Примери за използване на Form of commodities на Английски и техните преводи на Български
{-}
-
Colloquial
-
Official
-
Medicine
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Ecclesiastic
-
Computer
Capital in the form of commodities has to perform the function of commodities. .
From where, then, arises the enigmatical character of the product of labour,so soon as it assumes the form of commodities?
In the form of commodities, capital has to perform the functions of commodities. .
So where does the mysterious character of the product of labour arise from as soon as it assumes the form of commodities.
Hence the commodity-capital here appears in the form of commodities which the laborer buys with his wages, that is to say, means of subsistence.
If in the first place Italy had enough capital to replace the English capital exported to Italy in the form of commodities;
They manifest themselves therefore as commodities, or have the form of commodities, only in so far as they have two forms, a physical or natural form, and a value-form.
Objects that in themselves are no commodities, such as conscience, honour and the like, are capable of being offered for sale by their holders, and of thus acquiring,through their price, the form of commodities.
Had we[…] inquired under what circumstances all, oreven the majority of products take the form of commodities, we should have found that this can only happen with production of a very specific kind, capitalist production.
The capitalist throws less value in the form of money into the circulation than hedraws out of it, because he throws into it more value in the form of commodities than he had withdrawn from it.
Had we gone further to inquire under what circumstances all oreven a majority of products take the form of commodities, we should have found that this can only happen with a specific kind of production, which is capitalist production.1.
On the other hand if the wage-labourers, the mass of direct producers, are to perform the act L- M- C, they must constantly be faced with the necessary means of subsistence in purchasable form, i.e., in the form of commodities.
Had we gone further, and inquired under what circumstances all, oreven the majority of products take the form of commodities, we should have found that his can only happen with production of a very specific kind, capitalist production.
The purely atomic behaviour of men in their social production process and the objective shape taken by their own production relations, independently of their control and their conscious individual actions,appear in this: that their products take the form of commodities.
Had we gone further, and enquired under what circumstances all, oreven the majority of products take the form of commodities we should have found that this can only happen with production of a specific kind, capitalist production.”.
In form III, on the other hand, capital-value does not begin the process as an advance, butas an expanded value, as the aggregate wealth existing in the form of commodities, of which the advanced value is but a part.
As the dominant subject of this process, in which it alternately assumes andloses the form of money and the form of commodities, but preserves and expands itself through all these changes, value requires above all an independent form by means of which its identity with itself may be asserted.
One part of his capital is in the form of money and is transformed into commodities, while the capital of the capitalist producer of coal exists in the form of commodities and is therefore transformed into money;
As the dominant subject[übergreifendes Subjekt] of this process, which it alternately assumes andloses the form of money and form of commodities, but preserves and expands itself through these changes, value requires above all an independent form by means of which its identity with itself may be asserted.
Since we have assumed that commodities are bought and sold at their values,these transformations constitute merely a conversion of the same value from one form into another, from the form of commodities into that of money or vice versa, a change of composition in substance.
Had we gone further, and inquired under what circ*mstances all oreven the majority of products take the form of commodities, we should have found that this can only happen with production of a very specific kind, capitalist production.
There can be no direct or indirect balancing of accounts in this case such as we find in the purchase of means of production and in the sale of produced commodities(so thatthe greater part of the money-capital actually figures only in the form of commodities, money only in the form of money of account and finally in cash only in the balancing of accounts).
As the dominant subject of this process, in which it alternately assumes andloses the form of money and the form of commodities, but preserves and expands itself through all these changes, value requires above all an independent form by means of which its identity with itself may be asserted.
If the entire commodity-product can be separated into independent homogeneous partial products, as in the case of our 10,000 lbs. of yarn, and if therefore the act C'- M' can be represented by a number of successive sales,then the capital-value in the form of commodities can function as C, can be separated from C', before the surplus-value, hence before C' in its entirety, has been realised.
Had we gone further, and inquired under what circumstances all, oreven the majority of products take the form of commodities, we should have found that this only happens on the basis of one particular mode of production, the capitalist one.“.
If the entire commodity-product is separable into independent homogeneous parts, as is the case in our 10,000 lbs. of yarn, so that the act C'- M' is performed by means of a number of successive sales,then capital-value in the form of commodities can perform the functions of C and can be separated from C', before the surplus-value, or the entire value of C', has been realized.
If we would have pursued our investigation and asked:'Under what conditions do all oreven the majority of products take the form of commodities'!', we would have discovered that this happens only on the basis of a very specific mode of production, the capitalist one” Volume I, chapter IV.
Or in other words, one part can perform the functions of productive capital only on condition that another part is withdrawn from production in the form of commodity or money-capital.
Or in other words, one part can perform the function of productive capital only on condition that another part is withdrawn from production proper in the form of commodity- or money-capital.