitation на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
But the animal exploitation on an industrial scale?
If we are not vegan,we are participating directly in animal exploitation.
Animal exploitation, because it exploits animals as property, is chattel slavery.
If you are not vegan you are participating directly in animal exploitation.”.
Similarly, if you believe that animal exploitation is wrong, the solution is not to support“happy” exploitation. .
Non-vegan diets thus cause more than 99.9% of the victims of animal exploitation.
To what extent can those who advocate the abolition of animal exploitation compare themselves to, and draw inspiration from, slavery abolitionists?
Anyone who lives a life that is not completely exempt from products of animal origin is responsible for animal exploitation.
Ethical vegans try to exclude all forms of animal exploitation from their lifestyle.
This is true in the case of unhealthy diets, of the habitual reliance on the“whole animal model” in science, andof the many other forms animal exploitation takes.
Taking this view, dietary choices that reduce animal exploitation are still valuable even if some animal exploitation would still occur.
Also, we work with Free Fur Alliance andits programme Fur Free Retailer to prevent animal exploitation.
Moreover, given that most people engage in animal exploitation, there is no principled way to distinguish exploiters for the purpose of justifying violence.
Veganism is a way of living that tries to minimize animal exploitation and cruelty.
The institution of animal exploitation(i.e. slavery) is a moral blind spot in our culture exactly as human slavery was a moral blind spot 160 years ago in America.
Abolitionists embrace the idea that there is veganism and there is animal exploitation: there is no third choice.
(2) that you regard as valid the logical arguments that our moral concern should not be limited to some nonhumans but should extend to all sentient beings and that we should abolish, andnot regulate, animal exploitation.
Veganism is defined as a way of living that attempts to exclude all forms of animal exploitation and cruelty, whether for food, clothing or any other purpose.
But that difficulty is no reason to continue to be involved with the things which areextremely easy to avoid, and which form the bulk of demand for animal exploitation.
Veganism is currently defined as a way of living that attempts to exclude all forms of animal exploitation and cruelty, be it from food, clothing, or any other purpose.
Sandra Mahlke argues that carnism is the"central crux of speciesism" because the eating of meat motivates ideological justification for other forms of animal exploitation.
Taking this view,dietary choices that reduce animal exploitation are still valuable even if some animal exploitation would still occur.
I conclude that our acceptance of the right of nonhumans not to be treated as property requires that we abolish institutionalized animal exploitation and stop producing domestic nonhumans for human use.
Fortunately, these times have passed a long time ago,and nowadays such animal exploitation is unthinkable, and whoever wants to see brown bears more closely, can find them free and undisturbed on the territory of National park Belitsa.
According to The Vegan Society,a vegan lifestyle is defined as“a way of living that attempts to exclude all forms of animal exploitation and cruelty, be it for food, clothing or any other purpose,”.
At this moment, animals and animal products are used in so many ways that it is near impossible to actually live in a way that avoids using any item, device orvehicle which has no connection with animal exploitation.
Both welfare campaigns and single-issue campaigns actually promote animal exploitation and result in partnerships between supposed animal advocates and institutionalized exploiters.
There is no exact definition of ethical veganism, butits followers deny any form of animal exploitation and refuse to wear wool or leather clothing or use animal-tested products.
They also reject single-issue campaigns,a particular sort of regulatory campaign that characterizes certain forms of animal exploitation as different from, and worse than, other forms of exploitation and which suggests, by implication, that other forms of exploitation are acceptable.
Abolitionists maintain that our recognition of this one basic right means that we must abolish, and not merely regulate,institutionalized animal exploitation, and that abolitionists should not support welfare reform campaigns or single-issue campaigns.