Примери за използване на Auclast на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
The AUClast geometric mean ratio was 0.99 and 90% confidence intervals were 80.18%-122.80%.
In the patients with indications of higher absorption, dose-normalised(per gram of NexoBrid) AUClast ranged from 4500-9820 ngh/ml per gram of NexoBrid.
Feeding significantly increased torasemide AUClast by 36% on average and slightly delayed Tmax but no significant impact on Cmax was detected.
AUClast was 35% lower in mild hepatic impairment, 14% higher in moderate hepatic impairment and 23% lower in severe hepatic impairment.
The primary analysis was conducted on AUClast and Cmax, using the log-transformed ratios and 90% Confidence Intervals(CIs).
Given the main analysis results, the probability for bioinequivalency was evaluated by the Applicant andit resulted to be less than 1% for Cmax and 0.02% for AUClast.
Cmax and AUClast for LEQ803(a prominent metabolite of ribociclib accounting for less than 10% of parent exposure) decreased by 96% and 98%, respectively.
There is complete oralmost complete lack of absorption of the drug(AUClast is less than 10% of the mean values of the corresponding formulation)- If T-max is> 12 h.
The mean Cmax and AUClast following a single 10 mg dose of tenofovir alafenamide administered in E/C/F/TAF were 0.21± 0.10 μg/mL and 0.25± 0.08 μg•h/mL, respectively.
Administration of ibrutinib in fasted condition resulted in approximately 60% of exposure(AUClast) as compared to either 30 minutes before, 30 minutes after(fed condition) or 2 hours after a high fat breakfast.
After a single 0.25 mg dose of digoxin, a P-gp substrate, concomitant administration of 127 mg twice daily doses of eliglustat resulted in a 1.7- and1.5-fold increase in digoxin Cmax and AUClast, respectively.
The AUC from time zero to 48 hours after administration(AUClast) was 43,400± 46,100 ngh/ml(mean± SD) for the group of 15 patients, with a range of 4560-167,000 ngh/ml.
Relative to fasting conditions, the administration of tenofovir alafenamide with a moderate fat meal(~600 kcal, 27% fat) and a high fat meal(~800 kcal, 50% fat)resulted in an increase in AUClast by 48% and 63%, respectively.
The confidential interval of the indices AUClast and Cmax between Dialgin and Novalgin satisfied the international established intervals for bioequivalence of both products.
The median time to maximum concentration(Tmax) was 3.0 days(range: 2.0 to 4.0 days) andthe mean area under the concentration time curve to the last measurable concentration(AUClast) was 111 mcg*day/ml(SD= 64.4 mcg*day/ml).
These results for Cmax and AUClast indicate that systemic absorption may depend both on the applied NexoBrid dose(proportional to the covered wound area) and other, patient-specific factors.
In patients with primary hypercholesterolaemia or mixed dyslipidaemia on high dose statin,the systemic exposure of evolocumab was slightly lower than in subjects on low-to-moderate dose statin(the ratio of AUClast 0.74[90% CI 0.29; 1.9]).
A moderate mean increase in total systemic exposure(AUClast) of up to 1.4-fold was seen in subjects with mild and moderate renal impairment and up to 2.2-fold in subjects with severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease.
In the first study the M14 metabolite, a peptide fragment and the most abundant circulating metabolite, increased 2- and 3-fold in patients with moderate and severe renal impairment, respectively, and7-fold in patients requiring dialysis(based on AUClast).
A moderate mean increase in total system exposure(AUClast) to glycopyrronium of up to 1.4-fold was seen in subjects with mild and moderate renal impairment and up to 2.2-fold in subjects with severe renal impairment and end-stage renal disease.
Pharmacokinetic parameters of paclitaxel at 175 mg/ m2 given over 3 hours in 13 patients with breast cancer were as follows: maximum concentration(Cmax) was 3,890 ng/ ml,area under the plasma concentration vs. time curve(AUClast) was 14,090 ng·h/ ml and clearance(CL) was 13.3 l/ h/ m2.
Geometric mean ratios for Cmax and AUClast were 11% and 25% higher respectively for subjects with mild hepatic impairment, and 32% and 46% higher respectively for subjects with moderate hepatic impairment compared to subjects with normal hepatic function.
Following an intravenous bolus or subcutaneous injection of a 1.3 mg/m2 dose to patients with multiple myeloma(n=14 in the intravenous group, n=17 in the subcutaneous group),the total systemic exposure after repeat dose administration(AUClast) was equivalent for subcutaneous and intravenous administrations.
A mean increase in total systemic exposure(AUClast) of up to 1.4 fold was seen in adult subjects with mild and moderate renal impairment(GFR≥30mL/min/1.73m2) and up to 2.2 fold in subjects with severe renal impairment or end stage renal disease(estimated GFR< 30 mL/min/1.73m2).
The effect of impaired liver function varied substantially between individuals, but on average a 2.7-, 8.2-, and9.8-fold increase in ibrutinib exposure(AUClast) was observed in subjects with mild(n=6, Child-Pugh class A), moderate(n=10, Child-Pugh class B) and severe(n=8, Child-Pugh class C) hepatic impairment, respectively.
Baseline hepatic function status had no marked effect on the total systemic exposure(AUClast) of carfilzomib following single or repeat-dose administration(geometric mean ratio in AUClast at the 27 mg/m2 dose in cycle 1, day 16 for mild and moderate impairment versus normal hepatic function were 144.4% and 126.1%, respectively; and at the 56 mg/m2 dose in cycle 2, day 1 were 144.7% and 121.1%).