Примери за използване на Difference was not statistically significant на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Medicine
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
This difference was not statistically significant.
However, researchers found that the difference was not statistically significant.
This difference was not statistically significant.
Parkinsonism did improve slightly more in the IM group, but the difference was not statistically significant.
This difference was not statistically significant.
The microbiological response was better in the levofloxacin group; the difference was not statistically significant.
The difference was not statistically significant(p=0.326).
Sixty-three percent of Q4- and81% of Q2treated patients met the composite endpoint at Month 24; the difference was not statistically significant based on the 95% CI(-0.357, 0.058).
However, the difference was not statistically significant(18).
The proportion of black patients achieving an SRI-S2K response was higher in patients receiving Benlysta but the difference was not statistically significant compared with placebo.
I quote,“the difference was not statistically significant.”.
A trend was observed in both trials in the improvement of MBS from baseline to week 4 in favour of ospemifene compared to placebo, although the difference was not statistically significant.
The difference was not statistically significant, the researchers noted.
Oteracil AUC0-12 in the Asian group was approximately half that of the Caucasian group, however, this difference was not statistically significant due to its large individual variability.
This difference was not statistically significant, the researchers said.
Although breast cancer-specific mortality was higher in women with persistent VMS, the difference was not statistically significant, which meant that persistent VMS did not influence breast cancer survival rates.
The difference was not statistically significant, meaning it could have occurred by chance.
Haematochezia was reported as an adverse experience in 0.6%(39/ 6,130) of vaccine recipients and 0.6%(34/ 5,560)of placebo recipients within 42 days of any dose(the difference was not statistically significant).
The difference was not statistically significant, meaning that the results could have Sote due to chance.
After 4 weeks of treatment Brimica Genuair implied improvement versus placebo in change from baseline in morning pre-dose(trough) FRC,the primary endpoint, but the difference was not statistically significant(-0.125 L; 95% CI=(-0.259, 0.010); p=0.069*).
This difference was not statistically significant which means it could have been due to random chance.
The effect was more pronounced in the younger age group(60 to 69 years) where the efficacy of ZOSTAVAX on HZ pain BOI was 66% compared to 55% in patients≥70 years of age; however, this difference was not statistically significant(p=0.266).
The difference was not statistically significant and no consistent cause was apparent, however a contribution of dexrazoxane to the difference cannot be ruled out.
In female patients, the adjusted mean change in FEV1 was 27ml for Bronchitol and 44ml for the control arm,suggesting potentially inferior benefit on lung function with Bronchitol compared to the control, although the difference was not statistically significant(p=0.480).
The difference was not statistically significant, however more than half of the patients in the anastrozole alone arm crossed over to a trastuzumab containing regimen after progression of disease.
The rates(events per patient-year of exposure) of confirmed hypoglycaemia(ISPAD 2009 definition: 46.23 vs 49.55) and nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia(5.77 vs 5.40) were comparable with Ryzodeg vs insulin detemir whereas the rate of severe hypoglycaemia(0.26 vs 0.07)was higher in the Ryzodeg arm although the difference was not statistically significant.
But the study only lasted a few months, and the difference wasn't statistically significant.
The differences were not statistically significant.
But the difference wasn't statistically significant, meaning it may be due to chance.
The difference wasn't statistically significant, meaning it could have been due to chance.