Примери за използване на Assessment of adverse на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on data from three studies in adults(n=1,479) and three paediatric studies(n=169).
In the asthma clinical development program a total of 7,034 patients were included in an integrated assessment of adverse reactions.
Assessment of adverse reactions for REYATAZ is based on safety data from clinical studies and postmarketing experience.
It improves patient safety and public health through better prevention, detection and assessment of adverse reactions to medicines.
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on pooled data from five Phase 3 clinical studies(both controlled and uncontrolled).
The relevance of the study designs, for the assessment of adverse effects and of the endocrine mode of action;
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on two Phase 3 studies(study 312-0116 and study 312-0119) and six Phase 1 and 2 studies.
Assessment of adverse reactions for tenofovir disoproxil is based on safety data from clinical studies and post-marketing experience.
Assessment of adverse reactions for regadenoson is based on safety data from clinical studies and postmarketing experience.
The assessment of adverse reactions is based on safety data from across all Phase 2 and 3 studies with Biktarvy and from post-marketing experience.
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on experience from post-marketing surveillance and from three pivotal clinical studies in patients with chronic hepatitis B.
Assessment of adverse reactions from clinical study data is based on experience in three studies in adults(n= 1,479) and three paediatric studies(n= 169).
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on safety data from across all Phase 2 and 3 studies in which 2,396 patients received Genvoya and from post-marketing experience.
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on experience in four Phase 3 clinical studies involving CF patients with chronic P. aeruginosa infection and post-marketing spontaneous reporting.
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on safety data from across all Phase 2 and 3 studies in which 3,112 HIV-1 infected patients received medicinal products containing emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide and from post-marketing experience.
Assessment of adverse reactions is mainly based on two studies, NV-02B-007(GLOBE) and NV-02B015, in which 1,699 patients with chronic hepatitis B received double-blind treatment with telbivudine 600 mg/day(n= 847) or lamivudine(n= 852) for 104 weeks.
The assessment of adverse reactions was based on the exposure of 23 patients from 4 clinical trials, aged 5 months to 25 years, who received vestronidase alfa at doses up to 4 mg/kg once every two weeks for up to 132 weeks.
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on four clinical studies in which 1,720 patients with chronic hepatitis B infection received double-blind treatment with entecavir 0.5 mg/ day(n= 679), entecavir 1 mg/ day(n= 183), or lamivudine(n= 858) for up to 107 weeks.
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on one randomised study(study GS-US-174-0115) in 106 adolescent patients(12 to< 18 years of age) with chronic hepatitis B receiving treatment with tenofovir disoproxil 245 mg(n= 52) or placebo(n= 54) for 72 weeks.
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on experience from postmarketing surveillance and four clinical studies in which 1,720 patients with chronic hepatitis B infection and compensated liver disease received double-blind treatment with entecavir(n= 862) or lamivudine(n= 858) for up to 107 weeks(see section 5.1).
The assessment of adverse reactions is based on the exposure of 176 patients with MPS IVA, ages 5 to 57 years old to 2 mg/kg elosulfase alfa once a week(n=58), 2 mg/kg elosulfase alfa once every other week(n=59), or placebo(n=59) in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled study.
Assessment of adverse reactions from clinical study data is based on two Phase 3 and one Phase 2A short- term(24-hour) placebo-controlled clinical trials enrolling 524 adult patients with agitation associated with schizophrenia(including 27 patients with schizoaffective disorder) or bipolar disorder, treated with ADASUVE 4.5 mg(265 patients) or ADASUVE 9.1 mg(259 patients).
Assessment of adverse reactions related to emtricitabine is based on experience in three paediatric studies(n= 169) where treatment-naïve(n= 123) and treatment-experienced(n= 46) paediatric HIV infected patients aged 4 months to 18 years were treated with emtricitabine in combination with other antiretroviral agents.
Assessment of adverse reactions related to emtricitabine is based on experience in three paediatric studies(n= 169) where treatment-naïve(n= 123) and treatment-experienced(n= 46) paediatric HIV infected patients aged 4 months to 18 years were treated with emtricitabine in combination with other antiretroviral agents.
Assessment of adverse reactions was based on exposure in 114 UCD patients(65 adults and 49 children between the ages of 2 months and 17 years) with deficiencies in CPS, OTC, ASS, ASL, ARG, or HHH across 4 short term and 3 long term clinical studies, in which 90 patients completed 12 months duration(median exposure= 51 weeks).
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on pooled safety data from 2 controlled Phase 3 studies in which 866 HBV infected patients received tenofovir alafenamide 25 mg once daily in a double-blind fashion through Week 96(median duration of blinded study drug exposure of 104 weeks) and from post-marketing experience.
Assessment of adverse reactions from clinical study data is based on experience in two double-blind comparative controlled studies in which 641 patients with chronic hepatitis B and compensated liver disease received treatment with tenofovir disoproxil 245 mg(as fumarate) daily(n= 426) or adefovir dipivoxil 10 mg daily(n= 215) for 48 weeks.
Assessment of adverse reactions is based on data from a controlled clinical study(GS-US-183-0145) in which 712 HIV-1 infected, antiretroviral treatment-experienced adults received elvitegravir(n= 354) or raltegravir(n= 358) each administered with a background regimen consisting of a fully active ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor and other antiretroviral agents.
Assessment of adverse reactions from clinical study data is based on two Phase 3 and one Phase 2A short- term(24-hour) placebo-controlled clinical trials enrolling 524 adult patients with agitation associated with schizophrenia(including 27 patients with schizoaffective disorder) or bipolar disorder, treated with ADASUVE 4.5 mg(265 patients) or ADASUVE 9.1 mg(259 patients).
Assessment of adverse reactions for the fixed combination Atripla is based on experience from:• a 48-week clinical study of Atripla(see Table 2)• a clinical study in which efavirenz, emtricitabine and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate were co- administered(see Table 3)• clinical study and post-marketing experience with the individual components of Atripla(see Table 4).