Примери за използване на Factually inaccurate на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
I can restrain myself when I hear something factually inaccurate.
That's factually inaccurate.
You can tell us if you think the personal information,we are processing about you, is factually inaccurate.
This is factually inaccurate.
This shall also apply to damage caused by the issuing Member State,where the latter entered factually inaccurate data or stored data unlawfully.
Contains factually inaccurate information, libelous information, or information which damages a business reputation.
This comparison is factually inaccurate.
The spread of factually inaccurate opinions such as these is a daily occurrence within Turkey's heavily corrupted information ecosystem.
Any site that misleads the reader by use of factually inaccurate material or unverifiable research.
The second draft law would give authorities the power to block websites if they fail to comply with requests to remove information that the state deems to be factually inaccurate.
If you believe something is factually inaccurate, please use the associated talk-page and let us know.
This shall also apply to damage caused by the issuing Member State,where the latter entered factually inaccurate data or stored data unlawfully.
China said the report is factually inaccurate and unprofessional, and instead accused the U.S. of carrying out cyber attacks against China.
This shall also apply to damage caused by the Member State which issued the alert,where the latter entered factually inaccurate data or stored data unlawfully.
In the event that data recorded in the ECRIS-TCN system are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the convicting Member State shall correct or delete the data in accordance with Article 9.
This shall also apply to injury caused by the contracting party which issued the alert,where the latter entered factually inaccurate data or stored data unlawfully.
For the purposes laid down in Article 1(1),iIf it emerges that data recorded in the Central System are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the Member State which transmitted them shall correct Ö rectify Õ or erase the data in accordance with Article 27 28(3).
The Commission noted that the statement that it did not use any data provided by the cooperating exporting producers when establishing the undistorted normal value is factually inaccurate.
If a Member State or the Central Unit has evidence to suggest that data recorded in the central database are factually inaccurate, it shall advise the Member State of origin as soon as possible.
In the event that data recorded in the EES are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the Member State responsible or, where applicable, the Member State to which the request has been made shall correct or delete the data in accordance with Article 32.
For the purposes laid down in Article 1(1),if it emerges that data recorded in the Central System are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the Member State which transmitted them shall correct or erase the data in accordance with Article 27(3).
In the event that data recorded in the EES are factually inaccurate, incomplete or have been recorded unlawfully, the Member State responsible or, where applicable, the Member State to which the request has been made shall rectify, complete or erase the personal data or restrict the processing of personal data in accordance with Article 32.
Where, following an examination, it is found that the data stored in the multiple-identity detector(MID)are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the Member State responsible or, where applicable, the Member State to which the request has been made shall correct or delete these data.
Where in response to a request,it is found that the data stored in VIS are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the Member State responsible shall rectify or erase those data in VIS without delay and at the latest within 30 days of receipt of the request in line with Article 12(3) and(4) of Regulation(EU) 2016/679.
If the ETIAS Central Unit has evidence to suggest that data stored in the ETIAS Central System are factually inaccurate or that data were processed in the ETIAS Central System in contravention of this Regulation, it shall contact the ETIAS National Unit of the Member State responsible within 14 days.
Where in response to a request, it is found that the data stored in the ETIAS Central System are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the ETIAS Central Unit or the ETIAS National Unit of the Member State responsible shall rectify or erase those data in the ETIAS Central System without delay.
Where following an examination it is found that the data stored in the ETIAS Central System are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, the ETIAS Central Unit or the ETIAS National Unit of the responsible Member State for the application shall correct or delete these data in the ETIAS Central System.
If the convicting Member State does not agree that data recorded in the ECRIS-TCN system are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, that Member State shall adopt an administrative decision explaining in writing to the person concerned without delay why it is not prepared to correct or delete data relating to him or her.
If the Member State to which the request has been made does not agree that data recorded in the ECRIS-TCN system are factually inaccurate or have been recorded unlawfully, that Member State shall adopt an administrative decision explaining in writing to the person concerned without delay why it is not prepared to correct or delete data relating to him.