Примери за използване на Different courts на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Also Streaming will be available from 6 different courts!
Four different courts of appeal have reviewed and rejected each and every one of his arguments.
The opponents fought in many different courts until December 13.
The extent to which the Turkish judiciary is dependent on politics is also demonstrated by a dispute between different courts.
For the competence of the different courts, see Chapter 12 of the Laws of Malta.
Хората също превеждат
The accused party has been constituted in this particular capacity on account of several offences committed in the areas of different courts; 2.
Xu had worked at different courts for 25 years in three provinces, Hainan, Yunnan, and Jiangsu.
The attached document contains technical information about the videoconferencing equipment installed in the different courts.
In Romania, similar cases handled by different Courts can have completely different outcomes.
However, in some circumstances the allocation rules may be used to assign different types of case to different courts within the same district.
Torts and crimes are tried in different courts and although both accused parties are known as defendants the charges of a tort are laid by a plaintiff while crimes are brought to court by the federal government.
If the accused committed crimes coming under the jurisdiction of different courts, then the general court shall be competent to hear the case.
If that court cannot be identified, the competent court is the court of the place where the injunction is to be implemented or, in the absence of that basis orif the injunction is to be implemented within the jurisdiction of different courts, Warsaw District Court‘sąd rejonowy dla m.
(2) Where the person has been sentenced with several sentences by different courts, that court which has imposed the heaviest punishment shall be competent, and where the punishments are equally heavy- the court which has issued the last sentence.
One such procedural rule is a lis pendens rule,which will come into play if the same matrimonial property regime case is brought before different courts in different Member States.
If there are two ormore respondents located in the jurisdiction of different courts, the person filing the action is allowed to freely choose between these courts, unless rules for exclusive jurisdiction favoring one of the courts are found in the Administrative Court Proceedings Act.
(1) Where an aggregate punishment shall be determined for several crimes,for which there are effective verdicts passed by different Courts, competent shall be the Court, which has passed the last verdict.
The Fundamental Act on the Organisation of the Courts(legge fondamentale sull'ordinamento giudiziario), Act No 12 of 30 January 1941, Article 65, lists among the Court's major functions thatof ensuring‘the correct application of the law and its uniform interpretation, the unity of law throughout the country, and observance of the limits between the jurisdiction of the different courts'.
(3) Where the place of commitment of the crime cannot be determined, or the indictment is for several criminal offences,committed in the region of different Courts, the case shall be under the jurisdiction of the Court, in the region of which the pre-trial procedure has been finalized.
Numerous courts exist, among which the work is distributed according to criteria determining jurisdiction- subject matter, amount, person, function orregion- since the unity of the judicial power does not preclude the existence of different courts with different areas of jurisdiction.
The requirement that a divergence must arise in the context of the same situation of law andfact makes it necessary to ascertain whether the decisions that might be given by two different courts have the potential to be inconsistent and contradictory, even if it is not necessary to establish that they will have radically irreconcilable legal consequences.
Numerous courts exist, among which the work is distributed according to criteria determining jurisdiction- subject matter, amount, person, function orregion- since the unity of the judicial power does not preclude the existence of different courts with different areas of jurisdiction.
That is confirmed by Article 33(4), which provides that disputes between air carriers and passengers are“governed by the law of the court seised of the case”, which, accordingly,includes the law relating to the allocation of jurisdiction between the different courts of a particular State on the basis of the amount in dispute'.
Whether the case is subject to the jurisdiction of a different court in the hierarchy.
Is there a right to appeal again to a higher/different court?
Three sorts of lawbreaking exist,each of which is heard by a different court.
The applicant is entitled to bring the case before a different court in certain cases.
From a different court.
Different court panels have assumed that any removal of an archaeological find outside the archaeological structures results in damage to the site and loss of historical evidence.
Through an appeal the case is heard again by a different court, this may lead to a new decision.