Примери за използване на Animals is unnecessary на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Testing on animals is unnecessary and expensive.
The CDC stated“up to half of antibiotic use in humans and much of the antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.”.
In view of the above, the CVMP considers use in puppies less than 9 weeks of age or dogs less than 2.5 kg is unlikelyto give rise to a safety concern, therefore a restriction on use in such animals is unnecessary.
As the CDC put it,"much of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.".
The Committee considered on basis of a target animal safety study that the use of the concerned product in puppies less than 9 weeks of age or dogs less than 2.5 kg is unlikelyto give rise to a safety concern and therefore a restriction on use in such animals is unnecessary.
The CDC concurred:"[M]uch of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.".
The CDC, in its recent report, stated bluntly,"Much of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.".
As the report states,“much of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.".
The CDC concludes,“Much of the antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.”.
The new federal report confirms that“much of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.”.
The Center for Disease Control& Prevention says,“much of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.”.
According to the New York Times,“The report said that“much of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.”.
In its 2013 drug resistance report, the CDC held that“much of antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.”.
According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention,“Much of the antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate, and makes everyone less safe.”.
And the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has said that“Much of the antibiotic use in animals is unnecessary and inappropriate and makes everyone less safe.”.
Unfortunately, many antibiotics prescribed to people and to animals are unnecessary.
What we are doing to animals is totally unnecessary.
Jan 2019∫ So long as the slaughter of animals is really unnecessary for human food, so long does it remain a moral crime, an ancient shame upon whole nations, against which prophets and saints, seers and teachers have inveighed and warned….
It comes from the belief that hurting people, animals or the environment is unnecessary to achieve an outcome and refers to a general philosophy of abstention from violence based on moral, religious or spiritual principles.”.
Most of us already believe that animals should not be harmed unnecessarily yet eating animal products harms and kills animals and is unnecessary for human health.
In the commentary to BG 2.27 it reads that wars and unnecessary killing of people and animals is not justified and in the next sentence it reads that violence and war are indispensable in keeping order and lawfulness in human society.
For this reason, we do not call vegetarians"plant-eaters" or"non-meat-eaters" because we understand that vegetarianism,though its principles are manifested in the act of abstaining from the consumption of flesh, is actually a philosophy in which the subjugation of other animals is considered unnecessary and unjust.
It has been said that Ayurvedic teachings can be directly obtained via meditation or divine revelation, as guessing or animal testing was unnecessary.
My final point is that animals should not be subjected to unnecessary suffering.
We believe that holding animals in cages is cruel, unnecessary and has no place in Europe.
We know you guys believe in the cause… That fur is the unnecessary killing of animals For nothing more than human vanity.
Member States shall ensure that any such transport is permitted only where no unnecessary suffering or ill treatment is caused to the animals concerned.
Animal testing of cosmetics is cruel and unnecessary.
During collection and transport, animals must be handled carefully without causing unnecessary distress.
The Body Shop passionately believes that no animal should be harmed in the name of cosmetics and that animal testing on products and ingredients is outdated, cruel and unnecessary.