Примери за използване на Defamation laws на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Defamation laws are often used to pressure journalists.
The main exception involves the country's strict defamation laws.
Defamation laws appear only to protect the rich and powerful.
Steps should be taken,in those States which still have criminal defamation laws in place, to progressively implement this Principle.
Defamation laws are meant to safeguard reputations.
There is always the potential for abuse of criminal defamation laws, even in countries where in general they are applied in a moderate fashion.
Defamation laws are usually used to seek to protect the reputation of individuals.
This forms part of a list of seven demands put to the government on Monday which also call for reforms to freedom of information and defamation laws.
Defamation laws are generally accepted in order to protect the reputation of individuals.
Regrets also the lack of progress in addressing abuse of defamation laws in order to intimidate journalists and others investigating corruption;
Similar measures limiting the enjoyment of the freedom of expression and information or the basic functions of free and independent media,as for instance the very existence of criminal defamation laws, have the same potential to corrupt the democratic debate.
All criminal defamation laws should be abolished and, where necessary, replaced with civil defamation laws.
Criminal defamation is not a justifiable restriction on freedom of expression; all criminal defamation laws should be abolished and replaced, where necessary, with appropriate civil defamation laws.
All criminal defamation laws are abolished and replaced, where necessary, with appropriate civil defamation laws;
Although the press in Australia can report largely free of political interference,strict defamation laws, court gag orders, and state security statutes affect what can be said in print and broadcast.
(a) All criminal defamation laws should be abolished and replaced, where necessary, with appropriate civil defamation laws.
The Parliamentary Assembly, referring to its Resolution…(2007) entitled“Towards decriminalisation of defamation”,calls on the Committee of Ministers to urge all member states to review their defamation laws and, where necessary, make amendments in order to bring them into line with the case law of the European Court of Human Rights, with a view to removing all risk of abuse or unjustified prosecutions;
Whereas defamation laws, such as the criminalisation of acts deemed to be‘defamation', are in place in several countries, including EU Member States, possibly undermining freedom of speech and the media and dissuading whistleblowers and journalists from denouncing corrupt activity;
The rankings were based on factors including restrictions on privately owned or independent media;criminal defamation laws; restrictions on the dissemination of false news; blocking of websites; surveillance of journalists by authorities; license requirements for media; and targeted hacking or trolling.
The use of criminal defamation laws, carrying penalties of imprisonment, against human rights defenders reporting on alleged human violations, constitutes a violation of Thailand's obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR), to which it is a state party.
The report stresses the need to protect whistle-blowers and encryption-related rights,calls for the chilling effects of defamation laws to be recognised, warns against the arbitrary imposition of states of emergency and insists on the desirability of investing in digital literacy to empower citizens and online users.
Whereas the disproportionate use of criminal defamation laws, which carry penalties of imprisonment, against human rights defenders who report on alleged human violations, limits freedom of expression in violation of Thailand's obligations under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights(ICCPR), to which it is a state party;
The report stresses the need to protect whistle-blowers and encryption-related rights,calls for the chilling effects of defamation laws to be recognised, warns against the arbitrary imposition of states of emergency and insists on the desirability of investing in digital literacy to empower citizens and online users.
In many countries, criminal defamation laws are abused by the powerful to limit criticism and to stifle public debate.
They recommend that all criminal defamation laws be abolished and replaced, where necessary, with appropriate civil defamation laws.
The illegitimacy of the use of criminal defamation laws to maintain public order, or to protect other public interests, has already been noted.
In many countries, however, defamation laws are often abused of and have become a significant obstacle to the free flow of information and ideas.
Calls on the Commission to address andcounter the possible negative impact of defamation laws in third countries and reiterates its call on all Member States to consider decriminalising defamation and merely using civil lawsuits as means of protecting one's reputation;
(b) As a practical matter,in recognition of the fact that in many States criminal defamation laws are the primary means of addressing unwarranted attacks on reputation, immediate steps should be taken to ensure that any criminal defamation laws still in force conform fully to the following conditions.
The central purpose of defamation law is the protection of reputation.